Outrage doesn’t provide any solutions. You can argue that Harvard chose self-interest over doing the right thing, but it’s not really so clear what doing the right thing would have been in this situation, other than not moving at glacial speed to part ways with Stone. One may have wanted something more punitive, but loss of position and reputation on this scale is not negligible — she’s been disgraced. Though Harvard’s first concern may not have been for HWH, its wider interest in putting institutional damage behind it in fact enables the women’s program to move ahead without the further, overwhelming disruptions that any litigation would bring. And it’s not clear that anyone involved has any taste for litigation, though this may play out differently down the road. (Indeed, there may already be settlements that we will never hear about.) And how much more light can be shed on this already well-documented situation? What more can be said? That's why the tabloid stuff is questionable. Do we really need to hear more than once what the sorry behaviors were? There’s a semi-creepy quality in the need to repeat these accounts. It was very nasty stuff. We know!
Meanwhile I’m waiting for the white smoke to appear over the Vatican. McDermott must have been telling the truth when she confessed to an inexcusably late start in the search process. Harvard can now combine self-interest with doing the right thing and remove her also.
Meanwhile I’m waiting for the white smoke to appear over the Vatican. McDermott must have been telling the truth when she confessed to an inexcusably late start in the search process. Harvard can now combine self-interest with doing the right thing and remove her also.
Comment