Originally posted by mookie1995
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
POTUS 45.23 - Wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Re: POTUS 45.23 - Wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross
Originally posted by Rover View Post
Cornell '04, Stanford '06
KDR
Rover Frenchy, Classic! Great post.
iwh30 I wish I could be as smart as you. I really do you are the man
gregg729 I just saw your sig, you do love having people revel in your "intelligence."
Ritt18 you are the perfect representation of your alma mater.
Miss Thundercat That's it, you win.
TBA#2 I want to kill you and dance in your blood.
DisplacedCornellian Hahaha. Thread over. Frenchy wins.
Test to see if I can add this.
Comment
-
Originally posted by unofan View PostJoe employee isn't in his job to invest. He should stick to running the machine which he knows.a legend and an out of work bum look a lot alike, daddy.
Comment
-
Re: POTUS 45.23 - Wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross
Oh what the heck... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HloBySIP2FE
You anti-Trumpers really are deranged.
Comment
-
Re: POTUS 45.23 - Wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross
Originally posted by dxmnkd316 View PostNo, they can add and subtract. That’s why defined benefit pensions are gone.
All the pensions (especially from 1980 on) assume huge unrealistic returns. When people were getting me going in investing my money and I was starting to get a 401K the return estimates were all lies. I know because none of them came true.**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.
Comment
-
Re: POTUS 45.23 - Wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross
Originally posted by unofan View PostJoe manufacturer can do the same farking thing for his pension plan.
If the company tanks, all xx,xxx employees' pension is shot. One might argue the company going 401k (not DPP) lowered risk for the employees by not having them "double dependent" -- job and pension. (Not sure if it's a great argument.)
If Joe Bagadonuts makes bad investment choice on his 401k he's shot but the (xx,xxx - 1) are fine.
If the whole market tanks, well, all xx,xxx in either scenario are screwed.The preceding post may contain trigger words and is not safe-space approved. <-- Virtue signaling.
North Dakota Hockey:
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Sicatoka View PostAs you said, it comes down to risk. The company can either (a) assume that risk, or (b) pass that risk along.
If the company tanks, all xx,xxx employees' pension is shot. One might argue the company going 401k (not DPP) lowered risk for the employees by not having them "double dependent" -- job and pension. (Not sure if it's a great argument.)
If Joe Bagadonuts makes bad investment choice on his 401k he's shot but the (xx,xxx - 1) are fine.
If the whole market tanks, well, all xx,xxx in either scenario are screwed.
The problem is it became too easy to raid the pension fund and "forget" to repay the loan until it was too late.
Comment
-
Re: POTUS 45.23 - Wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross
Originally posted by unofan View PostThe problem is it became too easy to raid the pension fund and "forget" to repay the loan until it was too late.
That's why I never let myself get "double dependent" to an employer.
Heck, even today I look at how my mutual funds and stocks (via employee stock buy plans) are invested and make sure I'm not more than 5% (dollars) exposed to any single common stock. By my own "5%" benchmark I recently sold a bunch of MSFT* because one of my mutual funds bought a bunch.
*Yes, I used to work for the evil empire.Last edited by The Sicatoka; 11-09-2017, 05:06 PM.The preceding post may contain trigger words and is not safe-space approved. <-- Virtue signaling.
North Dakota Hockey:
Comment
-
Re: POTUS 45.23 - Wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross
Originally posted by SJHovey View PostDefined pensions are gone because of risk. It is less risky for an employer to just give a certain amount of money to an employee today and let them invest it in a 401k than for the employer to take that money and invest it itself in such a way as to guarantee itself the money will be around when it's needed, in the amount that is needed.What kind of cheese are you planning to put on top?
Comment
-
Re: POTUS 45.23 - Wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross
Originally posted by unofan View PostA pension is not invested in the company itself. And it should be treated as a wholly separate entity from an accounting standpoint.
The problem is it became too easy to raid the pension fund and "forget" to repay the loan until it was too late.What kind of cheese are you planning to put on top?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tiggsy View PostI'm curious how climate change is seen as a security issue.Originally posted by mookie1995bc is superior to bu in nearly everything. while it is sad that it has come to it, it's the truth. if bu doesn't like it, improve.
Originally Posted by Dirty
Why is anyone surprised that Old Pio is acting like a grumpy old f^ck? He is a grumpy old f^ck.
Comment
-
Re: POTUS 45.23 - Wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross
Warmer climates may require changes to the uniform.
(That was for you mook.)The preceding post may contain trigger words and is not safe-space approved. <-- Virtue signaling.
North Dakota Hockey:
Comment
-
Re: POTUS 45.23 - Wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross
Originally posted by Tiggsy View PostWell, you definitely won't win any of them over by constantly referring to them as stupid. And that is how you win elections... win more people over to your side.
Comment
Comment