Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils

    Originally posted by 5mn_Major View Post
    Romney has locked up the W vote. In what the daily caller calls the least enthusiastic endorsement of all time:

    Bush said, verbatim, “I’m for Mitt Romney,” as elevator doors closed on him.
    That endorsement will play well in the Maldives.
    2011 Poser of the Year & Pulitzer Prize winning machine gunner.

    Comment


    • Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils

      Originally posted by Kepler View Post
      Yes. Yes we will.

      These guys aren't capitalists, Fresh, they're just predators. They don't make anything anybody wants. They just gamble with other people's lives. They're scum.
      Awesome.

      Bain's initial investment was $30 million. It cashed out $342 million—more than 1,000 percent of what it originally paid, yet the company still went bankrupt and nearly 1,000 Florida workers lost their jobs.
      **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

      Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
      Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

      Comment


      • Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils

        Originally posted by Rover View Post
        Always amused by when the righties start calling for fairness in political adverstising. Didn't Mittens repeat the Sarah Palin line that ratifying the new SALT treaty (you know, the stuff that Reagan supported all the time) would leave the US unable to defend itself in case of a nuclear attack?

        Bain capital ads will be devastating. They already were when he ran for Senate, and job anxiety is a lot worse now in most of the country than it was in Massachusetts in 1994. Unless you are a fat cat Republican, nobody likes an outsourcer. I am in no way blaming Romney for his actions back then as his job was to make money for his investors. However, good luck to him explaining to people who got laid off that they're better off now that those jobs are sitting in China. Lets hope that exchange comes complete with videotape!
        Yup, simply devastating.
        2011 Poser of the Year & Pulitzer Prize winning machine gunner.

        Comment


        • Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils

          Originally posted by Rover View Post
          Yes, all those minimum wage retail jobs are capitalism at its best. He can put that in his campaign ads as a response! I can see it now, a smiling Mittens surrounded by uniformed Staples workers saying how happy they are to be working for 7 bucks an hour part time with no benefits....
          As opposed to collecting unemployment benefits?
          2011 Poser of the Year & Pulitzer Prize winning machine gunner.

          Comment


          • Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils

            Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
            Awesome.
            The ladies of the chorale are in fine voice today. Who's got the pitchpipe?
            2011 Poser of the Year & Pulitzer Prize winning machine gunner.

            Comment


            • Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils

              Originally posted by Old Pio View Post
              The ladies of the chorale are in fine voice today. Who's got the pitchpipe?
              Just wanted to thank you for reminding me again and again how hopeless everything really is.
              **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

              Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
              Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

              Comment


              • Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils

                Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
                Just wanted to thank you for reminding me again and again how hopeless everything really is.
                I get the same feeling every time you cough up a hairball.
                2011 Poser of the Year & Pulitzer Prize winning machine gunner.

                Comment


                • Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils

                  No wonder Obama is paying attention to JP Morgan,
                  http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/o...213119081.html
                  I swear there ain't no heaven but I pray there ain't no hell.

                  Maine Hockey Love it or Leave it

                  Comment


                  • Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils

                    And in the "best state in the union," the fun continues. It gets worse everyday for Fauxcahontas. Now the Boston Globe, her ardent supporter, has to admit that she's (wait for it) NOT AN INDIAN IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM. And that they relied on phoney or non existant documents when they rushed into print defending her. 'Course this admission came buried on the corrections page, where none but the most sharp eyed types would notice. Oh well, maybe I can find a good recipe for corn pudding in my dog eared copy of "Pow Wow Chow."

                    http://freebeacon.com/warren-not-a-native-american/
                    Last edited by Old Pio; 05-15-2012, 07:38 PM.
                    2011 Poser of the Year & Pulitzer Prize winning machine gunner.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils

                      Originally posted by walrus View Post
                      No wonder Obama is paying attention to JP Morgan,
                      http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/o...213119081.html
                      Considering all his financial people are from JPM, I'm shocked.

                      This is not the Socialist I was looking for.
                      Cornell University
                      National Champion 1967, 1970
                      ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                      Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Rover View Post
                        I wonder when we'll see The Mittster and W campaigning together. I mean, what could possibly be wrong with that?
                        Ask the Mayans.
                        CCT '77 & '78
                        4 kids
                        5 grandsons (BCA 7/09, CJA 5/14, JDL 8/14, JFL 6/16, PJL 7/18)
                        1 granddaughter (EML 4/18)

                        ”Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.”
                        - Benjamin Franklin

                        Banned from the St. Lawrence University Facebook page - March 2016 (But I got better).

                        I want to live forever. So far, so good.

                        Comment


                        • Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils

                          Originally posted by Kepler View Post
                          These guys aren't capitalists, Fresh, they're just predators. They don't make anything anybody wants. They just gamble with other people's lives. They're scum.
                          Funny thing to say, coming from someone who defends evolution by natural selection against creationsim elsewhere...and I thought you knew something about statistics as well!

                          When people support positions I support yet use dopey reasons I challenge them, because I don't want their nonsense to pollute the receptivity others might have for "my" positions if they hear the "dopey" reasons first and close their minds, so that their minds become inaccessible to better reasoning afterward.


                          Pretend for a minute you are running a cancer treatment center. People who already have cancer in the first place are the only ones who come to you. Some of them die. Shall we excoriate you for the heartless way you take people's money to provide treatment, yet the treatment failed? or do we look at the additional longevity you provide these people, even though they did die, do we look at the palliative care you provided, do we look at those people who did respond to treatment and now have cancer in remission? how would you evaluate a cancer treatment center anyway?

