Originally posted by MavHockey14
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
College Football 2015-16: The Big Ten Rises
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Go Green! Go White! Go State!
1966, 1986, 2007
Go Tigers, Go Packers, Go Red Wings, Go Pistons
-
Re: College Football 2015-16: The Big Ten Rises
Originally posted by Spartanforlife4 View PostSaw a guy at the bar in Indy wearing a NoDak sweatshirt, tried to talk hockey. Says he didn't follow hockey in school and doesn't now. What did he do for fun in Grand Forks?
I think I met that guy at Sam's Club when I first moved here....he wasn't sure whether or not to believe me when I said there was no way UND was going to the South Bend regional since they were hosting in Fargo. The hockey knowledge here is very lacking.Jordan Kawaguchi for Hobey!!
Originally posted by Quizmire
mns, this is why i love you.
Originally posted by Markt
MNS - forking genius.
Originally posted by asterisk hat
MNS - sometimes you gotta answer your true calling. I think yours is being a pimp.
Originally posted by hockeybando
I am a fan of MNS.
Comment
-
Re: College Football 2015-16: The Big Ten Rises
Originally posted by MavHockey14 View PostIf we get jumped by OSU the system is already broke.
I hope you go to the Rose Bowl, too. It's been longer for Iowa vs. OSU.
The bigger question- there were rumors that thanks to the playoff spot, the Rose Bowl may not pick a B1G team. ugh.
Comment
-
Re: College Football 2015-16: The Big Ten Rises
Originally posted by Spartanforlife4 View PostIncredible game, incredible win, incredible experience.
Nice to see the ACC made sure they had a playoff team.
I also think with Cook healthy (I assume the announcers were nearly correct that he must have been hurt), Clemson should be a good matchup for you. Not sure about Alabama, though (who I expect to beat OK).
Comment
-
Re: College Football 2015-16: The Big Ten Rises
Originally posted by Spartanforlife4 View PostIncredible game, incredible win, incredible experience.
Nice to see the ACC made sure they had a playoff team.
As to the whole idea that the ACC officials tried to ensure Clemson made the playoff, it's absolutely ridiculous. My guess is people making such assertions haven't paid attention to the league this season, and certainly didn't watch the ACC Championship game (other than the last minute). But go ahead and keep saying such things. You just look worse than ACC officiating.
Originally posted by French Rage View PostI'd like to point out McCaffrey ends the year with 3496 all-purpose yards, and the next closest is 2410. Henry breaks a SEC record and McCaffrey breaks a national record, and of course ESPN covers the former. Nice to see again that 15% or so of Heisman ballots were sent in before the season ended, once they decided who was the best SEC player and thus who should win.
Also, can someone remind what Oklahoma has actually accomplished this year?
As for Oklahoma, IMO, they have a stronger resume than Alabama. Oklahoma went 3-0 against teams in the top 20 (W-#11, #12, #17), including two wins on the road. Alabama went 1-1 against such teams (L-#13, W-#18)...none of which were on the road. Oklahoma's loss is obviously worse, but I wouldn't judge a team based on who they lose to.North Dakota
National Champions: 1959, 1963, 1980, 1982, 1987, 1997, 2000, 2016
Comment
-
Originally posted by alfablue View PostThe system isn't about who is best at this point- it's about who draws the best. Otherwise, I can't really figure how we are going to Orlando (which is most likely at this point).
I hope you go to the Rose Bowl, too. It's been longer for Iowa vs. OSU.
The bigger question- there were rumors that thanks to the playoff spot, the Rose Bowl may not pick a B1G team. ugh.
My point being, if Iowa is penalized for losing that game, on a neutral field, vs Connor Cook and not a back up, when OSU lost by the same margin at home, vs a back up from MSU, the system is broke. Iowa deserves to be ranked ahead of OSU is my point. 12-1 vs 11-1 with the same loss, and OSU was idle. Iowa shouldn't drop behind OSU because they won their division and made the title game. (With my point above)AF 99
M-A-V-E-R-I-C-K-S, MAVERICKS, MAVERICKS, GOOOOO STATE!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fighting Sioux 23 View PostShould be a fun game between Clemson and Michigan State. My guess is that it will be a low scoring affair. Both teams are clutch, so I wouldn't be surprised with a roller-coaster ride to the final whistle. Looking forward to it.
