What an ugly weekend. After today, Bucky has lost three in a row and managed only 1 goal over 9 periods!!!! And there is a strong possibility that the strings may be extended next weekend. And the final two weekends of the regular season against MN and OhSt are only 3 weeks away. The way things are looking now, the Badgers may well suffer SIX more losses before the regular season ends and a 7th in the WCHA tournament that follows in which they will play either MN or OhSt again. Not a recipe for a bid to the NCAA championship.
Suddenly, something is seriously wrong. It began last weekend against Quinnipiac and got worse this weekend. Assuming the coaches attempted to make adjustments between the two weekends as well as during the games, they still haven’t found any fixes. Somehow, they apparently decided switching the line assignments of Eden and SS would improve things. I was surprised by this when Eden was announced as starting on Line1 Saturday since I thought the first 2 lines were fine as they were. Personally, I have felt for a while that moving Picard to Line 3 with Simms and Woz and LE to Line 4 would make sense since Picard is similar to Simms and Woz in speed and aggressiveness, while LE has less speed and tends to be more passive. So, I think it would be nice if someone would explain the choice to shuffle the first 2 lines.
As for LE, many in this forum (including myself) have expressed interest in her establishing a presence around the net as a routine role (something which, in fact, started shortly after her recruitment was announced). The fact that she hasn’t adopted such a position suggests that the coaches have not as yet emphasized that she do this. She is a very tall and strong F for women’s hockey, and she likely would provide a distracting presence for goalies. But, like many of the taller girls in my sons’ classes, she may have experienced most of her growth before or shortly after starting high school. If so, she may not have had a need to be very aggressive to have her way on the ice and the level of aggressiveness at this level is unfamiliar to her. I also have noted that she has been less rambunctious when she scores goals. So, she simply may have a less aggressive personality and still is trying to adapt to the more intense level of play at this level. Frankly, if this is the case, I admire her for struggling and for refusing suddenly to adopt a totally new persona. Perhaps a line switch would help her decide how to adapt to the new environment and remain true to her personality. Everything I have heard about her indicates she is a wonderful young woman, and it is for her to define who she is on and off the ice. However, I can’t help wishing that she finds ways to occupy more space around the goal that she finds comfortable.
On a more positive note, nice to see Gervais return to action. Never know when one may need to call on a backup goalie.
Suddenly, something is seriously wrong. It began last weekend against Quinnipiac and got worse this weekend. Assuming the coaches attempted to make adjustments between the two weekends as well as during the games, they still haven’t found any fixes. Somehow, they apparently decided switching the line assignments of Eden and SS would improve things. I was surprised by this when Eden was announced as starting on Line1 Saturday since I thought the first 2 lines were fine as they were. Personally, I have felt for a while that moving Picard to Line 3 with Simms and Woz and LE to Line 4 would make sense since Picard is similar to Simms and Woz in speed and aggressiveness, while LE has less speed and tends to be more passive. So, I think it would be nice if someone would explain the choice to shuffle the first 2 lines.
As for LE, many in this forum (including myself) have expressed interest in her establishing a presence around the net as a routine role (something which, in fact, started shortly after her recruitment was announced). The fact that she hasn’t adopted such a position suggests that the coaches have not as yet emphasized that she do this. She is a very tall and strong F for women’s hockey, and she likely would provide a distracting presence for goalies. But, like many of the taller girls in my sons’ classes, she may have experienced most of her growth before or shortly after starting high school. If so, she may not have had a need to be very aggressive to have her way on the ice and the level of aggressiveness at this level is unfamiliar to her. I also have noted that she has been less rambunctious when she scores goals. So, she simply may have a less aggressive personality and still is trying to adapt to the more intense level of play at this level. Frankly, if this is the case, I admire her for struggling and for refusing suddenly to adopt a totally new persona. Perhaps a line switch would help her decide how to adapt to the new environment and remain true to her personality. Everything I have heard about her indicates she is a wonderful young woman, and it is for her to define who she is on and off the ice. However, I can’t help wishing that she finds ways to occupy more space around the goal that she finds comfortable.
On a more positive note, nice to see Gervais return to action. Never know when one may need to call on a backup goalie.
Comment