                          Private equity isn't much different. Private equity firms select companies that are already in trouble, and try to turn them around. If the company wasn't in trouble to begin with, they wouldn't be in play. Some of these companies fail anyway; yet many of them either remain in business longer than they otherwise would have, or they completely succeed. The ones that remain in business longer than they would have otherwise, generally provide a transition period for the employees to find work elsewhere that they would not have had otherwise.

                          Statistically, then, the "deck is stacked" against the private equity firm....they do not start with any old regular company, they start with troubled companies, and no one is 100% successful all the time. A steel company failed? how shocking....a textile firm failed....really? name one US-based textile firm that survived. It's easy to cherry-pick the extreme outliers and pile on. How about a balanced assessment across the entire portfolio? Sorry, it doesn't fit our political agenda, and so we'll merely take the most egregious failure and pretend that it's representative, while the other side will take the most spectacular success and pretend that it is representative, and we'll merely reinforce our existing beliefs and learn nothing useful whatsoever when it comes to policy prescriptions.





                          It's not only the companies that are "turned around" by private equity that save or create jobs, it also is all the additional incremental jobs in the supply chain and the shipping companies as well. Staples alone created hundreds of thousands of incremental extra jobs, yet we won't hear much about that.


                          So, sorry, your judgment that these people are scum carries about as much weight as it would if you were ranting about all the cancer deaths that occur at a cancer treatment center. You can be morally outraged over superficial, deliberately slanted statistics while knowing little about the overall picture.
                          "Hope is a good thing; maybe the best of things."

                          "Beer is a sign that God loves us and wants us to be happy." -- Benjamin Franklin

                          "Being Irish, he had an abiding sense of tragedy, which sustained him through temporary periods of joy." -- W. B. Yeats

                          "People generally are most impatient with those flaws in others about which they are most ashamed of in themselves." - folk wisdom

                          Comment


                          • Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils

                            Originally posted by FreshFish View Post
                            Private equity isn't much different. Private equity firms select companies that are already in trouble, and try to turn them around. If the company wasn't in trouble to begin with, they wouldn't be in play. Some of these companies fail anyway; yet many of them either remain in business longer than they otherwise would have, or they completely succeed. The ones that remain in business longer than they would have otherwise, generally provide a transition period for the employees to find work elsewhere that they would not have had otherwise.

                            Statistically, then, the "deck is stacked" against the private equity firm....they do not start with any old regular company, they start with troubled companies, and no one is 100% successful all the time. A steel company failed? how shocking....a textile firm failed....really? name one US-based textile firm that survived. It's easy to cherry-pick the extreme outliers and pile on. How about a balanced assessment across the entire portfolio? Sorry, it doesn't fit our political agenda, and so we'll merely take the most egregious failure and pretend that it's representative, while the other side will take the most spectacular success and pretend that it is representative, and we'll merely reinforce our existing beliefs and learn nothing useful whatsoever when it comes to policy prescriptions.





                            It's not only the companies that are "turned around" by private equity that save or create jobs, it also is all the additional incremental jobs in the supply chain and the shipping companies as well. Staples alone created hundreds of thousands of incremental extra jobs, yet we won't hear much about that.


                            So, sorry, your judgment that these people are scum carries about as much weight as it would if you were ranting about all the cancer deaths that occur at a cancer treatment center. You can be morally outraged over superficial, deliberately slanted statistics while knowing little about the overall picture.
                            This is fine in la-la land. The problem which the Obama campaign is going to drive home often is that its not simply a choice between saving a company going under by cutting some jobs to save the rest of them. The issue is do you make 20M dollars by sending the jobs to China vs 10M by keeping the jobs in the US. Mitt Romney as head of Bain capital would choose the 20M, because that maximizes the return to his shareholders. Great, but is he going to campaign in Ohio on that? Best of luck. The bottom line is, there is no good response. The qualities that made Romney a fine CEO of a private equity company would make him a terrible President. Simply put, and this is a point far too many a conservative doesn't understand, but outsourcing US jobs to China does not benefit the US economy.

                            PS - As far as textiles go, Joseph Abboud makes their mens suits and pants out of a factory in New Bedford, MA. Company is doing well and the quality is top notch. Check it out and as always, buy American whenever you get the chance.
                            Last edited by Rover; 05-16-2012, 10:28 AM.
                            Legally drunk???? If its "legal", what's the ------- problem?!? - George Carlin

                            Ever notice how everybody who drives slower than you is an idiot, and everybody who drives faster is a maniac? - George Carlin

                            "I've never seen so much reason and bullsh*t contained in ONE MAN."

                            Comment


                            • Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils

                              Originally posted by Rover View Post
                              PS - As far as textiles go, Joseph Abboud makes their mens suits and pants out of a factory in New Bedford, MA. Company is doing well and the quality is top notch. Check it out and as always, buy American whenever you get the chance.
                              No thanks. He sounds Muslin.
                              Huskies are very intelligent and trainable. Huskies make an excellent jogging companion, as long as it is not too hot. Grooming is minimal; bathing is normally unnecessary.
                              USCHO Fantasy Baseball Champion 2011 2013 2015

                              Comment


                              • Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils

                                Originally posted by FreshFish View Post
                                Funny thing to say, coming from someone who defends evolution by natural selection against creationsim elsewhere...and I thought you knew something about statistics as well!
                                I always thought that was a funny inconsistency with some folks. They swear by natural selection/evolution in one area, saying nothing else could be on the table, but in other places they rail against anything looking remotely like natural selection.
                                Originally posted by Priceless
                                Good to see you're so reasonable.
                                Originally posted by ScoobyDoo
                                Very well, said.
                                Originally posted by Rover
                                A fair assessment Bob.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X