SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

[MinnesotaNorthStar]

Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

Soros man...his money does wonders!

I support Brett Kavanaugh for Supreme Court!!!

*Patiently waits for check to change my mind*

[Handyman]

Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

Kavanaugh’s college “drinking buddies” call for Senate to vote "no" on his confirmation https://t.co/A4gNh8q5DF pic.twitter.com/Q9iyQQDLDz

— The Hill (@thehill) October 5, 2018

Apparently Kavanaugh's drinking buddies are part of the VAST LEFT WING CLINTON CONSPIRACY!!!

Just a reminder:

Not one Republican has signed on to the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act.

Not. One.

— Alyssa Milano (@Alyssa_Milano) October 5, 2018

[Handyman]

Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

Opinion: Democrats, get mad about Kavanaugh. Then get even. https://t.co/9I1tqEKGUr

— Washington Post (@washingtonpost) October 5, 2018

This guy gets it. You lose then it is your job to make sure the next time there is no chance you lose again. There is no reasoning with terrorists so just go out there and win.

[Handyman]

Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

This is Senator Orrin Hatch waving off & dismissing women who are trying to talk to him. Remember every single Republican like Senator Hatch who is dismissing the voice of survivors. Remember these moments, these images, & then go vote. pic.twitter.com/wUJCRSnD1z

— Simar (@sahluwal) October 4, 2018

[Handyman]

Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

Washington Post editorial board calls for "no" vote on Supreme Court nominee for first time in over 30 years https://t.co/9NHJDRiGN7 pic.twitter.com/dJTp2smcbe

— The Hill (@thehill) October 5, 2018

First time WaPo has opposed a Supreme Court nominee since 1987. (Robert Bork) That is right none of the justices, even Thomas, were opposed by the editorial board. That is how unfit they feel Kavanaugh is.

Yes I know it doesnt matter...just proves a point. They join Law Professors, Christian Church groups and many others who feel this guy is unfit. Soros man...his money does wonders!

What do
-The Catholic Journal
-The largest organization of Christian churches
-Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens
all have in common?
They all think Kavanaugh should not be on the Supreme Court.
None of them are Liberals.
None of them are pro Roe v Wade.

— Ana Navarro (@ananavarro) October 4, 2018

[The Rube]

Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

Oh yeah, we have the one Bern-out, too.

No Bern-outs in my family. Have a couple general herp-a-derps, and a couple lefties, most are "let's judge them on acts, not party affiliation."

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

I have one liberal nutbar in my immediate family, and one conservative nutbar (an inlaw of my brother's, and my brother is a widower, so don't know if the "ties" still bind).

Oh yeah, we have the one Bern-out, too.

[The Rube]

Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

Lucky you. The conservatives in my family are full nutbar. The ones I run into in airports and hotel lounges will sometimes admit they don't like the Tweeting or his temperament, but they looooooooove the tax cuts and the judge picks, still hate Hillary, and the Dems really need to stop whining and cooperate.

I have one liberal nutbar in my immediate family, and one conservative nutbar (an inlaw of my brother's, and my brother is a widower, so don't know if the "ties" still bind). And when I say nutbar, I mean nutbar. It's insane. I will apologize to those that are affected by the following comment:

Both of the nutbars make Scooby and Flaggy seem unbiased. Not even joking.

[bronconick]

Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

No, there really aren't at this point. The election of Trump means there is no longer a sane moderate conservative in America.

I was about to point out the handful of "Never-Trumpers" but realized that they're mostly angry that Trump is bellowing what they dog whistled

[dxmnkd316]

Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

And dump ripped on Franken tonight at his rally.

Unreal.

Projection He’s the definition of it.

[dxmnkd316]

Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

Heitkamp is a no

[Deutsche Gopher Fan]

Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

And dump ripped on Franken tonight at his rally.

Unreal.

[Handyman]

And for the reason that has been lost in the discussion: he flunked the temperament test right there in front of everyone. No proof problems or investigations needed. He shat himself when it was all on the line.

Yeah but come on he is a white male doesn't he deserve a break??

[burd]

Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

John Paul Stevens says Kavanaugh doesn't belong on the SC. What would he know though...

And for the reason that has been lost in the discussion: he flunked the temperament test right there in front of everyone. No proof problems or investigations needed. He shat himself when it was all on the line.

[Handyman]

Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

John Paul Stevens says Kavanaugh doesn't belong on the SC. What would he know though...