Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Drew S.
    replied
    Originally posted by French Rage View Post
    Sorry, because it took 3rd party votes for him to beat a far-right nutjob in a moderate purple state, you think he'll cruise in a national general election?
    Against Trump, absolutely. The powers that be in the Democratic Party love him, he used to run it back in the day. He would play very well in the states like PA, MI, and WI. I wouldn't be shocked if he pulled off FL and NC as well. Democrats need to avoid the identity candidate(Harris) and socialist candidate(Bernie). Maybe there are other McAullife types, but I think he is the one who is tightest with the democratic leadership.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kepler
    replied
    Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

    Originally posted by Drew S. View Post
    The libertarian actually got him over the line. I think the primary would be tougher for him than the general election.
    He's one of those candidates who looks great from the other side. Like how Democrats always thought Jack Kemp would make a good candidate for the GOP, or Republicans always thought Evan Bayh would make a great one for the Dems.

    The things about a candidate that make them acceptable to the opposition party are exactly the things that make them a terrible candidate in the primaries. Obviously the opposition respect an opponent who is just Them Lite.

    Leave a comment:


  • French Rage
    replied
    Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

    Originally posted by Drew S. View Post
    The libertarian actually got him over the line. I think the primary would be tougher for him than the general election.
    Sorry, because it took 3rd party votes for him to beat a far-right nutjob in a moderate purple state, you think he'll cruise in a national general election?

    Leave a comment:


  • ScoobyDoo
    replied
    Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

    Originally posted by Handyman View Post
    And Kamala Harris has zero chance because A) she is a woman and B) she dares have an opinion. The Left has already started to knock her down and will do to her what they did to Hillary.
    ^^^^^^^

    Leave a comment:


  • Drew S.
    replied
    Originally posted by Kepler View Post
    It was close, though. Too close. He basically beat Sarah Palin. It was a close call.
    The libertarian actually got him over the line. I think the primary would be tougher for him than the general election.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kepler
    replied
    Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

    Originally posted by French Rage View Post
    McAuliffe only won VA because the GOP found an even worse candidate to run. To go further, he only won the primary because no one else wanted it. He's the placeholder of all placeholders. Literally a sack of wet flour would have been as acceptable as long as it kept The Cooch out of the Governor's mansion.
    It was close, though. Too close. He basically beat Sarah Palin. It was a close call and the Libertarian won it for him.

    Leave a comment:


  • Handyman
    replied
    Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

    Originally posted by Kepler View Post
    Small sample size so far. I like her ambition and intelligence. I like that she was aggressive during the Sessions hearings. She's "Obama with Boobs" (and I like boobs) and that is my explanation for the hype.

    On the downside she has a corporate streak and, well, she's Obama with boobs: she'll sell out the hindmost to court the fat wallet donors. She's not going to reverse the rush to lethal inequality in any significant way; she'll nibble around the edges or possibly even exacerbate it like every Democrat since JFK.

    Kamala Harris vs Gavin Newsom is shaping up to be a qualifier for the nomination frontrunner. I'm happy with that -- they seem like solid representatives of the moderate and liberal wings, respectively. They're both smart and ruthless campaigners and they're both telegenic and charismatic which is good for attracting the lofos. And they're both under 900 years old, which is a nice change for the Methuselah Party.

    I am cautiously optimistic. Rover is gonna LOVE her.
    As much as I wish he would I dont see any chance Newsom runs. He is running for Governor of California and he isnt going to leave that after 2 years to run for President. And Kamala Harris has zero chance because A) she is a woman and B) she dares have an opinion. The Left has already started to knock her down and will do to her what they did to Hillary.

    Leave a comment:


  • unofan
    replied
    Originally posted by Drew S. View Post
    That election happened before Trump was actually president. Unless there is a substantial turnaround Trump has shown he isn't a good president.
    Which was readily apparent beforehand, so pardon me if I don't believe the blinders are coming off unless and until it actually happens.

    Leave a comment:


  • French Rage
    replied
    Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

    Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
    McAuliffe

    - did all the right actions in Charlottesville for his base
    - is Governor of a key state that needs to go blue for a D to win
    - would have the Clinton machine behind him

    Don't disregard him.
    McAuliffe only won VA because the GOP found an even worse candidate to run. To go further, he only won the primary because no one else wanted it. He's the placeholder of all placeholders. Literally a sack of wet flour would have been as acceptable as long as it kept The Cooch out of the Governor's mansion.

    Leave a comment:


  • French Rage
    replied
    Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

    LOL: https://twitter.com/mattmfm/status/900158567461900288

    Leave a comment:


  • Drew S.
    replied
    Originally posted by unofan View Post
    Then Hillary should've beaten Trump in a landslide, because she's essentially a female version of John Kerry.

    Yet that didn't happen. I wonder why...
    That election happened before Trump was actually president. Unless there is a substantial turnaround Trump has shown he isn't a good president.

    Leave a comment:


  • ScoobyDoo
    replied
    Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

    James Clapper, former director of national intelligence, says he questions President Donald J. Trump's fitness for office, his speech was "downright scary and disturbing"
    No ****. Never would have guessed.

    Leave a comment:


  • unofan
    replied
    Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
    After Charlottesville McAuliffe has the most name recognition.
    We're 3.25 years til the next election, and about 2.5 until the primary season starts. If you think anything happening right now will matter at that point, you're delusional.

    Leave a comment:


  • unofan
    replied
    Originally posted by Drew S. View Post
    This probably says a lot about me, but I don't think he's that boring and uncharismatic. I'm not sure any of the three you mention are a good comparison to what the 2020 election will look like. I would also add that any of those three likely would win 2020 in a landslide(against Trump at least.)
    Then Hillary should've beaten Trump in a landslide, because she's essentially a female version of John Kerry.

    Yet that didn't happen. I wonder why...

    Leave a comment:


  • Kepler
    replied
    Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

    Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
    If that **** is in the debt ceiling bill Turtle Boy will get zero Democrats to vote for it.
    It won't be. The debt ceiling is going to be clean. Hopefully the GOP will finally realize how stupid it is and just eliminate it. Like the Lannisters, the US has to pay its debts.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X