But let's be real...There are 40 some other teams and only two alaskan teams...the day one of us wins something big will be the day I transfer to UAA
Originally posted by Doyle Woody
Best sign by a visting Seawolf fan Friday went to a young man who held up a piece of white poster board that read: "YOU CAN'T SPELL FAILURE WITHOUT UAF."
A tie would have been nice. But Iran over Wales is the next best result.
Yeah, a draw (ideally a scoreless draw) would have been the best possible result. It would have kept open the possibility of advancing on 2 points...which would have been crazy.
But, Iran over Wales means that USA likely just need a victory over Iran to advance, and takes off at least some of the pressure today. Wales over Iran would have put a lot of pressure to get a result today. Instead, if USA take 4+ points in their last two matches, they are guaranteed to advance. Even a loss today (provided it isn't an absolute bloodbath) likely presents a scenario where any victory over Iran is enough to advance.
North Dakota National Champions: 1959, 1963, 1980, 1982, 1987, 1997, 2000, 2016
Bit of deep cut on my part. I don’t know if it exists elsewhere but, in the US, it’s traditional for the referee who gives the first red card of a tournament to buy all the referees ice cream (a cheap variety pack of bars or cones is acceptable). If it’s a small group and everyone is of age then a round of drinks is acceptable too.
But let's be real...There are 40 some other teams and only two alaskan teams...the day one of us wins something big will be the day I transfer to UAA
Originally posted by Doyle Woody
Best sign by a visting Seawolf fan Friday went to a young man who held up a piece of white poster board that read: "YOU CAN'T SPELL FAILURE WITHOUT UAF."
Yeah, a draw (ideally a scoreless draw) would have been the best possible result. It would have kept open the possibility of advancing on 2 points...which would have been crazy.
But, Iran over Wales means that USA likely just need a victory over Iran to advance, and takes off at least some of the pressure today. Wales over Iran would have put a lot of pressure to get a result today. Instead, if USA take 4+ points in their last two matches, they are guaranteed to advance. Even a loss today (provided it isn't an absolute bloodbath) likely presents a scenario where any victory over Iran is enough to advance.
A US loss today means they would need a win over Iran along with Wales either not winning against England or Wales winning but not making up the goal difference.
But let's be real...There are 40 some other teams and only two alaskan teams...the day one of us wins something big will be the day I transfer to UAA
Originally posted by Doyle Woody
Best sign by a visting Seawolf fan Friday went to a young man who held up a piece of white poster board that read: "YOU CAN'T SPELL FAILURE WITHOUT UAF."
But let's be real...There are 40 some other teams and only two alaskan teams...the day one of us wins something big will be the day I transfer to UAA
Originally posted by Doyle Woody
Best sign by a visting Seawolf fan Friday went to a young man who held up a piece of white poster board that read: "YOU CAN'T SPELL FAILURE WITHOUT UAF."
Bit of deep cut on my part. I don’t know if it exists elsewhere but, in the US, it’s traditional for the referee who gives the first red card of a tournament to buy all the referees ice cream (a cheap variety pack of bars or cones is acceptable). If it’s a small group and everyone is of age then a round of drinks is acceptable too.
A US loss today means they would need a win over Iran along with Wales either not winning against England or Wales winning but not making up the goal difference.
Yes. Takes a lot of pressure off today's game.
I think Wales (without their top GK) beating England...and doing so by multiple goals...is highly unlikely. Realistically, so long as the US don't get their doors blown off today, a win over Iran is likely all that is necessary to advance. Of course, if the US knocks off both Iran and England, USA will finish top in the group and likely avoid Netherlands in the second round.
North Dakota National Champions: 1959, 1963, 1980, 1982, 1987, 1997, 2000, 2016
Jimjamesak, as to the offside call on the Ecuador goal before half, how much influence on the gk (if any) is necessary? Is it purely a judgment call? The keeper was already diving to his right when the ball was deflected.
North Dakota National Champions: 1959, 1963, 1980, 1982, 1987, 1997, 2000, 2016
Comment