Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

    Originally posted by MattS View Post
    Sad but true. At least the good news is that bombs are by nature expendable so we need to keep purchasing them. I wonder how China feels about financing another war on terror? I guess they probably like it better than a war on communism.
    And yet, Raytheon is down 1.3% today... Did not expect that.
    If you don't change the world today, how can it be any better tomorrow?

    Comment


    • Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

      Originally posted by St. Clown View Post
      I've read reports that China supports taking action against ISIS. If there's one thing China likes, it's obeying state authority, which ISIS does not do. The second thing China likes is oil, which ISIS could disrupt the supply if they're permitted to get large enough.
      They're not wild about Islam, either.
      Cornell University
      National Champion 1967, 1970
      ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
      Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

      Comment


      • Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

        Originally posted by LynahFan View Post
        And yet, Raytheon is down 1.3% today... Did not expect that.
        Up 10% in the last 3 weeks; gotta do a profit take at some point.

        Block III costs > $500k each and we used 47 last night. And it aint like they're reusable. RTN will be just fine.
        Last edited by Kepler; 09-23-2014, 09:57 AM.
        Cornell University
        National Champion 1967, 1970
        ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
        Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

        Comment


        • Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

          Resubscribed
          Code:
          As of 9/21/10:         As of 9/13/10:
          College Hockey 6       College Football 0
          BTHC 4                 WCHA FC:  1
          Originally posted by SanTropez
          May your paint thinner run dry and the fleas of a thousand camels infest your dead deer.
          Originally posted by bigblue_dl
          I don't even know how to classify magic vagina smoke babies..
          Originally posted by Kepler
          When the giraffes start building radio telescopes they can join too.
          He's probably going to be a superstar but that man has more baggage than North West

          Comment


          • Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

            Originally posted by Kepler View Post
            They're not wild about Islam, either.
            "People's Court" indeed.

            Comment


            • Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

              Outgoing Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai took one final swipe at the U.S. Tuesday, telling a gathering of Afghan government employees that the 13-year American-led military action had failed to bring peace to his country.

              "We don't have peace because the Americans didn't want peace," said Karzai, who will officially give way to President-elect Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai when the latter is sworn in Monday.

              "If America and Pakistan really want it, peace will come to Afghanistan," Karzai added, referring to his country's eastern neighbor as well as the U.S. "The war in Afghanistan is to the benefit of foreigners. But Afghans on both sides are the sacrificial lambs and victims of this war."
              Read that and tell me these wars aren't a colossal waste of time and money.

              http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/09...ewell-address/
              **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

              Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
              Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

              Comment


              • Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

                Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
                Read that and tell me these wars aren't a colossal waste of time and money.

                http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/09...ewell-address/
                The lesson for me (aside from some world leaders like Karzai need to be told to S T F U) is that you can't let a war become an occupation. Strike militarily, then leave. If trouble starts again, strike again. The two most successful recent wars, Bosnia and the Gulf War, were done in this manner. Yes in both cases we had to launch more military strikes (Kosovo in the Balkans and multiple strikes against Saddam pre-Bush II) but never was the US responsible for the wholesale security of either country.

                So, same thing with ISIS. Bomb the p !ss out of them until they go away and let local troops deal with them. If they stick their heads up again later on, start bombing again. Its far better than restarting the ludicrous Iraq War complete with boots on the ground doing the fighting for the Iraqis.
                Legally drunk???? If its "legal", what's the ------- problem?!? - George Carlin

                Ever notice how everybody who drives slower than you is an idiot, and everybody who drives faster is a maniac? - George Carlin

                "I've never seen so much reason and bullsh*t contained in ONE MAN."

                Comment


                • Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

                  Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
                  Read that and tell me these wars aren't a colossal waste of time and money.

                  http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/09...ewell-address/
                  The Brits knew how to do these things. When you want to milk a country dry, you co-opt one native group and train them up as the middle management. You stay on top but aside from the occasional civilian massacre you do little more than sit and collect the taxes and extract resources. You justify it all by saying you're bringing the fuzzy-wuzzies civilization, or you're protecting them from the bad old Russian bear (German eagle, Yellow Peril, whatever). And you let the hate-pinched-faced old maids hand out Bibles. Every once in a while one of them will get strung up and then you can declare a revenge war against the "threat to Christianity and (sniff) motherhood" and gas a few thousand malcontents. Meanwhile, the trade lanes to India stay open and the money keeps pouring in.

