Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Possible Tournament Expansion
Collapse
X
-
Possible Tournament Expansion
Grant Salzano, Boston College '10
Writer Emeritus, BC Interruption
Twitter: @Salzano14
Click here for the BC Interruption Pairwise, KRACH, and GRaNT CalculatorsTags: None
-
Originally posted by TonyTheTiger20 View Post
If the idea is again to "save flights/travel" etc. it doesn't do that.
All 10 teams going to the single site means nine or ten teams travelling.
Two play-in games followed by the regular eight team format means nine or ten teams travelling: two or the four involved in play-in travel to games hosted by play-in teams; then four quarterfinal teams travel to four hosting quarterfinal teams; then three or four teams travel to the FF site. Nine or ten teams having to travel somewhere. Nothing "saved"
Obviously, what is lost is sellout crowds and really energized buildings for the teams hosting play-in and quarterfinal games.
-
I didn’t understand the single site cost savings, and actually thought of Wisconsin who doesn’t get to host Final Four Faceoff, now losing its annual NCAA hosting game.
but overall love the idea of expanding to 10 teams. When it was reported previously that CHA / NEWHA we’re going to share an auto bid or something that was a hard no for me. Kudos to the coaches for bringing this forward.
Comment
-
Leave it alone. At least right now 4 schools get to have 1 home game, meaning their fans will get to see the games in person.
The 9 and 10 teams are not going to beat the 1-2 teams once out of 10 games, so what if the point, give some more players a metal or a participation trophy? If there was more parody like on the men's side, it would make sense. The men's side should expand because lower seeds are always making noise. Has there ever been a Holy Cross type upset win on the women's side?Wisconsin Hockey: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 WE WANT MORE!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come to the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by Wisko McBadgerton:
"Baggot says Hughes and Rockwood are centering the top two lines...
Timothy A --> Great hockey mind... Or Greatest hockey mind?!?"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Timothy A View PostThe 9 and 10 teams are not going to beat the 1-2 teams once out of 10 games
If there was more parody
Grant Salzano, Boston College '10
Writer Emeritus, BC Interruption
Twitter: @Salzano14
Click here for the BC Interruption Pairwise, KRACH, and GRaNT Calculators
Comment
-
Originally posted by Timothy A View PostLeave it alone. At least right now 4 schools get to have 1 home game, meaning their fans will get to see the games in person.
The 9 and 10 teams are not going to beat the 1-2 teams once out of 10 games
Comment
-
Originally posted by robertearle View Post
"HARD NO" to single site tournament!
1. Bracket Integrity The "WCHA vs. WCHA Play-In Game" has been an almost annual event. And it usually destroys bracket integrity. Getting rid of that albatross is no small thing. With a single site, "No Intra-Conference Match-Ups In The First Round" can become the new normal.
2. Attending More Of The Tournament Under the current format, it's essentially impossible to attend more than 1 Quarterfinal. With a single site, you could attend all 7 (or 9) NCAA games for the price of a single trip. Or whatever portion of the tournament that fits into your schedule. If you're a true fan of the sport, that is a very cool option. For those who are a fan of only 1 team, period? It get that the likely reaction will be a yawn.
Personally I attended 2 sessions in Erie: The OSU/BC Quarterfinal and the UW/Northeastern Title Game. Work obligations precluded the OSU/UW Semifinal, though I did watch that game on TV. Due to Covid concerns, I opted out of overnight lodging. Granted, Columbus to Erie is a long commute. But it was well worth it for both games.
During the course of those drives, it certainly occurred to me that staying through would have been very appealing in more normal times. Though the particulars would have been different, I imagine that those staging the event had similar thoughts.
If the idea is again to "save flights/travel" etc. it doesn't do that.
All 10 teams going to the single site means nine or ten teams travelling.
Two play-in games followed by the regular eight team format means nine or ten teams travelling: two or the four involved in play-in travel to games hosted by play-in teams; then four quarterfinal teams travel to four hosting quarterfinal teams; then three or four teams travel to the FF site. Nine or ten teams having to travel somewhere. Nothing "saved"
I would be interested to know what costs were saved by staging the tournament at a single site, as opposed to five (or seven) sites. My suspicion is that some dollars were saved, but probably not a game-changing amount of money. But my further suspicion is that for NCAA personnel running the tournament, the single site made things much easier.
Obviously, what is lost is sellout crowds and really energized buildings for the teams hosting play-in and quarterfinal games.Last edited by pgb-ohio; 05-29-2021, 06:38 AM.
Comment
-
This year it is at Pegula, State college is very well equipped to handle a single site format. They are used to hosting home football games and there are plenty of accommodations with in 1 mile of the arena . The nice thing about a one site tournament is it could grow in stature and become a real draw. I.E. the MSHSL boys ang irls high school hockey tournament.
The other nice thing is that larger nicer Venues could house the tournament. Pegula is an example of such a Venue. Excel would be another one. Englestead, Rochester etc..
I think it is a great idea. Especially with Wisconsin being in the tournament can you imagine the 10 day party when a town is taken over by the red horde....LOL
Comment
-
Originally posted by zambonidriver View PostEspecially with Wisconsin being in the tournament can you imagine the 10 day party when a town is taken over by the red horde....LOL
Comment
-
Originally posted by zambonidriver View PostThis year it is at Pegula, State college is very well equipped to handle a single site format. They are used to hosting home football games and there are plenty of accommodations with in 1 mile of the arena.
The nice thing about a one site tournament is it could grow in stature and become a real draw. I.E. the MSHSL Boys ang Girls high school hockey tournament.
The other nice thing is that larger nicer Venues could house the tournament. Pegula is an example of such a Venue. Excel would be another one. Englestead, Rochester etc..
NHL Arenas like The X simply have too much seating capacity. In the Twin Cities, Ridder and/or Mariucci are better options.
For Rochester, I presume you're referencing the Amerks' Downtown Arena. (Blue Cross Arena?) I'd honestly rather see the tournament hosted on campus at RIT, at Polisseni. Yes, I've been to the Men's Hockey Brick City Classic Downtown. Yes, it's a great event. That arena could actually work for a Women's FF. But Polisseni is also a very nice arena, and a better fit for our expected crowd, IMHO.
I think it is a great idea. Especially with Wisconsin being in the tournament can you imagine the 10 day party when a town is taken over by the red horde....LOL
But it's OK. We have to leave something for the next generation to accomplish.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TitleIXHockey View PostThey're not supposed to, that's why they're the 9th and 10th seeds (or 7th and 8th seeds) and not the 1st or 2nd seeds.Wisconsin Hockey: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 WE WANT MORE!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come to the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by Wisko McBadgerton:
"Baggot says Hughes and Rockwood are centering the top two lines...
Timothy A --> Great hockey mind... Or Greatest hockey mind?!?"
Comment
Comment