POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

I really don't care if it's true or not.

Pretty much says it all about you.

[Drew S.]

I'm no fan of espn. But what an incredibly weak thing to get upset over.

People like you are WAY too sensitive.

Ironic, considering that espn is being accused of being sensitive.

Us Mainers are VERY sensitive. Please be nicer to me from now on. Thank you in advance.

[Drew S.]

And the Fox Sports guy who pushed it is the biggest idiot they have, and Fox Sports has Cowherd, Bayless, and Whitlock.

Fox News is running with it now. ESPN was great when I was a kid but has completely gone off the rails in recent times. I really don't care if it's true or not.

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

8chan, the preferred "alternative" message board of pimply neo-Nazi creeps (and also known as a haven for pedophiles), claims to be doxxing every member of Antifa.

Tickle fight!

[Spartanforlife4]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

I'm no fan of espn. But what an incredibly weak thing to get upset over.

People like you are WAY too sensitive.

Ironic, considering that espn is being accused of being sensitive.

Just wait until he hears about Odell!

Tebow- supsended for life from NFL for being a Chrisitan
Beckham- prays2 mecca instead of helping team convert 3rd down= celbrated by all �� pic.twitter.com/uBnpTZ99mC

— PFTCommenter (@PFTCommenter) August 22, 2017

[alfablue]

I think it was a Fox Sports guy who got it started. I wouldn't be shocked if it was fake. Im certainly not going to miss a chance to have a pop at ESPN though.

I'm no fan of espn. But what an incredibly weak thing to get upset over.

People like you are WAY too sensitive.

Ironic, considering that espn is being accused of being sensitive.

[Spartanforlife4]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

It was some random blog and likely 4chan.

And the Fox Sports guy who pushed it is the biggest idiot they have, and Fox Sports has Cowherd, Bayless, and Whitlock.

[dxmnkd316]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

One of the comments on Reddit:

This is definitely false. Are people really buying this? The "source" is unnamed "Outkick fans" speaking to a blog with no journalistic pedigree whatsoever.

They're also claiming he was "moved" from an assignment that's nothing like any of his previous assignments to one exactly like his previous assignments. What a coincidence!

[dxmnkd316]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

I think it was a Fox Sports guy who got it started. I wouldn't be shocked if it was fake. Im certainly not going to miss a chance to have a pop at ESPN though.

It was some random blog and likely 4chan.

[Handyman]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

The internet sleuths at Reddit have pretty much already debunked this one.

It's the Washington times. They are about a quarter step up from he national enquirer.

The Washington Times (and the Examiner) are laughable. That is the crap Sicatoka used to post to try and prove crackpot theories werent so crackpot only to be laughed at.

[Handyman]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Hillary had mediocre strategists, terrible tacticians, and therefore ran a doomed campaign. Rover, you know that the conscience of every left-leaning poster in these threads is clean - we all voted for her. Now, get over it and have yourself another rum & Coke before you stroke out.

Yeah she made the same mistake against Trump that she did against Obama. The parallels are kind of astounding. She is not a closer...

[Handyman]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

On the right, yes. But on the left? No, that seems like Brown University BS to me.

While there is of course sexism everywhere, the left's Puritanical obsession to rake for every last vestige of sin within one's own breast curtails it, while the cocktail party company self-selects it out. Having lost both the Dixiecrats and the Deplorables, there just aren't that many sexists under 60 remaining on the left. It's not good soil for them anymore, particularly when the grass next door in the GOP is so verdant.

The sexism shield was just another self-deluded excuse deployed by the Ministry of Entitlement to explain how their Dear Leader failed to impress anybody without the Clinton chip embedded in their cortex.

It is not as BS as you pretend it is. The Left is hardly immune to bias and prejudice and to think otherwise is to have your head in the sand.

Want proof...remember Prop 8 in California? In 2008 many of the people (especially Black Voters) who flocked to vote for Obama voted to make same sex marriage illegal. According to you that shouldnt happen because the Black Voters are overwhelmingly Democrat. That doesnt mean they think Women deserve equal rights or Gays should be allowed to marry.

The Left is no better than anyone else because the Left is still human. That is why despite Warren being nothing at all like Hillary you hear a lot of the same BS from the same people (not Righties) that you heard about Hillary.

[Drew S.]

The internet sleuths at Reddit have pretty much already debunked this one.

It's the Washington times. They are about a quarter step up from he national enquirer.

I think it was a Fox Sports guy who got it started. I wouldn't be shocked if it was fake. Im certainly not going to miss a chance to have a pop at ESPN though.

[Spartanforlife4]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

The internet sleuths at Reddit have pretty much already debunked this one.

It's the Washington times. They are about a quarter step up from he national enquirer.

No way, right wing news ended up being the real fake news the whole time? Imagine that.

[alfablue]

The internet sleuths at Reddit have pretty much already debunked this one.

It's the Washington times. They are about a quarter step up from he national enquirer.

Even if it was true, I don't understand why anyone would've be *that* upset over it. Be mad at ESPN for empathising?? Really?