Re: POTUS Elect Trump II: Lefties whining and regurgitating fake news
Funny thing about sales taxes, which is essentially what the import portion of this tax plan is, is it's one of the few taxes that is mostly paid by the producers and not the consumers. It's as close to a fully backward-shifting cost as there is in business. Why is that so?
When a consumer goes to the market, that person has relatively set budget, and that person implicitly knows that s/he is willing to pay $10 for a widget. When applying a 5% tax, the state has placed much of the onus upon the retailer to either sell fewer widgets by excluding consumers who have that $10 marginal bracket, or reducing the price so that the total price comes in at or below the $10 mark.
With that said, yes, some of the sales tax is paid by the consumer when expanded to the entire basket of goods, it's not nearly to the degree that it appears on the surface. Economists have studied this tax at length, and it's mostly those non-essential, luxury-priced items and products with razor thin profit margins where the tax is least shifted back to the retailers, and by extension production companies of the goods. The luxury priced goods can soak in the tax for obvious reasons, but the razor-thin profit margin goods are for the very simple reason that the producers and retailers would have to stop carrying those goods if they were to also pay the sales tax. That's why we see food and clothing exempted from the sales tax in some (many?) states.
The biggest issue people tend to have with the sales tax is the surface appearance of going after poor people who can't afford it. It's an optics issue more than anything else.
How much of this holds up to the import tax will likely depend upon product sold.
Funny thing about sales taxes, which is essentially what the import portion of this tax plan is, is it's one of the few taxes that is mostly paid by the producers and not the consumers. It's as close to a fully backward-shifting cost as there is in business. Why is that so?
When a consumer goes to the market, that person has relatively set budget, and that person implicitly knows that s/he is willing to pay $10 for a widget. When applying a 5% tax, the state has placed much of the onus upon the retailer to either sell fewer widgets by excluding consumers who have that $10 marginal bracket, or reducing the price so that the total price comes in at or below the $10 mark.
With that said, yes, some of the sales tax is paid by the consumer when expanded to the entire basket of goods, it's not nearly to the degree that it appears on the surface. Economists have studied this tax at length, and it's mostly those non-essential, luxury-priced items and products with razor thin profit margins where the tax is least shifted back to the retailers, and by extension production companies of the goods. The luxury priced goods can soak in the tax for obvious reasons, but the razor-thin profit margin goods are for the very simple reason that the producers and retailers would have to stop carrying those goods if they were to also pay the sales tax. That's why we see food and clothing exempted from the sales tax in some (many?) states.
The biggest issue people tend to have with the sales tax is the surface appearance of going after poor people who can't afford it. It's an optics issue more than anything else.
How much of this holds up to the import tax will likely depend upon product sold.
Comment