As to the whole idea that the ACC officials tried to ensure Clemson made the playoff, it's absolutely ridiculous. My guess is people making such assertions haven't paid attention to the league this season, and certainly didn't watch the ACC Championship game (other than the last minute). But go ahead and keep saying such things. You just look worse than ACC officiating.
McCaffrey is the best player in college football and should win the Heisman. Henry is a solid player, but it reminds me of the whole Barry Sanders v. Emmitt Smith debate. At least McCaffrey will get to go to New York...shame that he likely won't walk away with the trophy.
As for Oklahoma, IMO, they have a stronger resume than Alabama. Oklahoma went 3-0 against teams in the top 20 (W-#11, #12, #17), including two wins on the road. Alabama went 1-1 against such teams (L-#13, W-#18)...none of which were on the road. Oklahoma's loss is obviously worse, but I wouldn't judge a team based on who they lose to.
I think it'll be:
1 Clemson vs 4 Oklahoma in the Orange Bowl and 2 Alabama and 3 Michigan State in the Cotton Bowl. That also gets Oklahoma out of Dallas, where they'd be a four hour drive to the game, and I think you can logically make that argument.
Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if it went 1 Bama, 2 MSU, 3 Clemson, 4 Oklahoma, but who knows. MSU resume is better than Bama's as well, IMHO.
How I would rank them:
1 Clemson - rewarding the 0 in the loss column.
2 Michigan State - resume is better than Clemson's, but 1 loss.
3 Alabama
4 OklahomaLast edited by MavHockey14; 12-06-2015, 11:01 AM.AF 99
M-A-V-E-R-I-C-K-S, MAVERICKS, MAVERICKS, GOOOOO STATE!
Comment
-
Re: College Football 2015-16: The Big Ten Rises
Originally posted by Fighting Sioux 23 View PostShould be a fun game between Clemson and Michigan State. My guess is that it will be a low scoring affair. Both teams are clutch, so I wouldn't be surprised with a roller-coaster ride to the final whistle. Looking forward to it.
As to the whole idea that the ACC officials tried to ensure Clemson made the playoff, it's absolutely ridiculous. My guess is people making such assertions haven't paid attention to the league this season, and certainly didn't watch the ACC Championship game (other than the last minute). But go ahead and keep saying such things. You just look worse than ACC officiating.
McCaffrey is the best player in college football and should win the Heisman. Henry is a solid player, but it reminds me of the whole Barry Sanders v. Emmitt Smith debate. At least McCaffrey will get to go to New York...shame that he likely won't walk away with the trophy.
As for Oklahoma, IMO, they have a stronger resume than Alabama. Oklahoma went 3-0 against teams in the top 20 (W-#11, #12, #17), including two wins on the road. Alabama went 1-1 against such teams (L-#13, W-#18)...none of which were on the road. Oklahoma's loss is obviously worse, but I wouldn't judge a team based on who they lose to.
Cornell '04, Stanford '06
KDR
Rover Frenchy, Classic! Great post.
iwh30 I wish I could be as smart as you. I really do you are the man
gregg729 I just saw your sig, you do love having people revel in your "intelligence."
Ritt18 you are the perfect representation of your alma mater.
Miss Thundercat That's it, you win.
TBA#2 I want to kill you and dance in your blood.
DisplacedCornellian Hahaha. Thread over. Frenchy wins.
Test to see if I can add this.
Comment
-
Re: College Football 2015-16: The Big Ten Rises
Originally posted by French Rage View PostOklahoma also got to get warm in the first ten weeks and then only have to play teams with a pulse come week 11. Stanford was playing real teams from beginning to end. Stanford played 10 bowl-eligible Power 5 teams, Oklahoma 7. Stanford played 7 8-win teams, Oklahoma played 4. Stanford lost to two top-20 teams, Oklahoma lost to 5-7 Texas. The Big-12 is a joke, just because they only had one team with 1-loss this year doesn't make them suddenly good.North Dakota
National Champions: 1959, 1963, 1980, 1982, 1987, 1997, 2000, 2016
Comment
-
Re: College Football 2015-16: The Big Ten Rises
Originally posted by MavHockey14 View Post1 Clemson vs 4 Oklahoma in the Orange Bowl.
