POTUS 45.65: I'm Just Here For The Lincoln Project Ads

[Kepler]

(don't care didn't listen)

Stop laying down false equivalency and cover for authoritarians who are destroying democracy.

This is it, dude. This is your time. Either you pass that test or fail. It's not my test.

It's the test to be human.

[MichVandal]

Thank you for your personal insights.

So what is it, exactly, that you stand for? Just asking a simple question.

I'll even let you dictate the subject.

[Handyman]

Why are you questioning The Questioneer? They aren't going to answer and aren't interesting in having a real discussion.

[Deutsche Gopher Fan]

Dump fans getting kicked out of more baseball games

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...ZPszfqjYtOM9Ns

[RaceBoarder]

Dump fans getting kicked out of more baseball games

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...ZPszfqjYtOM9Ns

This is not going to die and in fact we are just seeing the tip of the iceberg here. These people are gonna take these beliefs to the grave and that is a frightening thought...

[Deutsche Gopher Fan]

This is not going to die and in fact we are just seeing the tip of the iceberg here. These people are gonna take these beliefs to the grave and that is a frightening thought...

Maybe they’ll hit their graves soon.

[RaceBoarder]

Maybe they’ll hit their graves soon.

We've removed all the warning labels regarding COVID, so now the ball is in Darwin's court.

[dxmnkd316]

A lot of that started before half the country realized we have a policing problem. Some cities did it in the 80s and 90s to stop anti-abortion groups from protesting in front of the homes of abortion providers.

Frankly, I can't say that I disagree. If you want to have a public protest, that's your right - have it in a busy park, public square, or downtown area. Doing it just off someone's doorstep is targeted harassment of a specific individual just because you disagree with their actions or opinions, and even social media sites have rules in their ToS about that behavior.

Tend to agree. The neighbors end up paying a price and that's not acceptable. Obviously it's more than just that. Just my quick take.

[Deutsche Gopher Fan]

So what is it, exactly, that you stand for? Just asking a simple question.

I'll even let you dictate the subject.

No one should answer his questions til he gives his stance on say, this

https://mobile.twitter.com/AriBerman...57951301066754

[rufus]

Thank you for your personal insights.

You're welcome. someday I'll regale you with my skills at the firing range, you sanctimonious twat.

[rufus]

This is not going to die and in fact we are just seeing the tip of the iceberg here. These people are gonna take these beliefs to the grave and that is a frightening thought...

This is the least we can expect. Gonna get a lot worse once the shooting starts.

[MichVandal]

No one should answer his questions til he gives his stance on say, this

https://mobile.twitter.com/AriBerman...57951301066754

I honestly wonder if all of that is even legal. It seems pretty crazy that an election can just be overturned, just like in Belarus.

[Deutsche Gopher Fan]

I honestly wonder if all of that is even legal. It seems pretty crazy that an election can just be overturned, just like in Belarus.

But there’s fraud! They’ll tell ya

[psych]

Reid (D-NV) did it first. <-- historic fact.
And at that time PCM and I were saying don't do it because it's Pandora's box.

Who does it next is up for betting in Vegas, because it's speculation; we don't know. If you made me parlay $20, yeah, $15 would be on McConnell. (The other $5 would be on Sen. AOC when she has Schumer's seat and is majority leader; this speculative thing is fun. I see why y'all get off on it.)

I think you’re misreading the room here. I’d say 80% of posters want the filibuster abolished, so why would we be upset if Democrats started the process? 80% of us are mad at a handful Democrats for not finishing it now, while there’s still time. It’s not Pandora’s box. The filibuster itself is Pandora’s box. Do other (developed) countries suffer from majority rule in their government? What’s so special about 60 people versus 67 versus 51? 51 = legislation passing. 60 and 67 = inertia, which helps the rich stay, and get, richer.
Yeah, whenever the GOP inevitably regains control of the trifecta, having the filibuster gone would mean Republicans could pass whatever they want, but since they only give a **** about tax cuts, and that can be passed through budget reconciliation anyways, what’s the difference? Only Democrats want to pass legislation that requires 60 votes.

Kep, their (Hovey, Sic, etc.) sh-t gets accurately called out all the time on here. You think they care? Just because they deflect and look ****ing stupid doing it, doesn’t mean they’re changing their viewpoints. Sure, they’re knowledgeable on certain subjects, just like all of us, but when they get called out, I can’t say I’ve seen a mea culpa from either of them, much less a changed mind.

[psych]

But there’s fraud! They’ll tell ya

As we’ve been lectured, as long as it appears to someone, with goodness in his or her heart, that voter fraud is happening, it’s natural, and understandable, to respond by restricting voting access.