Alright, I'm ****ed about this one.
In the 2nd intermission of tonight's final the *******s with the NCAA decided to block off a major exit for those in Sections 220-222 for the purpose of recording interviews. This forced a large crowd to exit via the club area.
So, does this constitute a hazard, and if so, whom can I notify.
To be honest, I believe we should have every right to use an exit barring some form of emergency. The fact that ESPN or the NCAA wants a nice TV shot does not count. I do want to get them in trouble for this with some form of authority. The way that arena is structured what they did was create a hazard.
I'm sorry, some TV ambiance is not worth the safety of those attending an event for which we paid $200 for. Frankly, if I was OK with being arrested I would have walked right through that group and their (explitive deleted) interview. That type of *******ry needs to be punished.
I should not be denied a means of egress for the vanity of a television network
In the 2nd intermission of tonight's final the *******s with the NCAA decided to block off a major exit for those in Sections 220-222 for the purpose of recording interviews. This forced a large crowd to exit via the club area.
So, does this constitute a hazard, and if so, whom can I notify.
To be honest, I believe we should have every right to use an exit barring some form of emergency. The fact that ESPN or the NCAA wants a nice TV shot does not count. I do want to get them in trouble for this with some form of authority. The way that arena is structured what they did was create a hazard.
I'm sorry, some TV ambiance is not worth the safety of those attending an event for which we paid $200 for. Frankly, if I was OK with being arrested I would have walked right through that group and their (explitive deleted) interview. That type of *******ry needs to be punished.
I should not be denied a means of egress for the vanity of a television network
Comment