Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 67
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 16 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 template Next
  • #976
    Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

    Even with colleges, loan spending can be very dangerous... https://www.infowars.com/the-law-school-boom-and-bust/

    Comment

    • #977
      Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

      Did they actually have a final draft of the tax bill they voted on, or did they commit the same sin of "we have to pass the bill to see what's in it" they groused about.

      Passing a bill without reading it does not meet any plausible standard of "fiduciary responsibility".

      Seems neither side is willing to be responsible.
      The preceding post may contain trigger words and is not safe-space approved. <-- Virtue signaling.

      North Dakota Hockey:

      Comment

      • #978
        Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

        Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
        Did they actually have a final draft of the tax bill they voted on, or did they commit the same sin of "we have to pass the bill to see what's in it" they groused about.

        Passing a bill without reading it does not meet any plausible standard of "fiduciary responsibility".

        Seems neither side is willing to be responsible.
        If you're comparing this to Obamacare then you have it wrong and you live in fantasy land. There's no similarity. At all.
        **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

        Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
        Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

        Comment

        • #979
          Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

          Oopsies

          Comment

          • #980
            Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

            WASHINGTON — A Republican requirement that Congress consider the full cost of major legislation threatened to derail the party’s $1.5 trillion tax rewrite last week. So lawmakers went on the offensive to discredit the agency performing the analysis.

            In 2015, Republicans changed the budget rules in Congress so that official scorekeepers would be required to analyze the potential economic impact of major legislation when determining how it would affect federal revenues.

            But on Thursday, hours before they were set to vote on the largest tax cut Congress has considered in years, Senate Republicans opened an assault on that scorekeeper, the Joint Committee on Taxation, and its analysis, which showed the Senate plan would not, as lawmakers contended, pay for itself but would add $1 trillion to the federal budget deficit.

            Public statements and messaging documents obtained by The New York Times show a concerted push by Republican lawmakers to discredit a nonpartisan agency they had long praised. Party leaders circulated two pages of “response points” that declared “the substance, timing and growth assumptions of J.C.T.’s ‘dynamic’ score are suspect.” Among their arguments was that the joint committee was using “consistently wrong” growth models to assess the effect the tax cuts would have on hiring, wages and investment.
            Democrats take note. You have to fight dirty. Why you haven't for so many years is beyond this voter.

            https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/04/u...imes&smtyp=cur
            **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

            Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
            Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

            Comment

            • #981
              Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

              Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
              If you're comparing this to Obamacare then you have it wrong and you live in fantasy land. There's no similarity. At all.
              Passing a bill without reading it does not meet any plausible standard of "fiduciary responsibility".
              The preceding post may contain trigger words and is not safe-space approved. <-- Virtue signaling.

              North Dakota Hockey:

              Comment

              • #982
                Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

                Originally posted by FadeToBlack&Gold View Post
                Oopsies
                Best news I've read all day.
                **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

                Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
                Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

                Comment

                • #983
                  Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

                  Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
                  Passing a bill without reading it does not meet any plausible standard of "fiduciary responsibility".
                  Reading is fundamental. You should try it sometime.

                  https://www.mediaite.com/tv/the-cont...he-bill-quote/
                  https://www.snopes.com/pelosi-health...what-is-in-it/

                  Oh, and she read the bill before she voted on it. None of the Republicans or Democrats read this tax bill.

                  And just in case you can't get to links.

                  Most importantly, the contents of the Affordable Care Act had been publicly available and publicly debated for months, when Pelosi made her remarks in March 2010. The bill, in its original form, was passed by the House of Representatives in October 2009, and in the Senate that December. Although the bill was unusually long (the act runs to 906 pages in the legislative record, with many more pages of regulations) its contents had been subjected to intensive debate and scrutiny in both houses of Congress.