                  We're getting there. Our model is different from the Brits primarily in who gets the goodies. The Brits poured a lot of it back into the Empire. We're putting it into private pockets. So far the rubes haven't noticed, but ours is an inherently more risky business model.
                  Last edited by Kepler; 09-24-2014, 11:00 AM.
                  Cornell University
                  National Champion 1967, 1970
                  ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                  Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                  Comment


                  • Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

                    Originally posted by Kepler View Post
                    The Brits knew how to do these things. When you want to milk a country dry, you co-opt one native group and train them up as the middle management. You stay on top but aside from the occasional civilian massacre you do little more than sit and collect the taxes and extract resources. You justify it all by saying you're bringing the fuzzy-wuzzies civilization, or you're protecting them from the bad old Russian bear (German eagle, Yellow Peril, whatever). And you let the hate-pinched-faced old maids hand out Bibles. Every once in a while one of them will get strung up and then you can declare a revenge war against the "threat to Christianity and (sniff) motherhood" and gas a few thousand malcontents. Meanwhile, the trade lanes to India stay open and the money keeps pouring in.

                    We're getting there. Our model is different from the Brits primarily in who gets the goodies. The Brits poured a lot of it back into the Empire. We're putting it into private pockets. So far the rubes haven't noticed, but ours is an inherently more risky business model.
                    Again you fit another segment of world history into your pet narrative. You're tenacity in pushing it is impressive.
                    Originally posted by Priceless
                    Good to see you're so reasonable.
                    Originally posted by ScoobyDoo
                    Very well, said.
                    Originally posted by Rover
                    A fair assessment Bob.

                    Comment


                    • Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

                      Originally posted by Bob Gray View Post
                      Again you fit another segment of world history into your pet narrative. You're tenacity in pushing it is impressive.
                      Your, not you're.

                      Also, it's a different narrative. Well, OK, maybe a different verse.
                      Cornell University
                      National Champion 1967, 1970
                      ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                      Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                      Comment


                      • Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

                        Speaking of our Future Overlords
                        Cornell University
                        National Champion 1967, 1970
                        ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                        Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                        Comment


                        • Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

                          Originally posted by Kepler View Post
                          "Personnel reshuffle" - that's cute.

                          So in other words, Mr. Xiaochuan is about to be vaporized.

                          Comment


                          • Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

                            Originally posted by FadeToBlack&Gold View Post
                            "Personnel reshuffle" - that's cute.

                            So in other words, Mr. Xiaochuan is about to be vaporized.
                            Yeah, you don't want to get dropped from the People's Org Chart.
                            Cornell University
                            National Champion 1967, 1970
                            ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                            Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                            Comment


                            • Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

                              Originally posted by Rover View Post
                              The lesson for me (aside from some world leaders like Karzai need to be told to S T F U) is that you can't let a war become an occupation. Strike militarily, then leave. If trouble starts again, strike again. The two most successful recent wars, Bosnia and the Gulf War, were done in this manner. Yes in both cases we had to launch more military strikes (Kosovo in the Balkans and multiple strikes against Saddam pre-Bush II) but never was the US responsible for the wholesale security of either country.

                              So, same thing with ISIS. Bomb the p !ss out of them until they go away and let local troops deal with them. If they stick their heads up again later on, start bombing again. Its far better than restarting the ludicrous Iraq War complete with boots on the ground doing the fighting for the Iraqis.
                              The lesson for me is you leave the country in shambles OR you take it over. **** nation building and all it entails.
                              **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

                              Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
                              Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

                              Comment


                              • Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

                                Looks like a Frenchman got beheaded. Meanwhile in Marseilles. ...
                                CCT '77 & '78
                                4 kids
                                5 grandsons (BCA 7/09, CJA 5/14, JDL 8/14, JFL 6/16, PJL 7/18)
                                1 granddaughter (EML 4/18)

                                ”Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.”
                                - Benjamin Franklin

                                Banned from the St. Lawrence University Facebook page - March 2016 (But I got better).

                                I want to live forever. So far, so good.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X