Originally posted by busterman62
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by leswp1 View PostCertainly not jealous of the circumstances that brought you to that but jealous of the being able to just care for people without constraints. It must have been heavenly.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by LynahFan View PostI would absolutely support this. All you have to do is end the tax deduction on health care benefits - helps cut the deficit and allows the market more control of insurance pricing in one fell swoop. What's not to like?Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View PostI've been wanting this for years. I'm sick of employers whining about Health Insurance costs. It's a win-win. I may even get a rebate on my Health Insurance if I have my homeowners and car at the same place.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by busterman62 View PostNatural disasters are probably going to be the only times that will happen.
Just had to post this for you & DrD. (glad you're safe and helping). New record for me today.
45y/o F with an RBS of 2050mg% alert and not acidotic at all. Really....2050. Rechecked 3 times.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View PostJust highlights how screwed up it is to have Health Care attached to employment. It should be illegal for employers to offer it as a benefit. That way all employers would be on the same footing. Then we'd get rid of employee pools and have one big pool of consumer based Health Care. Move it to insurance companies and I can one stop shop for all my insurance needs if I want to.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View PostJust highlights how screwed up it is to have Health Care attached to employment..... Then we'd get rid of employee pools and have one big pool of consumer based Health Care. Move it to insurance companies and I can one stop shop for all my insurance needs if I want to.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by joecct View PostThe upside is that they will have to hire more part time workers to cover the 10 hours (or more) not worked.
It was a badly written law that needs to be repealed and replaced. This time, TAKE YOUR TIME AND GET IT RIGHT (Momma always said Haste Makes Waste)!! Imagine if they tried passing the 1986 Tax Reform like they passed the ACA? Who knows what mess we would have gotten?
The beauty is that no matter who is in charge, it will cost our kids trillions. With the Reps it will be disastrous foreign policy, with the Dems it's domestic.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by leswp1 View PostCertainly not jealous of the circumstances that brought you to that but jealous of the being able to just care for people without constraints. It must have been heavenly.
Just had to post this for you & DrD. (glad you're safe and helping). New record for me today.
45y/o F with an RBS of 2050mg% alert and not acidotic at all. Really....2050. Rechecked 3 times.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by LynahFan View PostI would absolutely support this. All you have to do is end the tax deduction on health care benefits - helps cut the deficit and allows the market more control of insurance pricing in one fell swoop. What's not to like?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View PostJust highlights how screwed up it is to have Health Care attached to employment. It should be illegal for employers to offer it as a benefit. That way all employers would be on the same footing. Then we'd get rid of employee pools and have one big pool of consumer based Health Care. Move it to insurance companies and I can one stop shop for all my insurance needs if I want to.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Just highlights how screwed up it is to have Health Care attached to employment. It should be illegal for employers to offer it as a benefit. That way all employers would be on the same footing. Then we'd get rid of employee pools and have one big pool of consumer based Health Care. Move it to insurance companies and I can one stop shop for all my insurance needs if I want to.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
That's the problem with the left: they don't understand Newton's third law (yet boast about their edu-ma-cation). They don't want to drop expenses because it means more profit for the greedy corporations while they assume rate of revenue will remain the same. They tax those evil corporations while thinking the end product value will remain the same, and the tax won't be thought of as an expense that needs to be factored into the value.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
It was a badly written law that needs to be repealed and replaced. This time, TAKE YOUR TIME AND GET IT RIGHT (Momma always said Haste Makes Waste)!! Imagine if they tried passing the 1986 Tax Reform like they passed the ACA? Who knows what mess we would have gotten?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Hey, here's an idea! Let's pass a really unpopular law with lots of draconian restrictions, and then assume no one will then change their behavior as a result!
oops.....
Some low-wage employers are moving toward hiring part-time workers instead of full-time ones to mitigate the health-care overhaul's requirement that large companies provide health insurance for full-time workers or pay a fee.
Several restaurants, hotels and retailers have started or are preparing to limit schedules of hourly workers to below 30 hours a week. That is the threshold at which large employers in 2014 would have to offer workers a minimum level of insurance or pay a penalty starting at $2,000 for each worker.
The shift is one of the first significant steps by employers to avoid requirements under the health-care law....
Ah, just what we needed in an economy stuck in chronic under-employment!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by DrDemento View PostNo real major trauma cases. Mostly people that were a little sick but more scared than anything else that if they did not get seen things would get worse. Glad i did not have to do any deliveries-my last one was 1969! I think I practiced more psychiatry than anything else but even after 43 years since medical school-it still feels good. The hospital of course accepted whatever medical insurance people had-but the look on patient's faces when they were told we would not charge for any of our medical services was priceless.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: