Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NHL 2021: I Pledge Allegiance to Gritty

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Congrats to Austin Matthews. It's nice to see the Leafs winning something in June
    "I went over the facts in my head, and admired how much uglier the situation had just become. Over the years I've learned that ignorance is more than just bliss. It's freaking orgasmic ecstasy".- Harry Dresden, Blood Rites


    Western Michigan Bronco Hockey- 2012 Mason Cup Champions

    Comment


    • Originally posted by bronconick View Post
      Congrats to Austin Matthews. It's nice to see the Leafs winning something in June
      Heyooo!!

      Comment


      • So were there too many men on the ice when Colorado scored the game winner? Will this become the 2022 version of Brett Hull? And why didn't the ref see right away that the puck clearly went into the net?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by WeAreNDHockey View Post
          So were there too many men on the ice when Colorado scored the game winner? Will this become the 2022 version of Brett Hull? And why didn't the ref see right away that the puck clearly went into the net?
          Was wondering the same thing until I saw this,

          https://twitter.com/i/status/1539824532244074499
          A bad cause requires many words.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by SonofSouthie View Post
            Was wondering the same thing until I saw this,

            https://twitter.com/i/status/1539824532244074499
            If Colorado has too many men in that screenshot then so does Tampa.

            Edit: https://i.imgur.com/i9AyBBc.jpg
            Last edited by Jimjamesak; 06-23-2022, 09:35 AM.
            U-A-A!!!Go!Go!GreenandGold!
            Applejack Tells You How UAA Is Doing...
            I spell Failure with UAF

            Originally posted by UAFIceAngel
            But let's be real...There are 40 some other teams and only two alaskan teams...the day one of us wins something big will be the day I transfer to UAA
            Originally posted by Doyle Woody
            Best sign by a visting Seawolf fan Friday went to a young man who held up a piece of white poster board that read: "YOU CAN'T SPELL FAILURE WITHOUT UAF."

            Comment


            • Originally posted by WeAreNDHockey View Post
              So were there too many men on the ice when Colorado scored the game winner? Will this become the 2022 version of Brett Hull? And why didn't the ref see right away that the puck clearly went into the net?
              If you call that a penalty for too many men, you'd have to call that 50 times per game. It's whining.

              Comment




              • On the NHL's scoresheet.
                "I went over the facts in my head, and admired how much uglier the situation had just become. Over the years I've learned that ignorance is more than just bliss. It's freaking orgasmic ecstasy".- Harry Dresden, Blood Rites


                Western Michigan Bronco Hockey- 2012 Mason Cup Champions

                Comment


                • I read something about it but didn't see any video at first of the alleged too many men. Just wondered if it was going to turn into Brett Hull 2.0. After finding a couple of videos I think I would agree. No matter what it had no impact whatsoever on the play. I still want to know why the ref, seemingly positioned well, didn't immediately see the puck in the net. Or at the very least blow the whistle if he lost sight of the puck because it didn't end up where his eyes were anticipating it it to be following the shot.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by bronconick View Post


                    On the NHL's scoresheet.
                    Game Summary (nhl.com)

                    Or not.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by WeAreNDHockey View Post
                      I read something about it but didn't see any video at first of the alleged too many men. Just wondered if it was going to turn into Brett Hull 2.0. After finding a couple of videos I think I would agree. No matter what it had no impact whatsoever on the play. I still want to know why the ref, seemingly positioned well, didn't immediately see the puck in the net. Or at the very least blow the whistle if he lost sight of the puck because it didn't end up where his eyes were anticipating it it to be following the shot.
                      Having seen it, too, I don't think it will become that. He came on early, sure- but that's missed all the time and it took a while until the puck moved up the ice to where it mattered. I'm sure people will want to go over it again and again, but it is what it is, and it's not up to video replay- if it had, Tampa would certainly risk a penalty to get that call.

                      Seems that the biggest outcome for that will be that it can be reviewed and there will become more firm distance/time rules for when players change.

                      The ref did whistle the play when he lost the puck- thought that Vasilevskiy had it under his pad (as did I). They didn't call the goal since nobody noticed the puck was wedged in the top of the net until a Tampa player noticed it- and meekly tried to get it out.

                      I get that Tampa was mad about the call, but we all saw how the game was going- this was far more likely to happen than Tampa scoring.

                      Comment


                      • As a Red Wings fan, this is child's play compared to when the Penguins had an extra man for almost an entire shift.
                        “Demolish the bridges behind you… then there is no choice but to build again.”

                        Live Radio from 100.3

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by MichVandal View Post
                          Seems that the biggest outcome for that will be that it can be reviewed
                          God I hope not. I already hate the "team has the puck in zone for 60 seconds and scores. Review for offsides 60 seconds earlier. goal waived off." If they start doing it for every line change that happens prior to a goal, you may as well ban line changes during play because we'll never see a clean goal again.

                          If they limit offsides/line change review to something that happened within 10 seconds of a goal, maybe I'd be ok with it.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by aparch View Post
                            As a Red Wings fan, this is child's play compared to when the Penguins had an extra man for almost an entire shift.
                            I can’t wait for the NHL to appease people on this next season and the refs call a bunch of penalties then one month in everyone b—ches about the refs calling too many penalties.
                            U-A-A!!!Go!Go!GreenandGold!
                            Applejack Tells You How UAA Is Doing...
                            I spell Failure with UAF

                            Originally posted by UAFIceAngel
                            But let's be real...There are 40 some other teams and only two alaskan teams...the day one of us wins something big will be the day I transfer to UAA
                            Originally posted by Doyle Woody
                            Best sign by a visting Seawolf fan Friday went to a young man who held up a piece of white poster board that read: "YOU CAN'T SPELL FAILURE WITHOUT UAF."

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Jimjamesak View Post
                              I can’t wait for the NHL to appease people on this next season and the refs call a bunch of penalties then one month in everyone b—ches about the refs calling too many penalties.
                              People need to realize that the too many men penalty was nothing compared to the two checking from behinds that were not called. At least both teams got one strong one in during OT.

                              Comment


                              • Coming to an arena near, or not so near to you.

                                https://www.3ice.com/
                                A bad cause requires many words.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X