Originally posted by joecct
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
If this tweet is to believed, more full timers going part time....
Sarah Nelson @sarahsside
Voting for 'revenge' has a price tag: @cr4z3d21 I'm working for Publix grocery, in 2013 they're cutting full timers & hiring part time only
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by unofan View PostSo tell me again why we don't just go single-payer through an entity that inherently does not have a profit motive?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by FreshFish View PostMany self-insured risk pools are run merely to break even, which also makes them more affordable since you don't need to include a margin for profit.
...
Insurance companies are roughly like the house in Vegas: you smooth out any one individual's experience over the experience of a large number of people, pay out most of what you take in, and keep a relatively small amount as profit.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by joecct View PostDid she go to RPI? If so, I think she violated the 'tute Code of Conduct by kissing a Techer.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by joecct View PostLes & Jenny - for you (and any others I forgot)
*****https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/76260_10151150383841236_787146028_n.jpg******
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by joecct View PostTo me, self insure means that the entire risk is on the company, not palmed off to a 3rd party insurance agency.
Insure with a separate insurance company means your risk pool is spread out over the insurance company's risk pool and in the short run the insurance company ponies up for excess claims or pockets excess premium income; however one year's experience (or rolling average of several years) becomes the basis for the subsequent year's premiums.
Insurance companies are roughly like the house in Vegas: you smooth out any one individual's experience over the experience of a large number of people, pay out most of what you take in, and keep a relatively small amount as profit.
In Scooby's model, he cannot forbid employers from offering insurance as that would run afoul of the First Amendment's right to free association; however we can sever the link between employer and employee generally throughout the economy while still allowing self-insured employers to offer coverage to their employees; it would merely be a slight reshuffling of paperwork under the aegis of the state insurance commissioner.Last edited by FreshFish; 11-07-2012, 02:31 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by joecct View Postles & jenny - for you (and any others i forgot)
*****https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/76260_10151150383841236_787146028_n.jpg******
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View PostNot sure I know what self insure means. I'm saying we need to change the law so employers cannot under any circumstances provide Health Care. That way we can truly have a consumer based system. May actually drive some of the costs down.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Les & Jenny - for you (and any others I forgot)
*****https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/76260_10151150383841236_787146028_n.jpg******
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
A new Obamacare requirement has just been implemented. If you run a small business, you now must submit to daily prostate exams, even if you are a woman.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by dxmnkd316 View PostHow would this affect companies that self-insure?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by FlagDUDE08 View PostNever treated someone who each day drank a case of pop, eh?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Originally posted by DrDemento View Post2050??? Holy cow-i would sell at that level and buy it back when you get her back down to the 150 range. In all seriousness in my 44 years in medicine i have not seen that level or even close to it without ketoacidosis.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: