Originally posted by Timothy A
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Michigan Getting a Women's Team?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Hockeybuckeye View Post
I'm pretty certain the rules don't allow a conference to form using an affiliate member as an affiliate could eventually leave leaving the conference with 5 members which would be against the rules. I can only imagine the nightmare if they had to dissolve a conference after witnessing it before in men's hockey.
As a PSU fan you should know Notre Dame wasn't enough for the Big Ten men's to form but it was when Penn State started hockey giving the Big Ten a legitimate 6 Big Ten teams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PSUfan View Post
"Enough teams" is six. There are currently four Big Ten schools with women's hockey (Minnesota, Wisconsin, Ohio State & Penn State.) They need two more teams to make up a Big Ten conference for women's hockey
Yost at Michigan is extremely cramped and to be realistic they would have to extend Yost into the south parking lot to house the women. It's so iconic to them I can't imagine them building a new arena.
Comment
-
Originally posted by robertearle View Post
B1G men's Lacrosse has only six teams right now, including Johns Hopkins.
Comment
-
Came across this this morning.
https://www.woodtv.com/news/michigan/michigan-takes-step-to-become-1st-major-school-in-state-to-launch-a-womens-varsity-hockey-program/
Looks like there's some traction. While I'm all for this, I fear what it will eventually mean for the WCHA.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Windchill22 View Post
Looks like there's some traction. While I'm all for this, I fear what it will eventually mean for the WCHA.
I have no doubt Michigan will get their varsity program as I know firsthand president Ono is for it and with the Illich family on board it will happen and they may help fund a women's arena.
But the story is wrong on one point, as I've stated before Yost can have an addition build on its southern side into the existing parking lot and made to match Yost's exterior and accommodate the women that way.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Timothy A View PostPerfect, thanks. I for one do NOT want to see the WCHA broken up in any way, shape or form, I am a traditionalist. If MI starts one, they can join CHA.
Originally posted by Hockeybuckeye View PostYes, there is an eventual risk to the WCHA which I think is inevitable but not in the very near future. If Illinois gets back on track with their efforts to start hockey which stalled with COVID that along with Michigan would give the Big Ten the required six teams.RowTheBoatSkiUMahGoGophers!
Comment
-
I am team Break Up The WCHA. No idea why I feel this way it's a total mystery!Grant Salzano, Boston College '10
Writer Emeritus, BC Interruption
Twitter: @Salzano14
Click here for the BC Interruption Pairwise, KRACH, and GRaNT Calculators
Comment
-
Originally posted by robertearle View PostI wonder if the Mankatos and Bemidjis of the world are as 'fond' of the WCHA. Maybe they'd like a WCHA that isn't dominated by the same few teams every year. I guess the problem might be Duluth; would they dominate, or would the others catch up to them?
- 1 like
Comment
-
I think this is a long way off at this point. While many of the higher ups are behind starting a womens team in principle, the Title IX implications are substantial. If Michigan adds a womens hockey team of say 30 players, they have to either add something on the mens side or eliminate something on the mens or womens side. Assuming that Michigan is currently in Title IX compliance, which I have to assume they are, adding a team brings with it more complications than just the rink situation.
Comment
Comment