Convention junkies can obsess details here!

[Gurtholfin]

Re: Convention junkies can obsess details here!

If you're going to boast about how you have pictures of American vessels, and I'm just going to go out on a limb that you're interested in the details of American warships in general, then I would think you'd know if what was pictured were not American vessels. You're not going to get away with adding an assume clause in order to make your party look good. Otherwise, I'd call you a DNC robot.

My post was critical of this mistake.

I wasn't "boasting" of having pictures. I was saying that it was easy to find those pictures through Google.

Another brilliant post on your part. Keep it up!

[Kepler]

Re: Convention junkies can obsess details here!

My post was critical of this mistake.

I wasn't "boasting" of having pictures. I was saying that it was easy to find those pictures through Google.

Another brilliant post on your part. Keep it up!

Behold the power of trolls.

There is only one solution to this. It's under "Settings."

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: Convention junkies can obsess details here!

My post was critical of this mistake.

I wasn't "boasting" of having pictures. I was saying that it was easy to find those pictures through Google.

Another brilliant post on your part. Keep it up!

Giving someone the benefit of the doubt does not constitute being critical of a mistake. Nice try.

[French Rage]

Re: Convention junkies can obsess details here!

Giving someone the benefit of the doubt does not constitute being critical of a mistake. Nice try.

Where did he give them the benefit of the doubt?

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: Convention junkies can obsess details here!

Where did he give them the benefit of the doubt?

"Assuming of course that this turns out to be true."

[Gurtholfin]

Re: Convention junkies can obsess details here!

Where did he give them the benefit of the doubt?

Who knows?

I thought I was clear in saying that it was a very silly and careless mistake considering how easy it would have been to get it right.

[French Rage]

Re: Convention junkies can obsess details here!

Who knows?

I thought I was clear in saying that it was a very silly and careless mistake considering how easy it would have been to get it right.

I guess he's saying your assume clause is giving them benefit of the doubt. To be fair, the article does mention the DNC apologizing for the incorrect pictures so I think we can know a mistake was made. However, it is still pretty confusing to see how that could somehow change your post into either giving them the benefit of the doubt or making the DNC look good, as your message that it was a dumb mistake and one it would have been easy for them to avoid in the first place is pretty clear.

[Gurtholfin]

Re: Convention junkies can obsess details here!

I guess he's saying your assume clause is giving them benefit of the doubt. To be fair, the article does mention the DNC apologizing for the incorrect pictures so I think we can know a mistake was made. However, it is still pretty confusing to see how that could somehow change your post into either giving them the benefit of the doubt or making the DNC look good, as your message that it was a dumb mistake and one it would have been easy for them to avoid in the first place is pretty clear.

I was posting very early in the cycle of the story, so I was adding a disclaimer to my own points about this specific instance of incompetence. That's all.

Also, while embarrassing, it won't amount to anything although FAUX will undoubtedly try to make it.

[Rover]

Re: Convention junkies can obsess details here!

Behold the power of trolls.

There is only one solution to this. It's under "Settings."

Why would you want to ignore Flag? I'm hoping this is all a gag and he's playing a character out here that's easily caricatured as a laughingstock. If not, the dude needs to seek professional help and quickly.

[unofan]

Re: Convention junkies can obsess details here!

"Assuming of course that this turns out to be true."

That's not giving the DNC the benefit of the doubt, that's refusing to give Foxnews the benefit of the doubt.

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: Convention junkies can obsess details here!

Why would you want to ignore Flag? I'm hoping this is all a gag and he's playing a character out here that's easily caricatured as a laughingstock. If not, the dude needs to seek professional help and quickly.

Do tell us, and I played Willy Wonka in my senior play so I can do the pose, how "the dude needs to seek professional help and quickly."

[Rover]

Re: Convention junkies can obsess details here!

Do tell us, and I played Willy Wonka in my senior play so I can do the pose, how "the dude needs to seek professional help and quickly."

You want to know how you can seek professional help? Well, I'd suggest printing out your incoherent ramblings out here and sending them to your primary care physician. I'm sure they'll have you committed within the hour.

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: Convention junkies can obsess details here!

You want to know how you can seek professional help? Well, I'd suggest printing out your incoherent ramblings out here and sending them to your primary care physician. I'm sure they'll have you committed within the hour.

Well, thank you, Oprah.

[Rover]

Re: Convention junkies can obsess details here!

Well, thank you, Oprah.

I'm way better looking than Oprah although as I only weigh about 195 she might be a little bigger than me.