2 Alabama vs 3 Michigan State in the Cotton Bowl.
Figured that's how the committee would go.
Hope we have a repeat of the 2014 Russel Athletic Bowl.North Dakota
National Champions: 1959, 1963, 1980, 1982, 1987, 1997, 2000, 2016
Comment
-
Re: College Football 2015-16: The Big Ten Rises
Originally posted by Fighting Sioux 23 View PostTo be fair, Oklahoma did travel to Tennessee and won early in the season.
Also, Tennessee isn't a good team this year, despite being 8-4. Georgia is their only meaningful win, then they lost to UF, Ark, OU, and Alabama, aka teams with a pulse, and then beat up on the weaklings of the SEC (UK, Mizzou, Vandy, SC) and joke OOC teams (BG, WCU, UNT). And for that they got to be #25 in the CFP rankings.Last edited by French Rage; 12-06-2015, 11:38 AM.
Cornell '04, Stanford '06
KDR
Rover Frenchy, Classic! Great post.
iwh30 I wish I could be as smart as you. I really do you are the man
gregg729 I just saw your sig, you do love having people revel in your "intelligence."
Ritt18 you are the perfect representation of your alma mater.
Miss Thundercat That's it, you win.
TBA#2 I want to kill you and dance in your blood.
DisplacedCornellian Hahaha. Thread over. Frenchy wins.
Test to see if I can add this.
Comment
-
Re: College Football 2015-16: The Big Ten Rises
The committee got it right. I kind of figured they were going to be angling for an Alabama Oklahoma championship so they would put them opposite. It was convenient the teams made it easy to do that without much controversy.Code:As of 9/21/10: As of 9/13/10: College Hockey 6 College Football 0 BTHC 4 WCHA FC: 1
Originally posted by SanTropezMay your paint thinner run dry and the fleas of a thousand camels infest your dead deer.Originally posted by bigblue_dlI don't even know how to classify magic vagina smoke babies..Originally posted by KeplerWhen the giraffes start building radio telescopes they can join too.
Comment
-
Re: College Football 2015-16: The Big Ten Rises
Originally posted by MavHockey14 View PostYou're confused on the new system. If the Big Ten Chanpion goes to the Playoff and the Rose Bowl isn't a a semifinal, the next highest ranked Big Ten team goes to the playoff, outside of an abnormal circumstance. Their example for that was Wisconsin going three straight years to the Rose Bowl, and if they were ranked 6 and Minnesota 7-8, Minnesota would go because they haven't been since the 60's and UW would go to another NY6 bowl.
My point being, if Iowa is penalized for losing that game, on a neutral field, vs Connor Cook and not a back up, when OSU lost by the same margin at home, vs a back up from MSU, the system is broke. Iowa deserves to be ranked ahead of OSU is my point. 12-1 vs 11-1 with the same loss, and OSU was idle. Iowa shouldn't drop behind OSU because they won their division and made the title game. (With my point above)
Once MSU got into the top 4, the Rose Bowl does not have to take the best B1G team- they can do what they want. The only team they have to take right now is Stanford- as they are the P12 best and not already spoken for.
Again, I WANT Iowa to got to the Rose Bowl, but the Buckeyes spend more money.
Comment
-
Re: College Football 2015-16: The Big Ten Rises
Originally posted by French Rage View PostTrue, they played week 2, and then got to scrimmage until week 11.
Oklahoma is a very good team. Are they better than Stanford? I don't know. Unfortunately the playoff is only four teams.
Just saw where Oklahoma is a 2.5 point favorite against Clemson. Apparently some people think Oklahoma is deserving...or Clemson is some sort of joke.North Dakota
National Champions: 1959, 1963, 1980, 1982, 1987, 1997, 2000, 2016
Comment
Comment