Re: Elections 2012: You must choose the lesser of two weevils
"Rest of the right wing media?" This compulsion for the truth by the MSM evidently doesn't include His Oneness' dietary habits and drug habits and college grades. Nothing to see here, move along. You are exactly correct, as the man once said: "poitics ain't beanbag." The issue to me is the willingness and extent to which the MSM are willing to go to see "their" president re-elected. And if that includes downplaying or ignoring incidents in His Majesty's past then so be it. And if it includes doing the work of the Obama oppo people and enhancing a story with fraudulent quotes, and timing its release for the maximum positive impact to His Oneness, then so be it.
You really didn't mean to compare the WaPo to Fox, did you?
Yeah, SNL used to be pretty even handed in its treatment of politicians. Dana Carvey's Ross Perot was other worldly funny. And Gore's "lockbox" was hilarious. As was Bush's "strategery." Now, however, SNL sh*tcans a sketch mildly critical of His Wonderfulness and replaces it with a sketch making fun of (wait for it) Fox News. How refreshing. How daring. How predictable.
His Cocaineness has no choice. He (and his surrogates) can't talk about his record. So he and they will talk about how much better things will get if he's reelected (with no mention of how worse they got after he got elected). And Seamus and Cranbrook are part of that narrative. Mr. "Let's put partisanship behind us" will run the most negative campaign ever. And if it turns out to be worse than the campaign run against Goldwater, it'll be a doozy.
Originally posted by Priceless
View Post
You really didn't mean to compare the WaPo to Fox, did you?
Yeah, SNL used to be pretty even handed in its treatment of politicians. Dana Carvey's Ross Perot was other worldly funny. And Gore's "lockbox" was hilarious. As was Bush's "strategery." Now, however, SNL sh*tcans a sketch mildly critical of His Wonderfulness and replaces it with a sketch making fun of (wait for it) Fox News. How refreshing. How daring. How predictable.
His Cocaineness has no choice. He (and his surrogates) can't talk about his record. So he and they will talk about how much better things will get if he's reelected (with no mention of how worse they got after he got elected). And Seamus and Cranbrook are part of that narrative. Mr. "Let's put partisanship behind us" will run the most negative campaign ever. And if it turns out to be worse than the campaign run against Goldwater, it'll be a doozy.
Comment