117th Congress: DEMS IN DISARRAY!!!111!!

[Kepler]

Montana and Ohio have a Democrat right now.

Georgia had a Democrat in 2022. Kansas had a Democratic incumbent governor. And still does.

Come writers and critics
Who prophesize with your pen
And keep your eyes wide
The chance won't come again
And don't speak too soon
For the wheel's still in spin
And there's no tellin' who
That it's namin'
For the loser now
Will be later to win
For the times they are a-changin'

Being a Doomer hurts the ball club.

[ScoobyDoo]

< Scoob has entered the chat >

No incumbent of either party who stood in 2022 lost.

Work hard and draw the distinction between the party of governance and the party of terrorism. We will be fine if we can simply keep demonstrating that we are TRYING to help while they are committed to their childish, treasonous histrionics.

Montana and Ohio have a Democrat right now. It's got nothing to do WITH Scooby.

[Kepler]

The Senate looks like it's impossible to hold in 2024. The Map is brutal for Democrats.

< Scoob has entered the chat >

No incumbent of either party who stood in 2022 lost.

Work hard and draw the distinction between the party of governance and the party of terrorism. We will be fine if we can simply keep demonstrating that we are TRYING to help while they are committed to their childish, treasonous histrionics.

[ScoobyDoo]

The Senate looks like it's impossible to hold in 2024. The Map is brutal for Democrats.

[Kepler]

I’m not assuming that at all. She gets 2% of the vote, with 1.5% Dem and 0.5% Rep voting for her, with a progressive Democrat like Gallego on the ballot, and not a moderate one like Kelly, in a purple state?
Bottom line, outside of being rid of her stupid a—, nothing good comes from this at election time- unless she retires before 2024.

Or her being on the ballot causes R to relax because they think we'll split the vote. There are infinite hypotheticals, so I don't worry about it. She may well have done more damage being a sore loser after being primaried anyway.

[psych]

Yeah but everyone assumes that 1-2% would be Dem voters...they wouldn't.

I’m not assuming that at all. She gets 2% of the vote, with 1.5% Dem and 0.5% Rep voting for her, with a progressive Democrat like Gallego on the ballot, and not a moderate one like Kelly, in a purple state?
Bottom line, outside of being rid of her stupid a—, nothing good comes from this at election time- unless she retires before 2024.

[psych]

Not even. She reminds me of those 1990s Libertarians who would poll about 4% leading up to the election and then get 0.5% actuals. People who give middle finger votes rarely actually show up. I mean what could be more "lamestream" than voting? And the ones who do vote for her will be Republicans who like Candace Owens because she's "one of the good ones." It will siphon off tard votes from R.

Except in every Arizona Senate race since 1998, a third-party candidate has won at least 2% of the vote; some, over 5%. Others? Two third-party candidates earned 1.5% or more, including the ****ing Green Party. I was being conservative giving Sinema only 1-2% in a state that has a—loads of third-party voters, but that’s all that’s needed to swing an election down there. Hopefully she’s as vain as Trump, and instead of facing an inevitable beatdown, she retires to her cushy private sector career.

[Kepler]

Point.

Counterpoint.

[Deutsche Gopher Fan]

Remember when this bish said this?

https://twitter.com/reallyamerican1/...bNzmf78V3UWsXA

[Handyman]

Not even. She reminds me of those 1990s Libertarians who would poll about 4% leading up to the election and then get 0.5% actuals. People who give middle finger votes rarely actually show up. I mean what could be more "lamestream" than voting?

Damnit I'm agreeing with you too much! ;^)

This is exactly what I was getting at. It might have worked if the Red Wave happened but it didn't. And AZ especially went sideways on her chances.

[dxmnkd316]

When mookie pictured this,Elaine had on a cowboy hat and was topless.
but whatever…

*hand gestures sign of the cross*

[Kepler]

She has no chance of winning, but she has a great chance to win 1-2% in a state where elections are decided by that amount.

Not even. She reminds me of those 1990s Libertarians who would poll about 4% leading up to the election and then get 0.5% actuals. People who give middle finger votes rarely actually show up. I mean what could be more "lamestream" than voting? And the ones who do vote for her will be Republicans who like Candace Owens because she's "one of the good ones." It will siphon off tard votes from R.

[Handyman]

She has no chance of winning, but she has a great chance to win 1-2% in a state where elections are decided by that amount.

Yeah but everyone assumes that 1-2% would be Dem voters...they wouldn't.

[mookie1995]

Pictured, a SFW version of Mookie's dream. With the exact same facial expressions on both.

When mookie pictured this,Elaine had on a cowboy hat and was topless.
but whatever…

[Kepler]