Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ScoobyDoo
    replied
    Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

    Originally posted by joecct View Post
    Is there a problem with this graph??

    *****https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/399400_10150961640840954_1510463149_n.jpg******
    Originally posted by LynahFan View Post
    On a good week, I get to spend about 4 hours (10%) on engineering.

    "We'll give all the engineers MS Office," they said. "They'll be able to keep their own schedules, draft their own memos, create their own presentations, and author their own documents," they said. "We'll save so much money by eliminating secretaries," they said. Well, now they have a a workforce of overpaid secretaries with 4-year engineering degrees shuffling @$%@ paper around all day. Good thinking.
    Trickle Down Economic Theory 101

    Leave a comment:


  • LynahFan
    replied
    Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

    On a good week, I get to spend about 4 hours (10%) on engineering.

    "We'll give all the engineers MS Office," they said. "They'll be able to keep their own schedules, draft their own memos, create their own presentations, and author their own documents," they said. "We'll save so much money by eliminating secretaries," they said. Well, now they have a a workforce of overpaid secretaries with 4-year engineering degrees shuffling @$%@ paper around all day. Good thinking.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tiggsy
    replied
    Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

    Originally posted by Kepler View Post
    I'll bet there are similar graphs for, say, the number of scientists at science companies, or engineers at engineering firms, or programmers at software companies.

    Which is not to say there isn't a problem, but I think it's a reflection of a larger economic phenomenon than health care.

    (And speaking as a non-engineer at an engineering company... what problem?! )
    As an engineer for a medical device company, I see the exact opposite. We are having to do our own admin work which leaves less time for actual engineering that costs both us and our customers and the consumers money. So this is a big problem.

    *yes I'm typing this while at work putting off doing some of my admin stuff. No engineering for me today.

    Leave a comment:


  • ScoobyDoo
    replied
    Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

    Originally posted by joecct View Post
    Is there a problem with this graph??
    The graph is US Economy under trickle down 101.


    Originally posted by dxmnkd316 View Post
    Just got our information for our 2013 health insurance plans.

    Premiums: Up 8%
    Deductibles: Up 14%
    Annual OOP Max: Up 5%

    Coverage Changes:
    The following women's heath services are covered at 100% due to HCRA: Annual well-woman visit, FDA-approved prescription contraceptives, breastfeeding supplies and sounseling, etc.

    The increase in medical costs is low considering the add-ons. Many years we saw 20% increases with decreases in benefits.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kepler
    replied
    Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

    Originally posted by joecct View Post
    Is there a problem with this graph??
    I'll bet there are similar graphs for, say, the number of scientists at science companies, or engineers at engineering firms, or programmers at software companies.

    Which is not to say there isn't a problem, but I think it's a reflection of a larger economic phenomenon than health care.

    (And speaking as a non-engineer at an engineering company... what problem?! )
    Last edited by Kepler; 10-09-2012, 02:21 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • dxmnkd316
    replied
    Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

    Just got our information for our 2013 health insurance plans.

    Premiums: Up 8%
    Deductibles: Up 14%
    Annual OOP Max: Up 5%

    Coverage Changes:
    The following women's heath services are covered at 100% due to HCRA: Annual well-woman visit, FDA-approved prescription contraceptives, breastfeeding supplies and sounseling, etc.
    Last edited by dxmnkd316; 10-09-2012, 02:17 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • joecct
    replied
    Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

    Is there a problem with this graph??

    *****https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/399400_10150961640840954_1510463149_n.jpg******

    Leave a comment:


  • unofan
    replied
    Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

    Originally posted by FlagDUDE08 View Post
    If a few groups wish to be philanthropists and provide that at their cost, that's their prerogative. To force unwilling groups to do that is just plain wrong, and is the entire crux of the argument.
    Let me know when I can stop paying for things like farm and oil subsidies, the TSA, and the department of homeland security, and then we'll talk.
    Last edited by unofan; 10-06-2012, 06:07 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • joecct
    replied
    Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

    Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
    Nope. Pro Life groups are anti-sex.
    No. We like sex. We just think that abortion should not be used as a method of birth control. There is a sub-set that thinks birth control is misguided, too. But that's a small circle inside of a big circle.

    However, I think we could reach agreement that sex without love is pleasure, not joy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kepler
    replied
    Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

    Originally posted by LynahFan View Post
    This. Conscientious objectors are released from serving in the military - they are not exempt from paying taxes that fund the military.
    One of the (very) few tenets of libertarianism I still agree with holds that the state's first priority is to protect its monopoly of force, and it does this by using all its other forces -- social, economic, technological, religious, and political -- to ruthlessly maintain it.

    (Where libertarians are wrong is that they think this is specific to the state, whereas in reality it is simply a property of power.)
    Last edited by Kepler; 10-05-2012, 12:10 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • LynahFan
    replied
    Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

    Originally posted by sagard View Post
    Why should they be exempt from paying for things they hate? I hate us spending money on wars and ridiculous "homeland security." I pay plenty of taxes.
    This. Conscientious objectors are released from serving in the military - they are not exempt from paying taxes that fund the military.

    Leave a comment:


  • sagard
    replied
    Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

    Originally posted by FlagDUDE08 View Post
    If a few groups wish to be philanthropists and provide that at their cost, that's their prerogative. To force unwilling groups to do that is just plain wrong, and is the entire crux of the argument.
    Why should they be exempt from paying for things they hate? I hate us spending money on wars and ridiculous "homeland security." I pay plenty of taxes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kepler
    replied
    Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

    Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
    Nope. Pro Life groups are anti-sex.
    Not all sex.

    Leave a comment:


  • ScoobyDoo
    replied
    Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

    Originally posted by FlagDUDE08 View Post
    If a few groups wish to be philanthropists and provide that at their cost, that's their prerogative. To force unwilling groups to do that is just plain wrong, and is the entire crux of the argument.
    No question about it. People are being forced to use birth control.

    Leave a comment:


  • FlagDUDE08
    replied
    Re: The Sad Case of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

    Originally posted by unofan View Post
    http://vitals.nbcnews.com/_news/2012...ly-study-finds

    Look at that, subsidized birth control cuts down on abortions. That should be a win-win for everyone, right? Right?
    ...(crickets chirping)...
    If a few groups wish to be philanthropists and provide that at their cost, that's their prerogative. To force unwilling groups to do that is just plain wrong, and is the entire crux of the argument.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X