POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

So, it sounds like the Phoenix rally was the usual. Totally unscripted, still butthurt that he lost the popular vote, still dogwhistling to neo-Nazis ("They're taking away our history and our heritage!"), still promising to "Build the Wall", still whining about "fake news" (lugenpresse - look it up), etc.

EDIT: Oh, and he trashed both McCain and Flake without saying their names, which he said was "very Presidential" .

You can pretty much read the executive summary, with fact checking, here.

[The Rube]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Things are ramping up in PHO. CNN, very surprisingly, is not over-reacting to the protestors/speech/situation. Apparently a lot of noise so far, but no violence, thank goodness.

[unofan]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

By them doing that, they insulted the intelligence of their viewers.

Based on the commentary here, I think they're overestimating the intelligence of their viewers...

[The Rube]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Regardless, can we all just agree that it's either Obama or Bush's fault?

It's all Clinton's fault. (c). /oldschool

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

It's simple:

ESPN over-reacted to a non-issue.
Others then over-reacted to ESPN's over-reaction.
Then still OTHERS over-reacted to the over-reactors.

And that's how we get Trump. Ok, that's not how we really got Trump, but seems to lead down that path no matter what.

Regardless, can we all just agree that it's either Obama or Bush's fault?

[The Rube]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

I give up.

It's simple:

ESPN over-reacted to a non-issue.
Others then over-reacted to ESPN's over-reaction.
Then still OTHERS over-reacted to the over-reactors.

And that's how we get Trump. Ok, that's not how we really got Trump, but seems to lead down that path no matter what.

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

I give up.

[The Rube]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

That sure was a well-thought-out rebuttal using reason and intelligence.

[dxmnkd316]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

HOW DARE THEY BE SENSITIVE!

For shame!

[The Rube]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Yeah, **** them for trying to be sensitive to an employee and a community.

He has the same name as a long-dead general. That's it. You're basically saying that the area is full of stupid people that might be offended by a common name. Pretty snow-flakey if you ask me.

[dxmnkd316]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

This "thinking about others" garbage shall not stand!!! TO THE STREETS!

[Drew S.]

I just love all the delicate snowflakes on the right, and the Center(TM), get all up in arms about a decision made mutually between a company and their employee to A) prevent him from being the story of game B) Potentially reduce the chance of inflaming the already tense situation at UVA, and C) make sure they aren't seen as being insensitive just a week after doing a slave auction live on tv.

The kid is just starting out, what do you expect him to say? I doubt he is even an official employee. I'm personally not offended, but think it is a crazy thing to do. It plays right into the PC culture narrative perfectly. They're losing a few million subscribers a year and stories like this don't help their cause.

[dxmnkd316]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

By them doing that, they insulted the intelligence of their viewers and they made an issue of something that isn't an issue to begin with.

That the extent of *my* "outrage." I think ESPN should have just let him do the game, and not even bring it up.

Yeah, **** them for trying to be sensitive to an employee and a community.

[The Rube]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

I just love all the delicate snowflakes on the right, and the Center(TM), get all up in arms about a decision made mutually between a company and their employee to A) prevent him from being the story of game B) Potentially reduce the chance of inflaming the already tense situation at UVA, and C) make sure they aren't seen as being insensitive just a week after doing a slave auction live on tv.

By them doing that, they insulted the intelligence of their viewers and they made an issue of something that isn't an issue to begin with.

That the extent of *my* "outrage." I think ESPN should have just let him do the game, and not even bring it up.

[dxmnkd316]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

I just love all the delicate snowflakes on the right, and the Center(TM), get all up in arms about a decision made mutually between a company and their employee to A) prevent him from being the story of game B) Potentially reduce the chance of inflaming the already tense situation at UVA, and C) make sure they aren't seen as being insensitive just a week after doing a slave auction live on tv.