Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vacante

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

    Originally posted by geezer View Post
    Right. Don't the commie socialists have to be red and the patriots, true blue? How would that work if you switched them around? You wouldn't be able to tell who the bad guys are
    Correct, red the people's color.

    Blue is for senescent blue bloods.

    *****http://collectableivy.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/yale-cornell-1941.jpg%3Fw%3D450******
    Cornell University
    National Champion 1967, 1970
    ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
    Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

      Originally posted by Kepler View Post
      Bill's still good at politics.
      He's 100% accurate for the exact reasons given. Saying Romney changes his positions was a good charge during the primaries when you were trying to get a True Believer like Sanitarium the nomination, but now ditch it. It would give Romney precious air cover to say "oh, I don't really believe what I'm saying" (the exact tactic his sister tried this week on abortion rights). What the GOP says, they own.
      Legally drunk???? If its "legal", what's the ------- problem?!? - George Carlin

      Ever notice how everybody who drives slower than you is an idiot, and everybody who drives faster is a maniac? - George Carlin

      "I've never seen so much reason and bullsh*t contained in ONE MAN."

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

        Originally posted by Rover View Post
        What the GOP says, they own.
        When has that EVER happened?
        **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

        Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
        Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

          Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
          When has that EVER happened?
          2008
          Legally drunk???? If its "legal", what's the ------- problem?!? - George Carlin

          Ever notice how everybody who drives slower than you is an idiot, and everybody who drives faster is a maniac? - George Carlin

          "I've never seen so much reason and bullsh*t contained in ONE MAN."

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

            The number of supposed Obama voters in our USCHO poll has me curious. How many of those folks are simply holding their noses and saying, "At least he's not Mitt?"

            FWIW, I'm in the camp of, "No way I'm voting for either of these losers."

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

              Originally posted by FadeToBlack&Gold View Post
              The number of supposed Obama voters in our USCHO poll has me curious. How many of those folks are simply holding their noses and saying, "At least he's not Mitt?"

              FWIW, I'm in the camp of, "No way I'm voting for either of these losers."
              A college aged or relatively younger crowd such as we have here with a few notable exceptions is most likely pro-Obama so that's not a big surprise. While there are certainly some younger voters who don't like Obama, of those I'm not sure Mittens has any appeal. A lot are probably Ron Paul loons.
              Legally drunk???? If its "legal", what's the ------- problem?!? - George Carlin

              Ever notice how everybody who drives slower than you is an idiot, and everybody who drives faster is a maniac? - George Carlin

              "I've never seen so much reason and bullsh*t contained in ONE MAN."

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

                Since 18 year olds were given the right to vote, they have historically underperformed other demographics. '08 was an exception, they flooded to the polls and supported Obama. Polls seem to indicate a lack of enthusiasm among younger voters and black voters as well. With black voters the question is never "what percentage will support the Democrat." It's always 90% and more. Certainly more for the first black nominee. The question is turnout. Again, polling seems to show a diminished level of enthusiasm here, too.

                This election is shaping up to be a "base" election. And His Emptypromisesness is going to have to get younger and black voters charged up or he's a goner.
                2011 Poser of the Year & Pulitzer Prize winning machine gunner.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

                  Originally posted by Old Pio View Post
                  Since 18 year olds were given the right to vote, they have historically underperformed other demographics. '08 was an exception, they flooded to the polls and supported Obama. Polls seem to indicate a lack of enthusiasm among younger voters and black voters as well. With black voters the question is never "what percentage will support the Democrat." It's always 90% and more. Certainly more for the first black nominee. The question is turnout. Again, polling seems to show a diminished level of enthusiasm here, too.

                  This election is shaping up to be a "base" election. And His Emptypromisesness is going to have to get younger and black voters charged up or he's a goner.
                  How about "Old Pio is praying this is a base election circa 1980"? See, there's less of you people (as in old people) this time around as there was in 2008 and you still got your @ sses handed to you. Worse, there was considerable sympathy for McCain given his heroic wartime service that got people to pull the lever for him. No such appeal for Mittens, a guy nobody but his own family likes.

