POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

[dxmnkd316]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Score one for the PC brigade http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...rsity-virgini/

The internet sleuths at Reddit have pretty much already debunked this one.

It's the Washington times. They are about a quarter step up from he national enquirer.

[alfablue]

I can't imagine the trauma the great people of Virginia would have had to endure if Mr. Lee announced the game. It's his fault for picking that name as far as I'm concerned.

You are pretty weak for that to really bother you.

[Drew S.]

So what?

Is it so bad that ESPN had empathy for people in Virginia??? Even if it's misplaced- is thinking about that really so bad?

It's not as if he got fired, he was moved to a different game.

Why is it so bad that ESPN is worried about that? They are a private company, and is free to do what they want.

YOU need to be a little less sensitive, it seems.

I can't imagine the trauma the great people of Virginia would have had to endure if Mr. Lee announced the game. It's his fault for picking that name as far as I'm concerned.

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

"Man up"? Well, um, yes, let's just have a little tour of our sixth grade rhetoric tactics while we're at it.

The nicknames I remember:



There may have been others, I don't recall them.

You and I never used this one, but I've also heard Hillsa, She-Wolf of the SS. Which was hilarious until this recent spate of neo-Nazi uprisings.

[alfablue]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Score one for the PC brigade http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...rsity-virgini/

So what?

Is it so bad that ESPN had empathy for people in Virginia??? Even if it's misplaced- is thinking about that really so bad?

It's not as if he got fired, he was moved to a different game.

Why is it so bad that ESPN is worried about that? They are a private company, and is free to do what they want.

YOU need to be a little less sensitive, it seems.

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Is puzzy grabbing allowed?

If it is, the US is hosed. No one has helped himself to more chatch without legal consequences than Dear Leader.

[Handyman]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Big Trouble in Little Brainland: the creeps turn on each other.

There was no doubt this would happen. Trump got too big for his britches and the psychos are gonna follow their pied piper all the way to a different candidate.

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Rover obviously knocked off and hit the bar early today, as he's again looking to have the same fight where there isn't one to be had. Calling Hillary mean names had nothing to do with Democrats not turning out for her. Hillary fcked it up for herself by campaigning in red states, when she should've been campaigning to save the "Blue Wall", where Kellyanne Conway told Dump to spend most of October. It worked for him, and she scored a victory for the plutes.

Hillary had mediocre strategists, terrible tacticians, and therefore ran a doomed campaign. Rover, you know that the conscience of every left-leaning poster in these threads is clean - we all voted for her. Now, get over it and have yourself another rum & Coke before you stroke out.

[Drew S.]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Score one for the PC brigade http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...rsity-virgini/

[Slap Shot]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Tucker Carlson has even less respect for Trump voters than I do.

Where are you getting the impression Carlson was trolling deplorables with that comment?

[bronconick]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

McConnell privately wonders whether Trump will finish term

Well, Joe's wish that Republican leadership replace their "losers" after the ACA might be coming true.

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

I always think it's weird when I see someone still posting anti-Bernie things on Twitter and their page is filled with Hillary stuff (still). Then I remember Rover.

I know, right? Ding, dong, dude. Kamala's got the ruby slippers now, try to keep up.

[Spartanforlife4]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

I always think it's weird when I see someone still posting anti-Bernie things on Twitter and their page is filled with Hillary stuff (still). Then I remember Rover.

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Not everyone who objected to her was sexist, but a large proportion of them were.

On the right, yes. But on the left? No, that seems like Brown University BS to me.

While there is of course sexism everywhere, the left's Puritanical obsession to rake for every last vestige of sin within one's own breast curtails it, while the cocktail party company self-selects it out. Having lost both the Dixiecrats and the Deplorables, there just aren't that many sexists under 60 remaining on the left. It's not good soil for them anymore, particularly when the grass next door in the GOP is so verdant.

The sexism shield was just another self-deluded excuse deployed by the Ministry of Entitlement to explain how their Dear Leader failed to impress anybody without the Clinton chip embedded in their cortex.

[alfablue]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

You obviously missed the posts where I stated in no uncertain terms I was happy they were shutting down the neo-nazis from mainstream sites.

Big deal- everyone is.

What you are not answering is why are you limiting hate speech to race?

Nor are you recognizing that words go from "normal" conversation, to "politically correct", to hate speech as people and thinking evolves.

Seems like all you do is keep open lines for bias based on your agenda. And not the agenda who consider others words so hateful.