POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

[WeAreNDHockey]

Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

What is there to be confused about? When nothing is on the line (like say giving a speech) he will say whatever is on his mind but when push comes to shove he wont go against his paymasters. The man is spineless.

Yup. Another example of the cowardice of most of elected Washington D.C.

In an opinion piece for USA Today Bruce Bartlett notes that "those few Republican members of Congress who voice concerns about Trump, such as John McCain or Lindsey Graham, don’t follow through with action, and they continue to vote in lockstep for every Trump initiative and nominee." They're all attention whores, not unlike their president. As long as they get their name in the headlines, they're satisfied. The truth is, any one of us could randomly pick 435 people off the streets and we'd be exponentially better off as far as the congress goes than we are now.

[Handyman]

Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

Apparently Kellyanne Conway may be one of the leakers...

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

Apparently Kellyanne Conway may be one of the leakers...

My God that would be cherry.

Meanwhile, we're not the only country with old Republicans.

[aparch]

Congressman introduces Covfefe act

Wow. Epic level trolling. I tip my cap to this gentleman.

[aparch]

President Trump's travel ban struck down by second appeals court

So when was all of this "Winning" Trump promised supposed to happen?

[French Rage]

Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

President Trump's travel ban struck down by second appeals court

0-4. He's now the Buffalo Bills of appeals courts.

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

President Trump's travel ban struck down by second appeals court

Yeah, when you lose in both the 9th and the 4th it's time to hang em up. The electoral college equivalent would be losing California and Oklahoma.

God though it would be nice for SCOTUS to rule 9-zip.

But I don't even know why they'd grant cert. There's no disagreement, here. The entire Judiciary has told Dump not "No," but "F-ck No."

[WeAreNDHockey]

Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

So when was all of this "Winning" Trump promised supposed to happen?

Maybe these people know.

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

0-4. He's now the Buffalo Bills of appeals courts.

Wide right.

[Wisko McBadgerton]

Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

Not sure I get Wisco's take here. If Trump is found to have committed crimes, Dems should let it slide because they're never find enough votes in the Senate to convict? Um...okay?

While I certainly agree gutless weasels in the Senate will never convict Trump even if he's shown on video giving Putin a bj, its certainly worth the Dems and the country's time to put him on trail. If the GOP STILL wants to stand by him they can answer to the voters during the next election.

As has been written, we already have an obstruction of justice charge. Trump admits it. You can't call the head of the FBI into your office and tell him to stop an investigation into one of your hires. If Dems are fortunate enough to retake the House next year, start the hearings and if the evidence continues to point in that direction start drafting the impeachment documents. Yes he may very well be acquitted but perhaps future Presidents will be more inclined to be a little more subtle when they break the law.

Not sure how you get that slant from what I said? I was merely observing that if the Senate has the political will, they don't need proof of anything to impeach a President. When voters in 51% of congressional districts and in 34 states demand Trump be fired, he will be. For any reason or no reason. Probably not before.

We're actually not entirely sure that the President can't call the head of the FBI into his office and direct him to stop an investigation. Interestingly, it was Comey's take in his testimony that the President could, in fact, do exactly that if he so chooses.

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

We're actually not entirely sure that the President can't call the head of the FBI into his office and direct him to stop an investigation. Interestingly, it was Comey's take in his testimony that the President could, in fact, do exactly that if he so chooses.

There are plenty of things you can legally do which will still get you fired. It's not illegal* to sleep with the boss's wife. But it's not a great retention plan, either.

* Edit: Holy cats, it IS in some places. I had no idea.

[Wisko McBadgerton]

Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

There are plenty of things you can legally do which will still get you fired. It's not illegal* to sleep with the boss's wife. But it's not a great retention plan, either.

* Edit: Holy cats, it IS in some places. I had no idea.

Well yes, I agree. Of course there is always the odd instance in which that is exactly how you become the boss.

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

Trump's America.

Federal Judge Thomas McCoun granted bond for Russell Friday, writing there was no clear and convincing evidence "the defendant represents a threat to any person or community."

[leswp1]

Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

And Trump holds a Presser touting how successful all his legislation is and so his Cabinet members can publicly praise him. Thankfully I was hanging out the laundry

[French Rage]

Re: POTUS 45.11: Attack! Repeat. Atrack!!!

And Trump holds a Presser touting how successful all his legislation is and so his Cabinet members can publicly praise him. Thankfully I was hanging out the laundry

He's switching things up, though.

Today, Tillerson is fondling the balls while DeVos works the shaft.