Originally posted by LynahFan
View Post
The discussions I’ve been in when someone says we need a “safety-rated redundant protection” usually don’t go well. “What’s fully redundant? Let’s start with the second control system. Now, do we need a secondary room for this redundant control system? Should it be in a separate building? I assume we also need to run the conduit and wiring separately with backup power. Do we need an instrument located in a separate place on the pipe if the failure mode is clogging? Can we even use the same technology? Ok, you’ve answered those, now we need to get funding; double the controls budget. Now, let’s talk maintenance requirements. If you can’t guarantee to me that Maintenance won’t inspect this correctly - oh, and someone has to sign off on the craftsperson being competent to maintain this - and at or more often than the required frequency, then we can’t claim the protection credits the system is rated for.”
and so on
Comment