Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wisconsin Women's Hockey 2024-2025

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by wheel snipe celly View Post

    Kotlowski is not coming back
    Even with Bickett, aren't we still 1 D short? I think we only have 6 (KK, Jungels, Murphy, Potter, Venusio, Bickett) and I would think you want to carry 7.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Bonzo View Post

      Even with Bickett, aren't we still 1 D short? I think we only have 6 (KK, Jungels, Murphy, Potter, Venusio, Bickett) and I would think you want to carry 7.
      Yes I have 6 as well.
      Wisconsin Hockey: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 WE WANT MORE!
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Come to the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Originally Posted by Wisko McBadgerton:
      "Baggot says Hughes and Rockwood are centering the top two lines...
      Timothy A --> Great hockey mind... Or Greatest hockey mind?!?"

      Comment


      • #48
        Is Wilgren definitely not coming back?

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Timothy A View Post

          Yes I have 6 as well.
          Yes, we're still at 6, but already that's better than 5. A one and done D for depth would likely be a good addition in terms of the 24-25 season. But I really like what this gives us when you look at the long-term plan.
          Juniors - Caroline Harvey, Vivian Jungels
          Sophomores - Laney Potter, Ava Murphy
          Freshman - Emma Venusio, Grace Bickett
          2025-2026 (committed) - Mackenzie Jones, Rachel Gorbatenko

          That is a nice wave of talented defensewomen at a nice pace

          Comment


          • #50
            Do we have three goalies for next year?

            Comment


            • #51
              An April of senior year commitment for a tiny, uncommitted D that will need to play in the top 6? Woof. Fortunately, your forwards will have the puck for most of every game they play, and Harvey and Jungels can eat big minutes. Their timing obviously reflects that they were interested in Disher and Swiderski and lost.

              Comment


              • #52
                Who says Disher is no longer in play?

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Ooftah View Post
                  Who says Disher is no longer in play?
                  Ian Kennedy on X posted that Brooke Disher was "likely" to become a Buckeye.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Harvey to Simms! Love it, Go Badgers on team USA!

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Once again, Nadine has opened her vacuum cleaner full blast into the portal. Is anyone paying attention? Is anyone looking into NIL-related mischief?

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by PuckLover View Post
                        An April of senior year commitment for a tiny, uncommitted D that will need to play in the top 6? Woof.
                        MJ basically rolls 4 D anyway in the big games and Venusio easily is a top 5 d, so they can run 5 a rotation no problem and win.
                        Wisconsin Hockey: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 WE WANT MORE!
                        ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        Come to the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod
                        ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        Originally Posted by Wisko McBadgerton:
                        "Baggot says Hughes and Rockwood are centering the top two lines...
                        Timothy A --> Great hockey mind... Or Greatest hockey mind?!?"

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Ooftah View Post
                          Do we have three goalies for next year?
                          Not yet.
                          Wisconsin Hockey: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 WE WANT MORE!
                          ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Come to the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod
                          ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Originally Posted by Wisko McBadgerton:
                          "Baggot says Hughes and Rockwood are centering the top two lines...
                          Timothy A --> Great hockey mind... Or Greatest hockey mind?!?"

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Timothy A View Post

                            MJ basically rolls 4 D anyway in the big games and Venusio easily is a top 5 d, so they can run 5 a rotation no problem and win.
                            Don't disagree, but Helgeson, Kotlowski, KK, and Murphy all missed time this year due to injury. Rolling with only 6 is really cutting it thin if you lose a player or two for any time

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Ooftah View Post
                              Once again, Nadine has opened her vacuum cleaner full blast into the portal. Is anyone paying attention? Is anyone looking into NIL-related mischief?
                              Meh, I don't know why it wouldn't be expected. Only two schools have won a title since 2018. We aren't going to go portal hunting, and quite frankly there was nobody in the portal this year I would have penciled in as a Top 6 (maybe Top 9 depending on if you're as high on McCarthy and Scannell as I am) Forward or Top 4 D for us. Reality is if you're in the portal and you want minutes you ain't getting them in Madison.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by Bonzo View Post

                                Don't disagree, but Helgeson, Kotlowski, KK, and Murphy all missed time this year due to injury. Rolling with only 6 is really cutting it thin if you lose a player or two for any time
                                Yeah I completely agree. MJ's just been really tight on having extra personnel the last few years. I don't know if that's by design or he didn't get who he wanted so he got nobody. Six is doable but not ideal.
                                Wisconsin Hockey: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 WE WANT MORE!
                                ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                Come to the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod
                                ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                Originally Posted by Wisko McBadgerton:
                                "Baggot says Hughes and Rockwood are centering the top two lines...
                                Timothy A --> Great hockey mind... Or Greatest hockey mind?!?"

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X