Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wisko McBadgerton
    replied
    Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

    Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
    I've been pretty clear it ain't Cramer for me from early on. I can live with Heitkamp (but can you take her radio host brother ... please?).
    If Heitkamp needs a job, maybe I'll write her in for Governor of FL. The current choices are between "Bernie is too Right Wing For Me" and "Certified Nutbar."

    Leave a comment:


  • Drew S.
    replied
    Originally posted by rufus View Post
    Been introduced to lots of people at parties, friends of friends from back home, etc. If one of them came up to me and said, remember, so and so introduced us when I came up to visit them at Maine

    "Nope, sorry, not a clue".
    I strongly agree with this. It must have been harder back in the days before social media too.

    The biggest problem I see is still that Ford couldn’t offer up more details as far as date or location.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Sicatoka
    replied
    Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

    Originally posted by unofan View Post
    But you'll vote R below the bottom line.
    I'm in a state where the Ds are such a mess that they can't get candidates to fill out a statewide ballot. Seriously.

    My UND bias has me leaning Mac Schneider for US House. (Mac was the center on the 2001 UND DII NC Football team.)

    Leave a comment:


  • The Sicatoka
    replied
    Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

    Originally posted by Jimjamesak View Post
    Pics or GTFO.
    I've been pretty clear it ain't Cramer for me from early on. I can live with Heitkamp (but can you take her radio host brother ... please?).

    Leave a comment:


  • Jimjamesak
    replied
    Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
    And you'll be wrong again when I don't vote for the R on the top line of this November's ballot. (I can't vote for Cramer; dude just makes me itch.)
    Pics or GTFO.

    Leave a comment:


  • unofan
    replied
    Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
    What each did when allegation became substantiated is disqualifying.
    And yes, Moore is about three orders of magnitude worse, but Franken's actions were disqualifying.

    And you'll be wrong again when I don't vote for the R on the top line of this November's ballot. (I can't vote for Cramer; dude just makes me itch.)
    But you'll vote R below the bottom line.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Sicatoka
    replied
    Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

    Originally posted by unofan View Post
    Of course you think Franken is as bad as Moore. Your entire shtick on this board is BSABSVR.
    What each did when allegation became substantiated is disqualifying.
    And yes, Moore is about three orders of magnitude worse, but Franken's actions were disqualifying.

    And you'll be wrong again when I don't vote for the R on the top line of this November's ballot. (I can't vote for Cramer; dude just makes me itch.)
    Last edited by The Sicatoka; 10-04-2018, 04:50 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • unofan
    replied
    Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
    Forgive me, but I consider unwanted groping and kissing abusive. (It may or may not reach the standard of assault.)

    http://time.com/5042931/al-franken-accusers/
    Of course you think Franken is as bad as Moore. Your entire shtick on this board is BSABSVR.

    And legally speaking, the general seriousness of conduct goes misconduct < harassment < assault < abuse.

    The allegations against Franken were at the level of harassment, not assault and certainly not abuse.
    Last edited by unofan; 10-04-2018, 04:47 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • rufus
    replied
    Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

    Been introduced to lots of people at parties, friends of friends from back home, etc. If one of them came up to me and said, remember, so and so introduced us when I came up to visit them at Maine

    "Nope, sorry, not a clue".

    Leave a comment:


  • The Sicatoka
    replied
    Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

    Scooby-sense ... vindicated?

    The result of all this: Republicans are now more fired up about the November midterm elections than Democrats. NPR reported Wednesday: “In July, there was a 10-point gap between the number of Democrats and Republicans saying the November elections were ‘very important.’ Now, that is down to 2 points, a statistical tie.”
    https://nypost.com/2018/10/03/democr...ing-the-right/

    Leave a comment:


  • The Sicatoka
    replied
    Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

    Originally posted by unofan View Post
    Franken was never accused of abuse. So once again you're wrong.
    Forgive me, but I consider unwanted groping and kissing abusive. (It may or may not reach the standard of assault.)

    http://time.com/5042931/al-franken-accusers/
    Last edited by The Sicatoka; 10-04-2018, 04:32 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jimjamesak
    replied
    Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post



    This cracks me up.
    Hope she enjoys the rest of her term.

    Leave a comment:


  • unofan
    replied
    Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
    Abuse is abuse.
    Franken was never accused of abuse. So once again you're wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • St. Clown
    replied
    Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

    Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
    Roy Moore on line one ...
    Roy Moore had yet to be elected to office, and the decision was up to the people of Alabama. Shockingly enough, they didn't want the man who was 30+ and chasing after high school girls. Times were different then.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Sicatoka
    replied
    Re: SCOTUS 13: Confirmation consternation contemplation

    Originally posted by rufus View Post
    Roy Moore wasn't a sitting Senator.
    But he was well on his way to being one. (An R in AL.)

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X