                  That’s fundamentally different to the secrecy surrounding the Republican-sponsored American Health Care Act when Pelosi tweeted on 20 June 2017 that “Americans deserve to know what’s in the [Republican healthcare] bill.” At that time, the architects of the legislation had not published any of its contents. (A draft of the bill was published on 22 June 2017, two days after Pelosi’s tweet).
                  **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

                  Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
                  Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

                  Comment

                  • #984
                    Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

                    Scoob,

                    1. Breathe
                    2. Read the statement I'm making

                    Passing a bill without reading it does not meet any plausible standard of "fiduciary responsibility".

                    3. Think! What I'm saying is ****ing the Rs for even remotely sounding/behaving like Ms. Pelosi's infamous (misquoted) statement.

                    You're so horribly partisan blind right now you can't see that I ****ed the Rs for passing a vapor-ware bill.

                    4. You may now re-close your eyes and return to "D good, R bad" < grunt-grunt > mindset and postings.
                    The preceding post may contain trigger words and is not safe-space approved. <-- Virtue signaling.

                    North Dakota Hockey:

                    Comment

                    • #985
                      Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

                      Originally posted by the sicatoka View Post
                      scoob,

                      1. Breathe
                      2. Read the statement i'm making

                      passing a bill without reading it does not meet any plausible standard of "fiduciary responsibility".

                      3. Think! What i'm saying is ****ing the rs for even remotely sounding/behaving like ms. Pelosi's infamous (misquoted) statement.

                      You're so horribly partisan blind right now you can't see that i ****ed the rs for passing a vapor-ware bill.

                      4. You may now re-close your eyes and return to "d good, r bad" < grunt-grunt > mindset and postings.
                      liar

                      Originally posted by the sicatoka View Post
                      seems neither side is willing to be responsible.
                      **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

                      Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
                      Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

                      Comment

                      • #986
                        Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

                        Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
                        Did they actually have a final draft of the tax bill they voted on, or did they commit the same sin of "we have to pass the bill to see what's in it" they groused about.

                        Passing a bill without reading it does not meet any plausible standard of "fiduciary responsibility".
                        Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
                        Scoob,

                        1. Breathe
                        2. Read the statement I'm making

                        Passing a bill without reading it does not meet any plausible standard of "fiduciary responsibility".

                        3. Think! What I'm saying is ****ing the Rs for even remotely sounding/behaving like Ms. Pelosi's infamous (misquoted) statement.

                        You're so horribly partisan blind right now you can't see that I ****ed the Rs for passing a vapor-ware bill.

                        4. You may now re-close your eyes and return to "D good, R bad" < grunt-grunt > mindset and postings.
                        I can see how you could make that argument...

                        Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
                        Seems neither side is willing to be responsible.
                        Nope, nevermind. You're full of 5hit.

                        Comment

                        • #987
                          Jealous of the rich? No. Just like everyone else, but with more money.

                          The only people I'm jealous of right now: the ones out training for marathons. I've run 14 of them, but 15 will have to wait until until I get a doctor's note.
                          Facebook: bcowles920 Instagram: missthundercat01
                          "One word frees us from the weight and pain of this life. That word is love."- Socrates
                          Patreon for exclusive writing content
                          Adventures With Amber Marie

                          Comment

                          • #988
                            Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

                            I am actually a little jealous of people with the power to get their smallest whim gratified in the electoral process while 99% of Americans see their vital needs ignored or even curtailed.
                            Cornell University
                            National Champion 1967, 1970
                            ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                            Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                            Comment

                            • #989
                              Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

                              Originally posted by jerphisch View Post
                              Nope, nevermind. You're full of 5hit.
                              All the Ds read the entire 5000 page Obamacare tome before pushing "Yea".

                              Allrightythen ...
                              The preceding post may contain trigger words and is not safe-space approved. <-- Virtue signaling.

                              North Dakota Hockey:

                              Comment

                              • #990
                                Re: Business, Economics & Tax Policy 5.0: Can a blind nut find a squirrel?

                                Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
                                All the Ds read the entire 5000 page Obamacare tome before pushing "Yea".

                                Allrightythen ...

                                What does this have to do with the bill at hand?

                                What is your opinion of the tax bill, Sic?
                                Cornell University
                                National Champion 1967, 1970
                                ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                                Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 16 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 template Next
                                Working...
                                X