Originally posted by bronconick
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
CCT '77 & '78
4 kids
8 grandsons (BCA 7/09, CJA 5/14, JDL 8/14, JFL 6/16, PJL 7/18, TJL 1/22, BRL 6/23, NDL 2/24)
2 granddaughters (EML 4/18, LCL 5/20)
?€Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.?€
- Benjamin Franklin
Banned from the St. Lawrence University Facebook page - March 2016 (But I got better).
I want to live forever. So far, so good.
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by burd View PostI have no doubt his administration will fight the battle for the fossil fuel industry. And you are right, we should be aggressively promoting the use solar energy, as Obama did.
The outward rationale is that it 'helps domestic production and creates jobs'. Never mind that at best case its neutral on both, while making products and svcs more expensive for consumers and likely resulting in a trade war in an unrelated industry. But likely his real rationale is to deal a blow to alternatives and give the fossils a leg up.
From an environmentally friendly standpoint, its of course the right thing to continue to drive alternatives. But the purely economic reason...is that it keeps American innovation focused on a whole technology frontier. It gives us a sandbox to play in. And it is US innovation that is a cornerstone of what keeps us at the forefront of global competition.Go Gophers!
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by 5mn_Major View PostI believe youre right and youre right.
The outward rationale is that it 'helps domestic production and creates jobs'. Never mind that at best case its neutral on both, while making products and svcs more expensive for consumers and likely resulting in a trade war in an unrelated industry. But likely his real rationale is to deal a blow to alternatives and give the fossils a leg up.
From an environmentally friendly standpoint, its of course the right thing to continue to drive alternatives. But the purely economic reason...is that it keeps American innovation focused on a whole technology frontier. It gives us a sandbox to play in. And it is US innovation that is a cornerstone of what keeps us at the forefront of global competition.**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View PostAnd going back to a fossil fuel focused Government is going to send all our scientists to other nations. We'll be the "dirty" country.CCT '77 & '78
4 kids
8 grandsons (BCA 7/09, CJA 5/14, JDL 8/14, JFL 6/16, PJL 7/18, TJL 1/22, BRL 6/23, NDL 2/24)
2 granddaughters (EML 4/18, LCL 5/20)
?€Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.?€
- Benjamin Franklin
Banned from the St. Lawrence University Facebook page - March 2016 (But I got better).
I want to live forever. So far, so good.
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by joecct View PostAt least we don't have athletes puking and wearing masks because the air was so foul due to pollution as it was last month in Delhi. (Yet?)**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by bronconick View Post
I always stay professional on the outside but on the inside I am always saying "Isn't that the whole **** point of you coming to this appointment?"In the immortal words of Jean Paul Sartre, 'Au revoir, gopher'.
Originally posted by burdI look at some people and I just know they do it doggy style. No way they're getting close to my kids.
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by WisconsinWildcard View PostA not so infrequent occurrence that we like to joke about is when you tell something to a patient that is not what they want to hear and they reply "Well that is just your opinion."
I always stay professional on the outside but on the inside I am always saying "Isn't that the whole **** point of you coming to this appointment?"**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View PostI'm in the 34%. I would never do that to a professional. Ever. I may get another opinion, depending on what it is, but I would never do that.
It is pretty demoralizing to have a decade of formal education thrown aside by someone who googled something. Or someone who "knows their body" who is forgetting that it is my job to know everyone's body. I often wonder if other professionals have this? I do not find myself arguing with my dentist, mechanic, lawyer, insurance salesman etc.In the immortal words of Jean Paul Sartre, 'Au revoir, gopher'.
Originally posted by burdI look at some people and I just know they do it doggy style. No way they're getting close to my kids.
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by WisconsinWildcard View PostI very frequently offer a second opinion in those cases. What it turns out to be is they just want me to tell them what they have already concluded/want, not that they think that I am wrong.
It is pretty demoralizing to have a decade of formal education thrown aside by someone who googled something. Or someone who "knows their body" who is forgetting that it is my job to know everyone's body. I often wonder if other professionals have this? I do not find myself arguing with my dentist, mechanic, lawyer, insurance salesman etc.**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.
Comment
-
Originally posted by joecct View PostAt least we don't have athletes puking and wearing masks because the air was so foul due to pollution as it was last month in Delhi. (Yet?)
Today's GOP crew, and those who support them, don't believe in protecting the environment. So get ready to go back to 1970's air quality.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by joecct View PostUPDATE: An earthquake with a magnitude of 7.9 occurred 175 miles off the southeast coast of Kodiak, Alaska, prompting tsunami warnings and watches. Initially, the magnitude was reported as 8.2.U-A-A!!!Go!Go!GreenandGold!
Applejack Tells You How UAA Is Doing...
I spell Failure with UAF
Originally posted by UAFIceAngelBut let's be real...There are 40 some other teams and only two alaskan teams...the day one of us wins something big will be the day I transfer to UAAOriginally posted by Doyle WoodyBest sign by a visting Seawolf fan Friday went to a young man who held up a piece of white poster board that read: "YOU CAN'T SPELL FAILURE WITHOUT UAF."
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by WisconsinWildcard View Postwhen you tell something to a patient that is not what they want to hear and they reply "Well that is just your opinion."Cornell University
National Champion 1967, 1970
ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
The one knock against some medical experiences is that they don't bring a 360 degree look...when a 360 degree look is helpful.
For example, I was treated for an internal medicine condition that required specialist attention. The second specialist did a great job (the first was not direct enough...and so I didn't know my problem was serious). But I had to request a simultaneous diet and physical exam regiment at the same time - the doctors did not do that. My insistence turned out to be a key aspect of the whole recovery.
Every medical provider should have a complete solution tree from the top down for designated hospitalization conditions...and a referral on a personalized diet and exercise regimen should be a default.Go Gophers!
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by bronconick View Post
Comment
Comment