                  See, the lamestream media continues to try to portray this as a 50/50 election when its anything but. Obama does not need the same turnout this year amongst his coalition given the 7 point cushion he won by last time. Furthermore as younger people make up a greater % of the total his task gets even easier. As has been previously reported, in order to win this election Mittens will have to outperform George HW Bush's numbers amongst whities when he ran against the hapless Dukakis. Good luck with that.
                  Legally drunk???? If its "legal", what's the ------- problem?!? - George Carlin

                  Ever notice how everybody who drives slower than you is an idiot, and everybody who drives faster is a maniac? - George Carlin

                  "I've never seen so much reason and bullsh*t contained in ONE MAN."

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

                    Originally posted by Rover View Post
                    How about "Old Pio is praying this is a base election circa 1980"? See, there's less of you people (as in old people) this time around as there was in 2008 and you still got your @ sses handed to you. Worse, there was considerable sympathy for McCain given his heroic wartime service that got people to pull the lever for him. No such appeal for Mittens, a guy nobody but his own family likes.

                    See, the lamestream media continues to try to portray this as a 50/50 election when its anything but. Obama does not need the same turnout this year amongst his coalition given the 7 point cushion he won by last time. Furthermore as younger people make up a greater % of the total his task gets even easier. As has been previously reported, in order to win this election Mittens will have to outperform George HW Bush's numbers amongst whities when he ran against the hapless Dukakis. Good luck with that.
                    Rover

                    What are you going to do if Obama loses?
                    CCT '77 & '78
                    4 kids
                    5 grandsons (BCA 7/09, CJA 5/14, JDL 8/14, JFL 6/16, PJL 7/18)
                    1 granddaughter (EML 4/18)

                    ”Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.”
                    - Benjamin Franklin

                    Banned from the St. Lawrence University Facebook page - March 2016 (But I got better).

                    I want to live forever. So far, so good.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

                      Originally posted by joecct View Post
                      Rover

                      What are you going to do if Obama loses?
                      If?

                      ROTFLMAO. Romney has it in the bag. Have you looked at the economy lately?
                      **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

                      Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
                      Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

                        Originally posted by joecct View Post
                        Rover

                        What are you going to do if Obama loses?
                        Laugh, like Kepler find another topic to troll about. They have you guys hook line and sinker
                        I swear there ain't no heaven but I pray there ain't no hell.

                        Maine Hockey Love it or Leave it

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

                          Originally posted by walrus View Post
                          Laugh, like Kepler find another topic to troll about. They have you guys hook line and sinker
                          Wait, I can't reply with this hook in my mouth.
                          2011 Poser of the Year & Pulitzer Prize winning machine gunner.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

                            Originally posted by Old Pio View Post
                            Wait, I can't reply with this hook in my mouth.
                            I think you swallowed the hook
                            I swear there ain't no heaven but I pray there ain't no hell.

                            Maine Hockey Love it or Leave it

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

                              Originally posted by Old Pio View Post
                              Meanwhile, the libstains shouldn't be overlooked.

                              http://zombietime.com/day_of_fail/
                              My favorite line:

                              But I've always wondered this: How hypocritical is it to wear a plastic toy, designed and licensed by the Warner Brothers corporation, and manufactured in a polluting slave-labor Chinese factory, to advertise a mainstream Hollywood film, starring overpaid actors, the profits from which will go to corporate shareholders, and yet you think that by doing this you're somehow anti-capitalist and anti-authoritarian?

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part II -- Charlotte, a National Treasure or sede vaca

                                Originally posted by joecct View Post
                                Here. Thought is one thread per month.
                                Why not just let one run to 1,000?
                                Code:
                                As of 9/21/10:         As of 9/13/10:
                                College Hockey 6       College Football 0
                                BTHC 4                 WCHA FC:  1
                                Originally posted by SanTropez
                                May your paint thinner run dry and the fleas of a thousand camels infest your dead deer.
                                Originally posted by bigblue_dl
                                I don't even know how to classify magic vagina smoke babies..
                                Originally posted by Kepler
                                When the giraffes start building radio telescopes they can join too.
                                He's probably going to be a superstar but that man has more baggage than North West

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X