Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

POTUS 45.65: I'm Just Here For The Lincoln Project Ads

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Handyman
    replied
    https://www.threads.net/@cnnpolitics...c4MTIwNjQ2YQ==

    A key witness in the push to disqualify District Attorney Fani Willis from the Georgia election case against Donald Trump had a much deeper involvement in the effort than was previously known, according to hundreds of text messages obtained by CNN. https://cnn.it/3P2qOyO
    CNN is downplaying a bit, he isn't a key witness he ​​​is THE key witness. He is responsible for all of this and it is obviously a vendetta. (Not to mention he has been accused of sexual assault)

    And now we know why he wanted his name out of this...because this is going to get him in gaps of trouble with The Bar.

    Leave a comment:


  • bronconick
    replied
    Originally posted by burd View Post
    Assuming Garland was one, what are some things Obama would have done differently had he known Trump was coming? (Legal things)
    Use magic to get RBG to resign in January 2013 to shove a 29 year old ultra liberal into her seat.

    Leave a comment:


  • Handyman
    replied
    Originally posted by burd View Post
    Assuming Garland was one, what are some things Obama would have done differently had he known Trump was coming? (Legal things)
    Used his second term to actually do anything liberal? For all the flack we gave Biden for being a Centrist he is to the left of Obama. Hell one of the few truly progressive things Obama did (Marriage Equality) was only because Biden forced the issue publicly.

    Leave a comment:


  • MichVandal
    replied
    Originally posted by burd View Post
    Assuming Garland was one, what are some things Obama would have done differently had he known Trump was coming? (Legal things)
    IMHO, a better question would be directed at Mitch.

    As for the voters and international banks, they have already overlooked term one problems with the Emoluments clause. They will always support their worship.

    I still find it funny how people constantly called Obama supporters “worshipers” given where we are now with dumpy.

    Leave a comment:


  • burd
    replied
    Assuming Garland was one, what are some things Obama would have done differently had he known Trump was coming? (Legal things)

    Leave a comment:


  • aparch
    replied
    How many businesses perform financial background checks during the hiring process to ensure the potential employee isn't going to be tempted to embezzle funds?

    Why are so many MAGA supporting someone who could easily be swayed by foreign influence paying his loans??

    Leave a comment:


  • Handyman
    replied
    SC agrees to hear arguments on Trump Immunity Case.

    https://www.threads.net/@npr/post/C3...c4MTIwNjQ2YQ==

    The stall continues.

    Leave a comment:


  • MichVandal
    replied
    Originally posted by Slap Shot View Post
    NY AG: Trump Doesn't Have the Cash to Stay Judgment Pending Appeal
    The House of Cards is getting exposed


    Don’t worry, the sneakers will fill the void. Might as well put them up as collateral.

    Leave a comment:


  • Slap Shot
    replied
    NY AG: Trump Doesn't Have the Cash to Stay Judgment Pending Appeal
    The House of Cards is getting exposed



    Leave a comment:


  • Kepler
    replied
    It's any bullsh-t, any time, anywhere. F-ck em. Keep breaking through the ice. Kill the Nazis.

    Leave a comment:


  • rufus
    replied
    Why would who she's screwing be grounds for her disqualification, let alone void the entire case against him?

    I can't see any judge making that sort of judgement, even if there was video of them banging like rabbits.

    Leave a comment:


  • French Rage
    replied
    https://newrepublic.com/post/179339/...illis-crumbles

    Trump’s lawyers have argued the romantic relationship provides a legal basis to disqualify Willis and throw out her case against Trump entirely. On Tuesday, lawyers Ashleigh Merchant and Steve Sadow questioned Terrence Bradley to try to establish a timeline of the couple’s relationship. Bradley is Wade’s former law partner and divorce attorney, and was meant to be a key witness in the case against Willis.

    Merchant had multiple text messages from Bradley stating that the couple began dating in 2019. But when she began questioning him, suddenly, Bradley didn’t know a thing—including when they actually began dating, how the relationship began, and the trips they took together.

    When asked why he initially said Willis and Wade began dating in 2019, Bradley said he was just “speculating.” He said he’d actually only had one conversation with Wade about the relationship, and Bradley couldn’t remember when that discussion had taken place. He repeated that he was only speculating so many times that many people on social media began to point out that Bradley seemed more like an office gossip than a credible witness.

    Bradley also continually said he couldn’t remember telling Merchant certain details. Merchant kept asking him to confirm things he had previously told her, but Bradley only answered, “I don’t recall.” It got to the point that presiding Judge Scott McAfee told Merchant to move on, because the line of questioning was going nowhere.

    Leave a comment:


  • burd
    replied
    Originally posted by French Rage View Post
    In his and his campaign manager's views, he's winning dang near all of them.

    Leave a comment:


  • French Rage
    replied
    https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/26/media...ump/index.html

    Donald Trump has paid $392,000 to The New York Times to cover the legal costs from his failed lawsuit against the newspaper and its journalists over a 2018 investigation into his finances that included confidential tax records, a spokesman for the Times told CNN on Monday.
    Does he ever win a court case?

    Leave a comment:


  • psych
    replied
    Originally posted by Slap Shot View Post
    How many times has he stupidly said (I suppose 'stupidly' is redundant when describing anything he's said) "the likes of which..."?
    …have never been seen! And they call themselves Tenacious D. That’s right! Me! And KG!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X