Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Another Mass Shooting: It's Those Darn Video Games!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Kepler View Post
    Right on brand for the Judeo-Christian god, though. Dude is a psychotic incel.
    He's also very jealous and vengeful. I always wondered how that squared up with traditional Xtian teaching that envy and wrath are deadly sins. Also, resting on the 7th day of creation sounds an awful lot like sloth. Dare I say He's a being of double standards? ;-)

    Comment


    • On that note, 1 dead, a few injured after a shooting at an Episcopal Church in Alabama.

      Kyrie Eleison.
      Facebook: bcowles920 Instagram: missthundercat01
      "One word frees us from the weight and pain of this life. That word is love."- Socrates
      Patreon for exclusive writing content
      Adventures With Amber Marie

      Comment


      • Oh well, it was in gods plan.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by MissThundercat View Post
          On that note, 1 dead, a few injured after a shooting at an Episcopal Church in Alabama.

          Kyrie Eleison.
          Tots and pears...
          "It's as if the Drumpf Administration is made up of the worst and unfunny parts of the Cleveland Browns, Washington Generals, and the alien Mon-Stars from Space Jam."
          -aparch

          "Scenes in "Empire Strikes Back" that take place on the tundra planet Hoth were shot on the present-day site of Ralph Engelstad Arena."
          -INCH

          Of course I'm a fan of the Vikings. A sick and demented Masochist of a fan, but a fan none the less.
          -ScoobyDoo 12/17/2007

          Comment


          • Originally posted by MissThundercat View Post
            On that note, 1 dead, a few injured after a shooting at an Episcopal Church in Alabama.

            Kyrie Eleison.
            We wouldn't be having these shootings if Americans hadn't rejected religion and God's teachings.
            What kind of cheese are you planning to put on top?

            Comment


            • The term boyfriend loophole refers to a gap in American federal and some state gun laws that allows access to guns by adjudicated dating abusers. While federal law and many states' laws restrict firearm access by respondents to final protective orders (individuals who are subject to domestic violence protective orders issued after a hearing at which the individual had the opportunity to appear)[1] and domestic violence misdemeanants (individuals who have been convicted of the misdemeanor crime of domestic violence),[2] the federal prohibition on firearm possession by an intimate partner only applies if parties are current or former spouses, current or former cohabitants, or share a child in common.
              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boyfriend_loophole

              The "law" that the Senate is working on includes provisions to close this loophole. Apparently the GOP has a big problem with closing this loophole and it might derail the legislation.
              **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

              Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
              Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by SJHovey View Post

                That's your argument about why liberal states shouldn't enact gun laws?
                No, that's simply me pointing out that your logic sucks.

                There are plenty of reasons to pass gun control laws. But "libs should follow the abortion model of red states" is not only asinine, but would be entirely counter productive and ignores reality.

                Comment


                • I've always thought that gun laws should be regional. Cities and suburbs should have outright, universal, Draconian bans with severe jail sentences. Rural can have any moronic thing they want. Let people have rocket launchers in Flyover, who cares, there's nothing to destroy.
                  Cornell University
                  National Champion 1967, 1970
                  ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                  Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by unofan View Post

                    No, that's simply me pointing out that your logic sucks.

                    There are plenty of reasons to pass gun control laws. But "libs should follow the abortion model of red states" is not only asinine, but would be entirely counter productive and ignores reality.
                    Your argument is getting more and more circular every day.

                    If there are plenty of reasons for liberal states to pass gun control laws, then pass gun control laws.

                    A few days ago you told me it was a bad idea because courts will just strike them down.
                    That community is already in the process of dissolution where each man begins to eye his neighbor as a possible enemy, where non-conformity with the accepted creed, political as well as religious, is a mark of disaffection; where denunciation, without specification or backing, takes the place of evidence; where orthodoxy chokes freedom of dissent; where faith in the eventual supremacy of reason has become so timid that we dare not enter our convictions in the open lists, to win or lose.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Kepler View Post
                      I've always thought that gun laws should be regional. Cities and suburbs should have outright, universal, Draconian bans with severe jail sentences. Rural can have any moronic thing they want. Let people have rocket launchers in Flyover, who cares, there's nothing to destroy.
                      Sure, then they bring the flamethrower to the city with them and burn down the place. Just like they do now.
                      **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

                      Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
                      Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post

                        Sure, then they bring the flamethrower to the city with them and burn down the place. Just like they do now.
                        Then we kill them at the border, easy peasy.

                        You can have your d-ck substitute but you have to keep it in your farmer playpen.
                        Cornell University
                        National Champion 1967, 1970
                        ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                        Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post

                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boyfriend_loophole

                          The "law" that the Senate is working on includes provisions to close this loophole. Apparently the GOP has a big problem with closing this loophole and it might derail the legislation.
                          Of course domestic abusers still need access to buy guns.

                          while we tell women they don’t control their own body.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Deutsche Gopher Fan View Post
                            Of course domestic abusers still need access to buy guns.
                            Says so right in the Bible.

                            Hey, since guns are a fundamental right, shouldn't they be free?
                            Cornell University
                            National Champion 1967, 1970
                            ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                            Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Deutsche Gopher Fan View Post

                              Of course domestic abusers still need access to buy guns.

                              while we tell women they don’t control their own body.
                              I would think even at the boyfriend level this would be what puts the Red Flag in Red Flag. So, I now question whether or not the GOP really supports Red Flag laws at all.
                              **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

                              Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
                              Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post

                                I would think even at the boyfriend level this would be what puts the Red Flag in Red Flag. So, I now question whether or not the GOP really supports Red Flag laws at all.
                                They don't. The GOP has convinced its voters that red flag laws will be abused by spiteful women to prevent ex-lovers from getting guns with no due process.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X