Originally posted by dxmnkd316
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
117th Congress: DEMS IN DISARRAY!!!111!!
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Originally posted by Spartanforlife4 View PostQuestion: So much focus has been placed on getting to 52 senators to make Manchin and Sinema obsolete. But all of that is ignoring that the House is likely to go red. If the Dems do pull it off and get 52+, but lose the House, what exactly will they be able to do besides becoming the blue version of McConnell’s Confirm-O-Rama for judges?
But if they do take the House...then Kepler is correct.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Spartanforlife4 View PostQuestion: So much focus has been placed on getting to 52 senators to make Manchin and Sinema obsolete. But all of that is ignoring that the House is likely to go red. If the Dems do pull it off and get 52+, but lose the House, what exactly will they be able to do besides becoming the blue version of McConnell’s Confirm-O-Rama for judges?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by psych View PostThe likeliest current reason they’re cutting back is lack of fundraising. Now having read the article, looks like it’s the campaign arms that are cutting advertising, and they also pay full freight. There’s a possibility these campaign arms will attempt joint ads to split costs, but from the little I’ve read, that’s tricky. Basically, there is no positive reason the GOP would cut funding for these states.
There was a reason the party wanted Trump nowhere near the Midterms, between that and Dodds (plus the economy seemingly rebounding) the GOP went from a stone cold cake walk to a lot of problems all at once.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Spartanforlife4 View PostQuestion: So much focus has been placed on getting to 52 senators to make Manchin and Sinema obsolete. But all of that is ignoring that the House is likely to go red. If the Dems do pull it off and get 52+, but lose the House, what exactly will they be able to do besides becoming the blue version of McConnell’s Confirm-O-Rama for judges?
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
-
Question: So much focus has been placed on getting to 52 senators to make Manchin and Sinema obsolete. But all of that is ignoring that the House is likely to go red. If the Dems do pull it off and get 52+, but lose the House, what exactly will they be able to do besides becoming the blue version of McConnell’s Confirm-O-Rama for judges?
Leave a comment:
-
University of North Florida poll of registered voters has Congresswoman Val Demings beating Senator Marco Rubio 48%-44% also shows Rubio with an approval rate of just 37%.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Kepler View Post
"Will lie for office."
Yes, he is another of Koch's moral defectives. Scott Walker. Bobby Jindal. Tom Coburn. Paul Ryan.
These were the scum of the scum before Dump showed us the GOP can always go lower.
I don’t think I’ve seen an ad for Begich that was paid for by his campaign, all of his advertising has been from AFP.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bronconick View Post
Doesn't Ron Johnson basically worship the Koch and their dark money?
Yes, he is another of Koch's moral defectives. Scott Walker. Bobby Jindal. Tom Coburn. Paul Ryan.
These were the scum of the scum before Dump showed us the GOP can always go lower.
Last edited by Kepler; 08-16-2022, 09:09 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Spartanforlife4 View PostGOP is pulling ads for Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
AZ and PA make sense based on polling. The Wisconsin decision is puzzling.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...k=tw&tsrc=twtr
Leave a comment:
-
The likeliest current reason they’re cutting back is lack of fundraising. Now having read the article, looks like it’s the campaign arms that are cutting advertising, and they also pay full freight. There’s a possibility these campaign arms will attempt joint ads to split costs, but from the little I’ve read, that’s tricky. Basically, there is no positive reason the GOP would cut funding for these states.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
Could be just a signal to the Super Pacs to step in. I wouldn't read much into it.
Leave a comment:
-
The Fetterman campaign has been about the most brilliant and hilarious campaign I've ever seen. I know very little about the man or his politics. But he immediately recognized that a traditional "on the issues" campaign against a Trump-propped quack like Dr. ****ing Oz is a loser. Oz has no policies. He has no politics. He's running on Trumpism and "come on guys it's me, Dr. Oz!".
The recent tweets about Oz' crudite (way to seem like a normal dude!) are nothing short of amazing.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: