Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

    Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
    I do not know the full list of "no gos", so please don't consider that list inclusive, and don't claim to know everything he was asked. But if it was an interview were the appropriate laws regarding queries followed?
    this isn't exhaustive, but you can't ask questions regarding: race, sex, religion, national origin, birthplace, age, marital/family status, sexual orientation, health/disability, union affiliation,

    Comment


    • Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
      About that ..

      Aren't there a lot of "no go" questioning areas (marital status, kids, religion, etc) during a job interview? If this was a job interview weren't some of those areas crossed? Naughty-naughty.
      The innerviews were done by people who then told tD “here comes your man...”
      a legend and an out of work bum look a lot alike, daddy.

      Comment


      • Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

        Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
        I didn't understand the "equity v equality" conversation until someone showed me that image.
        Ditto
        Code:
        As of 9/21/10:         As of 9/13/10:
        College Hockey 6       College Football 0
        BTHC 4                 WCHA FC:  1
        Originally posted by SanTropez
        May your paint thinner run dry and the fleas of a thousand camels infest your dead deer.
        Originally posted by bigblue_dl
        I don't even know how to classify magic vagina smoke babies..
        Originally posted by Kepler
        When the giraffes start building radio telescopes they can join too.
        He's probably going to be a superstar but that man has more baggage than North West

        Comment


        • Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

          Originally posted by SJHovey View Post
          In Minnesota it is a no-no to ask job applicants about their alcohol consumption, assuming it takes place during non-work hours and off premises.

          https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/181.938
          It's actually not legal to ask someone if they drink alcohol at all during a job interview, however while we're all comparing this to a job interview, it isn't quite the same thing. i've been interviewed by the FBI for a background check, and they certainly asked about drinking and drug use.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
            It's the equality vs equity conversation best summarized by this image.
            http://i2.wp.com/interactioninstitut...size=730%2C547
            So the midget staged a hostile takeover of the old guys stake in boxes?

            Or did the old dude list his box on an exchange and the midget bought ownership?
            a legend and an out of work bum look a lot alike, daddy.

            Comment


            • Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

              Originally posted by BassAle View Post
              i've been interviewed by the FBI for a background check, and they certainly asked about drinking and drug use.
              job interview != background check

              jerphisch will explain.
              The preceding post may contain trigger words and is not safe-space approved. <-- Virtue signaling.

              North Dakota Hockey:

              Comment


              • Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

                Originally posted by mookie1995 View Post
                So the midget staged a hostile takeover of the old guys stake in boxes?

                Or did the old dude list his box on an exchange and the midget bought ownership?
                I'm surprised you didn't go for the "everyone in the image is non-caucasian, that's not equitable" or "why the wall with brown people on the outside" angles.
                The preceding post may contain trigger words and is not safe-space approved. <-- Virtue signaling.

                North Dakota Hockey:

                Comment


                • Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

                  Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
                  job interview != background check

                  jerphisch will explain.
                  yeah, I know. That's why I'm saying this isn't exactly the same as an interview. It's also not exactly the same as a simple background check.

                  Comment


                  • Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

                    Originally posted by BassAle View Post
                    yeah, I know. That's why I'm saying this isn't exactly the same as an interview. It's also not exactly the same as a simple background check.
                    Doesn't the FBI do the background check for the SJC and the SJC does this "job interview"?
                    The preceding post may contain trigger words and is not safe-space approved. <-- Virtue signaling.

                    North Dakota Hockey:

                    Comment


                    • Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

                      Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
                      Doesn't the FBI do the background check for the SJC and the SJC does this "job interview"?
                      yes, but the point I'm making is that while we're comparing this to a job interview, a senate judiciary committee hearing isn't really the same thing, so I don't believe the "no go interview questions" have anything to do with this.

                      Comment


                      • Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

                        Could the FBI be investigating something else? https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/alterna...8/3638954.html

                        Seems a bit fishy, but we'll see what happens...

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
                          I'm surprised you didn't go for the "everyone in the image is non-caucasian, that's not equitable" or "why the wall with brown people on the outside" angles.
                          Mookie doesn't see color.
                          a legend and an out of work bum look a lot alike, daddy.

                          Comment


                          • Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

                            Originally posted by mookie1995 View Post
                            Mookie doesn't see color.
                            Um ... yellow?
                            The preceding post may contain trigger words and is not safe-space approved. <-- Virtue signaling.

                            North Dakota Hockey:

                            Comment


                            • Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

                              Originally posted by FlagDUDE08 View Post
                              Could the FBI be investigating something else? https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/alterna...8/3638954.html

                              Seems a bit fishy, but we'll see what happens...

                              I'll be SecDef, and Scoob press secretary, for President DGF before that happens.
                              The preceding post may contain trigger words and is not safe-space approved. <-- Virtue signaling.

                              North Dakota Hockey:

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
                                Um ... yellow?
                                It's the eyes my man
                                a legend and an out of work bum look a lot alike, daddy.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X