116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er

[rufus]

Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er

Im placing holds on 2 Trump Admin noms until I get reasons 4firing 2 agency watchdogs as required by law Not 1st time ive raised alarm when admins flout IG protection law Obama did same& got same earfull from me All I want is a reason 4 firing these ppl CHECKS&BALANCES

— ChuckGrassley (@ChuckGrassley) June 4, 2020

Donnie: Cause I wanted to. There's your ****ing reason!

[Deutsche Gopher Fan]

Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er

Im placing holds on 2 Trump Admin noms until I get reasons 4firing 2 agency watchdogs as required by law Not 1st time ive raised alarm when admins flout IG protection law Obama did same& got same earfull from me All I want is a reason 4 firing these ppl CHECKS&BALANCES

— ChuckGrassley (@ChuckGrassley) June 4, 2020

[Deutsche Gopher Fan]

Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er

Right now on the Senate floor, Senator Paul is explaining to Senators Booker and Harris what lynching is and isn’t, and why he’s blocking their bill to make it a federal crime.

I just can’t.

— Matt Klapper (@mattklapper) June 4, 2020

[ScoobyDoo]

Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er

.@LindseyGrahamSC No Lindsey, General Mattis wasn’t brainwashed by the liberal media. You however, were brainwashed by the host of the Apprentice. You aren’t just another blonde. You are the living embodiment of supine servility. You are Washington’s least principled man.

— Steve Schmidt (@SteveSchmidtSES) June 4, 2020

[Rover]

Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er

She just wasn’t convinced he should be stopped back in January when she had a vote.

Exactly. If Romney could vote to convict I fail to see what evidence Murkowski was looking at that showed her Chump was innocent.

[Jimjamesak]

Wiki says 2022?

You’re right. Honestly most of 2016 to now has blended together and I get confused.

[bronconick]

Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er

2024.

Wiki says 2022?

[Jimjamesak]

Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er

I can imagine folks are already lining up to run against her.

She’s always vulnerable because the far right hates and always runs against her. She wins because she can usually get crossover votes from centrist Dems, well those votes are gone now.

[Deutsche Gopher Fan]

Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er

She just wasn’t convinced he should be stopped back in January when she had a vote.

[Jimjamesak]

The only thing Murkowski is struggling with is how much publicly disowning Dump will cost her 2022 re-election bid.

2024.

[Kepler]

Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er

there's always barber college

[Handyman]

Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er

The only thing Murkowski is struggling with is how much publicly disowning Dump will cost her 2022 re-election bid.

She and Collins can start a firm on K-Street that specializes in teaching women to be in the Senate. They specialize in advising on "Doing Nothing When Concerned", "Being Weak Willed" and "How To Look Moderate While Supporting Fascists <90% of the time".

[mookie1995]

Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er

The only thing Murkowski is struggling with is how much publicly disowning Dump will cost her 2022 re-election bid.

there's always barber college

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er

The only thing Murkowski is struggling with is how much publicly disowning Dump will cost her 2022 re-election bid.

[Spartanforlife4]

Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er

Extraordinary comments just now from Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) who tells us Mattis’ words were “true, honest, necessary and overdue.” Says she’s struggling with the question of whether to support Trump in 2020.

— Andrew Desiderio (@AndrewDesiderio) June 4, 2020

Next tweet in the thread says “perhaps we’re getting to the point where we can be more honest with the concerns we have.”

I think you’ve always been able to that. That’s not a new rule that was just unveiled this week.