Originally posted by aparch
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
117th Congress: DEMS IN DISARRAY!!!111!!
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by FadeToBlack&Gold View Poststate Senator Mallory McMorrow (keep it in your pants, Kep)
TBH, though, too horsey. Nay.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by psych View Post
Holy sh-t, Sanders and King are actually independents who merely caucus with Democrats?? I never f-king knew that.
Wait, wait, did that mean Bernie had to officially switch his party from independent to Democrat and then back again to run for POTUS???
Until you accept everyone on here knows as much, if not more than you, when it comes to these types of conversations, your condescension gets in the way of your posts.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by FadeToBlack&Gold View Post...Moving down the hierarchy, state Senator Mallory McMorrow (keep it in your pants, Kep) earned a name for herself statewide in the past year.
Originally posted by FadeToBlack&Gold View Post... the only man I could see getting the nod from the Ds is career legacy admit Andy Levin, who was redistricted out of Congress last year and lost his primary challenge against Stevens.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SJHovey View Post
I think in the last Senate, of the 50 Senators you guys counted as "D's," there were actually only something like 47 or 48. The others were "Independents." But, they were persuaded to vote with D's on enough issues to give the D's majority control in the Senate.
I would be shocked if somewhere behind the scenes the Democratic leadership in the House isn't at least thinking about or talking about or exploring the possibility of how they can get to 218. They aren't publicly acknowledging it because there is too much political value in letting the Republicans in the House engage in their spat, but they are thinking about it.
This might be your future, right here. It's entirely possible the Republican party, as represented in the House, fractures into two separate groups. Then what?
Then you are right back to what I was talking about earlier. Who can come up with a way to get to 218. Yep, it's as fragile as your coalition, but it's better than having no coalition at all.
Wait, wait, did that mean Bernie had to officially switch his party from independent to Democrat and then back again to run for POTUS???
Until you accept everyone on here knows as much, if not more than you, when it comes to these types of conversations, your condescension gets in the way of your posts.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Fighting Sioux 23 View Post
It is looking like it will be:
McCarthy - 216
Jeffries - 212
Present - 6
So, that would mean there are technically 428 votes; thus, 215 needed for the win. 216 does it for McCarthy. FWIW, Pelosi won her last Speakership for the 117th Congress with 216 votes (of course, in an organized fashion on the first vote).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dxmnkd316 View Post
Still depends on who
McCarthy - 216
Jeffries - 212
Present - 6
So, that would mean there are technically 428 votes; thus, 215 needed for the win. 216 does it for McCarthy. FWIW, Pelosi won her last Speakership for the 117th Congress with 216 votes (of course, in an organized fashion on the first vote).
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dxmnkd316 View PostHOLY ****lNG ****
https://twitter.com/dlh2409/status/1...VKDvDAOOBvPthA
"Assuming McCarthy just flipped Gaetz by giving him chairmanship of Armed Services Committee since the current committee chairman had tried to attack Gaetz."
"Looks like Gaetz and McCarthy just reached a deal to stay and vote.
On CSPAN looked like McCarthy said â??thank youâ?? and Gaetz appeared to mouth the word â??committee.â??
(He currents sits on Armed Services. The chairman of that committee, Mike Rogers, just lunged at him.)"
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
HOLY ****lNG ****
https://twitter.com/dlh2409/status/1...VKDvDAOOBvPthA
"Assuming McCarthy just flipped Gaetz by giving him chairmanship of Armed Services Committee since the current committee chairman had tried to attack Gaetz."
"Looks like Gaetz and McCarthy just reached a deal to stay and vote.
On CSPAN looked like McCarthy said â??thank youâ? and Gaetz appeared to mouth the word â??committee.â?
(He currents sits on Armed Services. The chairman of that committee, Mike Rogers, just lunged at him.)"
Leave a comment:
-
For the second January 6th in the last 3 years, the GOP has failed to replace Nancy Pelosi as Speaker.Last edited by French Rage; 01-07-2023, 12:05 AM.
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by French Rage View Post
Ahhhh.
Present can still switch too right?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Fighting Sioux 23 View Post
No. Present (in multiples of 2) reduces the number of votes needed. Presuming Gaetz also votes Present, that will mean that 216 votes (what McCarthy got last time) will be sufficient.
Present can still switch too right?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by French Rage View PostPresent is bad for McC right?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: