Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er
In case he is... it's not like we're automatically going to welcome him into the fold. Same thing with Kevin Spacey.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er
I was wondering why that was trending earlier...
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er
https://www.fitsnews.com/2020/06/05/...ave-a-problem/
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er
Originally posted by LynahFan View PostThe first clue was when Rand started, “No, see, when we LYNCH negroes, what we do is....”Last edited by Kepler; 06-05-2020, 01:10 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Handyman View PostYou think that is why Rand went on his rant? You might be right about the bill (I havent read it) but there is about .000000001% chance that is why Rand was saying what he was saying and I know you are smart enough to know that.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Handyman View PostYou think that is why Rand went on his rant? You might be right about the bill (I havent read it) but there is about .000000001% chance that is why Rand was saying what he was saying and I know you are smart enough to know that.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er
Originally posted by Handyman View PostYou think that is why Rand went on his rant? You might be right about the bill (I havent read it) but there is about .000000001% chance that is why Rand was saying what he was saying and I know you are smart enough to know that.
So that caused me to google the text of the bill, and frankly my response then became "w t f." What does this thing even do? It certainly doesn't say that it's against the law to take a rope and hang someone with it.
But as for Rand's motives, I have no idea, and frankly, I'm not that interested in his motives. I just think it'll be interesting when a prosecutor stands up and claims the defendants lynched three African Americans, and then the jury finds out that what really happened is that the defendants conspired to deny access to housing.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er
Originally posted by SJHovey View PostThe bill under debate has an element of BS to it.
The bill adds a new section, section 250, to the US Code that defines federal civil rights crimes. The new section, section 250, is labeled as "lynching."
So what does this new "lynching" section do, or how is it defined? Basically it's defined as conspiring with another person to violate one of those federal civil rights crimes that are already on the books.
But the federal civil rights crimes encompass a broad spectrum of acts, including interference or intimidation related to voting, education, housing, etc... If some idiot attempts to intimidate or interfere with the right to vote due to that person's race, it's a crime, but I don't think anyone would say that victim has been "lynched." So, does conspiring to do it with another person turn it into a lynching?
Furthermore, there is already a conspiracy element associated with the federal civil rights crimes. It's section 241. Do we need another, just so we can call it lynching?
To me it does seem to cheapen the definition of lynching, which is a heinous part of our history.
Maybe I'm reading the bill wrong, but I don't think so.
Here are the federal civil rights crimes currently on the books, and here is the text of the bill under debate (you have to scroll down to read section 250).
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er
Originally posted by Jimjamesak View PostI’ve stated this before but Murkowski gets elected because she draws centrist Dem voters and enough righties who grumble but stick with the team.
Now, her centrist support is eroding because of her dealings with Trump and impeachment and her right support is eroding because of Trump.
Any decent Dem candidate, of which I can think of two or three, can clean up with 45% and win.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BassAle View Postthat's good news! Any chance she loses the primary and runs in the general as a write in again?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Rover View PostShe can always try waving to the peasants more at Anchorage airport in order to boost her popularity.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er
Originally posted by BassAle View Postthat's good news! Any chance she loses the primary and runs in the general as a write in again?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 116th Congress - Episode 3: Impeach the Motherf**er
Originally posted by Jimjamesak View PostI’ve stated this before but Murkowski gets elected because she draws centrist Dem voters and enough righties who grumble but stick with the team.
Now, her centrist support is eroding because of her dealings with Trump and impeachment and her right support is eroding because of Trump.
Any decent Dem candidate, of which I can think of two or three, can clean up with 45% and win.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BassAle View PostThey’ll be a Trump *** licker
Now, her centrist support is eroding because of her dealings with Trump and impeachment and her right support is eroding because of Trump.
Any decent Dem candidate, of which I can think of two or three, can clean up with 45% and win.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: