The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

[5mn_Major]

Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

Another ringing endorsement of the First Amendment, uttered through clenched teeth.

I think the First is awesome and applies here as much as anywhere.

But that doesn't say anything about his (or his counterparts) multi million pay days which result to the detriment of this country. Or doesn't mean that he should have something on his conscience if the golden rule means anything to him.

Think of it this way. Every nickle the Echo Chamber sucks out of the herpa-derps goes to hookers and blow instead of guns and ammo. We wind up with a few sclerotic old rich guys' hearts exploding instead of innocent bystanders killed by the slack-jawed set.

The country wins.

I understand your broader point. But there is the impressionable middle that falls into the trap and then votes.

[Kepler]

Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

From the Comments on an RT article about the crash:

These observations suggest a heat-seeking missile at a jet engine. Fire was expected to move up the fuel lines inside the wing to set fire to the plane and incinerate all contents, especially the infected corpses and blood packets. This came undone when a bomb put inside the cargo bay by the Israelis, timed to explode at KL to spread biowarfare agents instead heated up and burst midair. The bomb blew out the on-board fire before the cargo was torched. The plane fell to with the biowarfare agents and corpses intact.

An independent technical analysis of the video clips from the crash site, by a retired CIA crash expert:

- the metal fuselage of the Boeing-777 shows no traces of deep and long scratch marks from the steel balls delivered in the warhead of a Buk ground-to-air missile;
- The starboard (right-wing) jet engine was badly damaged and caught fire, pointing to a hit by a smaller air-to-air missile launched from a fighter interceptor, flying at about the same altitude; and
- the midsection was “blown outward and not inward,” indicating a bomb blast inside the cargo bay.

We all now know that Ukrainian Special Forces used this missile system to shoot down a plane they thought was President Putin's plane, in an attempt to assassinate Putin, they obviously failed and killed innocent people. Ukrainian Special Forces are scumbags. President Putin will make them pay dearly.

Because of the war, the U.S. empire and its fascism apprentices, in the ex Ukraine, are with absolute certainty, all satellites, Aligned to this country. So know all States, with satellite, what really happened there.
Without having $ 5 billion Purchased by the U.S. Nato-Nazi coup in Kiev, the tragedy would NEVER possible gewesen.Aber the Empire, Wade since the False Flag 9/11 kilometers deep in the blood of the innocent victims.

No matter how crazy you think humanity is, it never fails to disappoint.

[dxmnkd316]

Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

Holy effing sheet. Thanks for posting that.

More lulz than infowars could ever hope to provide.

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

Here's another take on it: http://consortiumnews.com/2014/07/20...ee-in-ukraine/

[jerphisch]

Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

Here's another take on it: http://consortiumnews.com/2014/07/20...ee-in-ukraine/

The 2nd verse makes me think Weird Al is a college hockey fan.

[Old Pio]

Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

I think the First is awesome and applies here as much as anywhere.

But that doesn't say anything about his (or his counterparts) multi million pay days which result to the detriment of this country. Or doesn't mean that he should have something on his conscience if the golden rule means anything to him.



I understand your broader point. But there is the impressionable middle that falls into the trap and then votes.

In addition to begging the question, I assume you define "detriment" rather broadly as anything or anyone you disagree with.

I further assume your reference to "multi-million pay days" excludes your Hollywood pals.

[Old Pio]

Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

From the Comments on an RT article about the crash:













No matter how crazy you think humanity is, it never fails to disappoint.

That reminds me, I'm due for an Occam's Razor booster shot.

[walrus]

Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

I further assume your reference to "multi-million pay days" excludes your Hollywood pals.

Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert etc, are OK in his book, they make millions the right or is it left way?

[5mn_Major]

Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert etc, are OK in his book, they make millions the right or is it left way?

I am fine when folks make millions off of publicity (see Paris Hilton). I am of the opinion that in the 90s Rush was a major part of change that drove today's incompetent partisan politics and caused media to turn into derogatory entertainment. Its incidental that he happened to make lots of money helping screw up this country. Now Putin's propaganda machine has jumped on the Rush wagon. Anyone may feel free to provide data to the contrary.

[Kepler]

Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert etc, are OK in his book, they make millions the right or is it left way?

Watching Stewart & Colbert for domestic news and Oliver for international gives a viewer a better understanding of actual news than fighting through the garbage on the ostensibly "straight" newscasts. The Feeble Three gum whatever platitudes and cliches their corporate masters have pre-approved, the Partisan Duo are stenographers for their respective parties' publicity departments, and CNN wanders in circles rehashing old E! footage.

[geezer]

Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

Putin's propaganda machine has jumped on the Rush wagon. Anyone may feel free to provide data to the contrary.

Holy smokes. This reminds me of Priceless saying that Hitler was exactly like Jesus, "prove me wrong."
Limbaugh is a harmless lovable little fuzzball, or at worst an annoyingly strident entertainer. He is not teaching lessons on propaganda to the evil dictators of the world. You guys are focusing way to narrowly on one idiot with a radio show for all the ills of the world.
Do I need to repeat any of that?
The "evilscary Koch brothers" may be going out of fashion now as the Terror du Jour, but there's nothing to be gained by transposing all that magical thinking to Rush Limbaugh, Radio Guy.

[5mn_Major]

Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

Holy smokes. This reminds me of Priceless saying that Hitler was exactly like Jesus, "prove me wrong."
Limbaugh is a harmless lovable little fuzzball, or at worst an annoyingly strident entertainer. He is not teaching lessons on propaganda to the evil dictators of the world. You guys are focusing way to narrowly on one idiot with a radio show for all the ills of the world.
Do I need to repeat any of that?
The "evilscary Koch brothers" may be going out of fashion now as the Terror du Jour, but there's nothing to be gained by transposing all that magical thinking to Rush Limbaugh, Radio Guy.

Its not the nature of Rush. He's as much of a hack as Coulter or others on the left. His problem is his legacy. Buckley was an intellectual who argued facts and promoted debate. On the other hand, Rush is a forefather of mindless derogatory partisanship. And if you've looked at current pro Russian media, that is their MO.

[Kepler]

Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

Buckley was an intellectual who argued facts and promoted debate. On the other hand, Rush is a forefather of mindless derogatory partisanship.

You have a valid point, but I don't think Rush has actually diminished the level of important intellectual debate as much as this suggests. Bluntly, smart people have always followed the Buckley style and stupid people have always followed the Rush style. There are far more stupid than smart people, so it appears they are dominating public discourse, but that has never mattered: the smart people have always controlled actual policy.

With the advent of talk radio and the internet we saw the number and viciousness of the stupid people more clearly than before, but nothing has really changed.

[5mn_Major]

Re: The Global War on Terror 5.0: Putin on the Risk

You have a valid point, but I don't think Rush has actually diminished the level of important intellectual debate as much as this suggests. Bluntly, smart people have always followed the Buckley style and stupid people have always followed the Rush style. There are far more stupid than smart people, so it appears they are dominating public discourse, but that has never mattered: the smart people have always controlled actual policy.

With the advent of talk radio and the internet we saw the number and viciousness of the stupid people more clearly than before, but nothing has really changed.

As a I wise man once said 'I understand your broader point. But there is the impressionable middle that falls into the trap and then votes.' And Russia is now included in that statement.

[Priceless]

Holy smokes. This reminds me of Priceless saying that Hitler was exactly like Jesus, "prove me wrong."

Yes, that's exactly what I said...