POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

[burd]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

This is honestly a great question. I've gone back and forth on it now like 3 times.

Is puzzy grabbing allowed?

[unofan]

Remember, everyone who raised an objection to Hillary was a SEXIST!!! Even the women, heck, especially the women. Dear Leader can never fail, She can only be failed.

And I'm sure that knee jerk college sophomore identity shtick didn't turn off moderate people one bit...

Not everyone who objected to her was sexist, but a large proportion of them were.

Latent sexism may not receive the press that racism does, but I'd argue it is far more prevalent and socially acceptable.

[rufus]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

You obviously missed the posts where I stated in no uncertain terms I was happy they were shutting down the neo-nazis from mainstream sites.

Wow, now that's an extreme sentiment to be having. Better sit down and have a cold drink before you exhaust yourself. Careful, you might feel a bit faint.

[Drew S.]

Why is it that you, and brent, and joe, can only seem to argue about hypotheticals, things that might happen in your future world controlled by the 'alt-left", and don't seem to have anything noteworthy to say about things that are actually happening?

You obviously missed the posts where I stated in no uncertain terms I was happy they were shutting down the neo-nazis from mainstream sites.

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

This is honestly a great question. I've gone back and forth on it now like 3 times.

If Donald Trump and Kim Jong-Un had a boxing match, which one dies of a heart attack first?

[rufus]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

And you were so close.

Ready to admit you f-cked up? Have you sussed it out yet, or do you need a few more lessons?

Remember how we were gonna be in endless wars if Hillary got elected?

[rufus]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

I'm not talking strictly about racial stuff. What if anti-trump was considered hate speech or things like that? My point is we should keep a close eye on it and make sure it doesn't creep into other areas.

Why is it that you, and brent, and joe, can only seem to argue about hypotheticals, things that might happen in your future world controlled by the 'alt-left", and don't seem to have anything noteworthy to say about things that are actually happening?

[Rover]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

You guys need to hug it out. Way too much negative energy.

Nah, people on the left need to come to terms with that they've done, for the 2nd time in 16 years. Essentially making the perfect the enemy of the good. Not everybody is going to give you JFK's Inaugural address type chills. Lefties either need to look beyond that and vote for people based on policy, as people on the right do regardless of the inspiration or sanity of the GOP candidate, or they will continue to hand total control of government over to the Republicans.

So, not voting, voting 3rd party, or making sexist nicknames about the candidate will enact or preserve 90% of what you want hands power to the very oligarchs and 1%'ers that the left is fighting against. You would think intelligent, college educated people would make this realization. If they continue to pursue the "my candidate lost not because he had less appeal but because he got cheated" then they need to be called out.

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

You guys need to hug it out. Way too much negative energy.

I've extended him the olive branch many times. He's still stewing, plotting The Grey Lady's return to the throne. Oh sh-t, that was another one!

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Again Kep, could you please run down your other nicknames? I stepped up and answered trix's question now perhaps you can man up as well and fill in the rest.

"Man up"? Well, um, yes, let's just have a little tour of our sixth grade rhetoric tactics while we're at it.

The nicknames I remember:

Tracy Flick (the metaphysically perfect Hillary Clinton image, summarizing everything about her)

Elizabeth Bathory (hyperbole for giggles, though suggesting the supposed brutal efficiency of the Clintonistas which turned out to be utter ineptitude)

She Who Must Be Obeyed (same as above)

Marie Antoinette (for her sense of pure entitlement and her initial rise to fame by marriage rather than merit)

Her Highness, Her Imperial Splendor, etc (to commemorate the starry-eyed sycophancy of her servile supporters)

There may have been others, I don't recall them.

[Drew S.]

Again Kep, could you please run down your other nicknames? I stepped up and answered trix's question now perhaps you can man up as well and fill in the rest.

You guys need to hug it out. Way too much negative energy.

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Big Trouble in Little Brainland: the creeps turn on each other.

[Rover]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

I don't wonder at all. It's BECAUSE she is.

Again Kep, could you please run down your other nicknames? I stepped up and answered trix's question now perhaps you can man up as well and fill in the rest.

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

And yet he wonders why Trump is President....

I don't wonder at all. It's BECAUSE she is.

[Rover]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Defarge.

Tracy Flick is the most on-point description of Hillary Clinton that's ever been made. It's up there with Biff Tannen as Trump.

And yet he wonders why Trump is President....

If you wouldn't mind answering the question about your other sexist nicknames while you're here for trix's sake....