Originally posted by Kepler
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
117th Congress: DEMS IN DISARRAY!!!111!!
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Originally posted by Handyman View PostIt wasn't the pundits interpreting it that was the problem, it was Nate Silver and his ilk trying to be pundits that did it.
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Jimjamesak View PostSaw some polling for the Alaska special election next week. There's three candidates (one of the finalists dropped out): Republicans Nick Begich and Sarah Palin and Democrat Mary Peltola.
Both polls had Peltola actually leading in the first round with Begich second and Palin third but Palin and Begich were within 1-2% of each other (41-30-29 in the first, 40-31-29 in the second).
The interesting bit is the ranked choice, Begich is beating Peltola in both if Palin is eliminated but Peltola is beating Palin if Begich is eliminated.
Pretty much confirms my "depends on who gets eliminated first" thoughts.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Kepler View Post
538 was fine, the interpretation of it by the pundits was what sucked.
Math is funny. It works.
I like what 538 does in general, but they are not the end all be all and there have been quite a few similar stats groups or math nerds that have shown the flaws in their methodology going back a while. It is all well over my head when it comes to the math but sometimes it is fun to watch a good old fashioned nerd fight!
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: