Yup. It was funny (in the sad way) that McConnell described the GOP woes in the senate races not just because of lower quality candidates but also because the election are “just different, they’re statewide.”
Go Green! Go White! Go State!
1966, 1986, 2007 Go Tigers, Go Packers, Go Red Wings, Go Pistons
Yup. It was funny (in the sad way) that McConnell described the GOP woes in the senate races not just because of lower quality candidates but also because the election are “just different, they’re statewide.”
So sad when the voters choose their representatives rather than the other way around.
"Because a lot of money it’s going to trees. Don’t we have enough trees around here?”"
Cornell '04, Stanford '06
KDR
RoverFrenchy, Classic! Great post. iwh30I wish I could be as smart as you. I really do you are the man gregg729I just saw your sig, you do love having people revel in your "intelligence." Ritt18you are the perfect representation of your alma mater. Miss ThundercatThat's it, you win. TBA#2I want to kill you and dance in your blood. DisplacedCornellianHahaha. Thread over. Frenchy wins.
They'd probably have to ram through a Constitutional Amendment, since those 90 year old farkers would immediately whine to the Supreme Court.
"I went over the facts in my head, and admired how much uglier the situation had just become. Over the years I've learned that ignorance is more than just bliss. It's freaking orgasmic ecstasy".- Harry Dresden, Blood Rites
Western Michigan Bronco Hockey- 2012 Mason Cup Champions
Would it? We have minimum ages well above the age of legal adulthood.
(honestly don't know)
1. Not for fundamental political rights.
2. The line between child and adult is well established in law while the line between adult and vegetable is not.
1. Not for fundamental political rights.
2. The line between child and adult is well established in law while the line between adult and vegetable is not.
You have to be 35 to run for President, is my point. How would a maximum limit be unconstitutional but not a minimum limit?
Again, honestly asking here, not arguing.
I gotta little bit of smoke and a whole lotta wine...
I'm all for mandatory retirement. It wouldn't just remove the immediately mentally decrepit. Let's say, over 40. Kidding! 42. It would push ages for appointments and nominees down across the board since tick tock mother****er.
Comment