Originally posted by Slap Shot
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The States: Where We Wish Texas Would Secede Already
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by St. Clown View PostJoyce Alene, a US attorney for Obama, thinks that it’s a lead-up to overturn Obergefell.
https://***********/joycewhitevance/...27WTEiS8o60kMQ
There's plenty of horse hockey legislation that has or will pass to focus on. Don't waste time on the stuff that's meant to grab headlines to distract from that.
Leave a comment:
-
Mark Cuban? Good God no. That is almost a bad as people who want Oprah or The Rock. Putting politically incompetent people in the highest office is lazy and stupid.
Mark Cuban may have better politics but he is no more qualified to be President than Trump was and he is just as irrationally hotheaded.
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Slap Shot View Post
Specifically why?
We don't need Bushes or Kennedys or Romneys or Forbes. We need humans.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MissThundercat View PostRepublicans in Iowa want to ban same sex marriage. And the language in the bill is especially transphobic.
https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-...iage-rcna72759
https://***********/joycewhitevance/...27WTEiS8o60kMQ
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Kepler View Post
No, please. No. Just no.
Leave a comment:
-
There are plenty of people there, the Dems just have a way of self-eliminating before things even get going. I'm not saying every person who is interested in the nomination is a great or even good choice, mind you, but we have a way of checking people off before we even get the debate going because they are not the love-child of JFK and Obama. The GOP at least lets people build up some momentum during their process, so that their names get out there and they get the ball rolling for other positions even if they don't win the POTUS nomination, whereas we write people off before the process even starts, and then wonder why our bench is weak. We write off candidates from large consistently-blue states because we don't want to be pushing coastal liberalism on people, but you don't see the GOP writing off candidates from Texas; if anything that gets them mega-hard and they push them even more strongly. I'm not saying we become total *******s like that, but we need to push the brand a little more rather than let the potential criticisms hamstring us into doing nothing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dxmnkd316 View Post
So who gets you excited? I'll admit, this is a pretty bad farm system we have right now. Single A fully stocked, AAA... yikes.
And all the Clintonistas are dead. Addition by subtraction.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by FadeToBlack&Gold View PostNewsom is a nonstarter. If pressed, I would say Whitmer is more viable than Pete, but neither particularly get my constituent blood flowing.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: