POTUS 45.65: I'm Just Here For The Lincoln Project Ads

[Chuck Murray]

God, it's hilarious, reading the breathless optimism on here for the latest speculation of how "the walls are closing in". Go back 4-5 years and plug in "Bob Mueller" for "Jack Smith", and it's like the same tired old BS. Deja vu ...

[French Rage]

Does the article link to what specifically Jack Smith wrote/said? I just want to see something solid in writing before I put too much faith in the article.

[MichVandal]

Or that he intended to, and just never got the consideration he wanted. Whether that was a big cash payment, help with election interference, help with covering up crimes, for negotiation to try and avoid extradition if he were to flee charges, etc. is irrelevant.

I’m sure people like sic will point out that he was allowed to as president. So it’s ok.

[rufus]

It doesn't have to amount to that big a thing. it's just they believe they know now why he wanted them.

It could be something as small as he wanted them as evidence to prove some kind of point against his perceived political enemies. Or he just wanted to show them off.

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Does that mean they can prove he sold secrets?

Or that he intended to, and just never got the consideration he wanted. Whether that was a big cash payment, help with election interference, help with covering up crimes, for negotiation to try and avoid extradition if he were to flee charges, etc. is irrelevant.

[Kepler]

Trump’s Secret Documents Case Just Got Worse For Him

Prosecutors now claim they can prove his motive, filling a major question in the case.

Does that mean they can prove he sold secrets?

[French Rage]

“Yes, yes, yes, of course I engaged in insurrection against the US. But it’s a-okay, because I never took an oath as a officer of the US.”


That’s really the best his lawyers could come up with?

How long until we get "my fingers were crossed when I took the oath"?

[Handyman]

“Yes, yes, yes, of course I engaged in insurrection against the US. But it’s a-okay, because I never took an oath as a officer of the US.”


That’s really the best his lawyers could come up with?

Well he has publicly destroyed the rest of their arguments so...yes? Same issue in the documents case!

I mean it is either this orthe shouldn't be charged because he was too stupid to pull it off".

[Slap Shot]

Trump’s Secret Documents Case Just Got Worse For Him

Prosecutors now claim they can prove his motive, filling a major question in the case.

[LynahFan]

I mean...it is creative at least. Has about as good of a chance of working as I do of winning the Powerball but I still bought a ticket ;^)

“Yes, yes, yes, of course I engaged in insurrection against the US. But it’s a-okay, because I never took an oath as a officer of the US.”


That’s really the best his lawyers could come up with?

[Handyman]

Umm...

Later on Wednesday, Trump, theclear polling leader in the Republican presidential race,complimented the intelligence of Hezbollah, which has been designated a terrorist organization by the United States. The Iran-aligned group, based in Lebanon, exchanged fire with Israeli forces on the country’s northern border Wednesday.

“You know, Hezbollah is very smart,” Trump said. “They’re all very smart.”

Beyond the fact that he spit in the face of an ally...he cant even get the terrorist org right! But somehow Biden is the senile one...

[Handyman]

EL-OH-EL: Trump, and his lawyers, just submitted as a defense, to the 14th Ammendment and election disqualification in Colorado, this statement:



Basically, it says that the oath he took on January 20th, 2017, where he verbatim repeated back:
Was horsesh*t and he didnt mean it nor does it mean he needed to adhere to it.

I mean...it is creative at least. Has about as good of a chance of working as I do of winning the Powerball but I still bought a ticket ;^)

[RaceBoarder]

R's have a real issue actually reading/understanding their sacred documents....

[aparch]

EL-OH-EL: Trump, and his lawyers, just submitted as a defense, to the 14th Ammendment and election disqualification in Colorado, this statement:

“Section Three does not apply to President Trump,” the filing reads. “Section Three disqualifies a person from holding office only if he “previously [took] an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State…’ Because President Trump was never a congressman, state legislator, or state officer, Section Three applies only if he was an ‘officer of the United States.’ But as that term was used in Section Three, it did not cover the President.”

Basically, it says that the oath he took on January 20th, 2017, where he verbatim repeated back:

that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

Was horsesh*t and he didnt mean it nor does it mean he needed to adhere to it.

[Chuck Murray]

Not quite as pure white as it used to be.

If nothing else, your posts continue to confirm you are a one-trick-pony simpleton. Keep up the good work, roofie ...