POTUS 45.65: I'm Just Here For The Lincoln Project Ads

[Kepler]

Well, it’s a good thing we’ve never done that to other countries…

We are completely supportive of democracy and self-determination as long as the people pick the right person.

[MichVandal]

We are completely supportive of democracy and self-determination as long as the people pick the right person.

Very much the laugh of the day!

[bronconick]

No they won't. Because that would necessitate a response and killing even a former president of the United States would usually get your country flattened.

The USS Liberty says otherwise.

[Handyman]

https://twitter.com/pbump/status/1567549164975685633

I walked through the 100-odd classified documents found at Mar-a-Lago, detailing what level of classification markings they carried, what those meant and where they were found.

[MichVandal]

https://twitter.com/pbump/status/1567549164975685633

"but that also says there are documents that he owns, right? How else would there be just one document in a box?" says a concerned sic

I assume that the TS documents are the ones where they put the very special ones, right? About people or nuclear info?

[aparch]

"but that also says there are documents that he owns, right? How else would there be just one document in a box?" says a concerned sic.

Which is the equivalent to jamming a confidential finance report from the CFO in your box of desk doo-dads and knick knacks hoping that security doesn't notice on the way out as you leave the company. And then the company realizing you have said financial report a year later.

Conservatives wanted the Government to be run like a business, and they got it.

[MichVandal]

Which is the equivalent to jamming a confidential finance report from the CFO in your box of desk doo-dads and knick knacks hoping that security doesn't notice on the way out as you leave the company. And then the company realizing you have said financial report a year later.

Conservatives wanted the Government to be run like a business, and they got it.

From some other lawyer analysis I've seen- if you find illegal *stuff* while doing a legal search for other documents, they can be used against that person. But I'm sure this will only apply to the "right" people according to sic.

[Handyman]

Which is the equivalent to jamming a confidential finance report from the CFO in your box of desk doo-dads and knick knacks hoping that security doesn't notice on the way out as you leave the company. And then the company realizing you have said financial report a year later.

Conservatives wanted the Government to be run like a business, and they got it.

This is the best breakdown I have seen. Well done!

[dxmnkd316]

Well, it’s a good thing we’ve never done that to other countries…

It helps when you're the biggest, swingiest dick.

[dxmnkd316]

The USS Liberty says otherwise.

You might be right, I don't think the situation is the same should they assassinate a former US President on US soil.

[RaceBoarder]

Sadly yes... If Dump refuses to bite his Cyanide capsule, things get mighty hairy for his employer to come after him, no matter how dirty he is.

[burd]

From some other lawyer analysis I've seen- if you find illegal *stuff* while doing a legal search for other documents, they can be used against that person. But I'm sure this will only apply to the "right" people according to sic.

I didn't practice crim law, but it seems the following language from the 4th A suggests it's not that simple:

"and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Might be an "incremental step" situation. Mrs. uno will know.

[dxmnkd316]

I didn't practice crim law, but it seems the following language from the 4th A suggests it's not that simple:

"and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Might be an "incremental step" situation. Mrs. uno will know.

I thought they basically go back and ask the judge to amend the warrant? As long as it's found within the boundaries of the existing warrant, it's not poisoned. I thought I remember Orin Kerr describing that a week or two ago but could be mistaken.

Edit: Meaning, if the warrant says you can search the person's safe for drugs, if you also find evidence they kidnapped the Lindbergh baby in the safe, it's not automatically inadmissible.

[LynahFan]

I thought they basically go back and ask the judge to amend the warrant? As long as it's found within the boundaries of the existing warrant, it's not poisoned. I thought I remember Orin Kerr describing that a week or two ago but could be mistaken.

Edit: Meaning, if the warrant says you can search the person's safe for drugs, if you also find evidence they kidnapped the Lindbergh baby in the safe, it's not automatically inadmissible.

But it also has to be truly an “accidental” discovery. If you get a warrant to search for a stolen car, you can’t rifle through the papers in a filing cabinet because there’s no reasonable possibility that you’d find the car there. Now if your warrant is to look for papers, then pretty much anywhere that papers might reasonably be stashed would be in bounds.

[MichVandal]

Edit: Meaning, if the warrant says you can search the person's safe for drugs, if you also find evidence they kidnapped the Lindbergh baby in the safe, it's not automatically inadmissible.

That's how it was explained. They may be finding state secrets that were a crime to take, but if they find other criminal paperwork within those documents, they can be used.

Or put a more relatable way- if you are found with drugs when you are being searched for trafficking alcohol, the drug charges can be brought.