Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Minnesota Gopher Women's Hockey 20-21

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FiveHoleFrenzy
    replied
    Originally posted by D2D View Post

    If the Gophers can match the effort they put forth this past weekend, they should be OK. I am 50% confident of this...
    That is a big if...

    10%

    Leave a comment:


  • D2D
    replied
    Originally posted by FiveHoleFrenzy View Post

    I'm confident we will see OSU's best effert...Less confident that will be the case with Minnesota.
    If the Gophers can match the effort they put forth this past weekend, they should be OK. I am 50% confident of this...

    Leave a comment:


  • FiveHoleFrenzy
    replied
    Originally posted by Hockeybuckeye View Post
    With the regular season coming down to the wire this weekends series with you guys hosting Ohio State should contain a lot of serious effort on the part of both teams!
    I'm confident we will see OSU's best effert...Less confident that will be the case with Minnesota.

    Leave a comment:


  • FiveHoleFrenzy
    replied
    Originally posted by robertearle View Post
    (The guy from the Wi State Journal tried a backdoor version of 'which seniors are coming back to play next year?' but Johnson didn't bite on it.)
    Sure will be interesting to see how that plays out across all of women's college hockey next year.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hockeybuckeye
    replied
    With the regular season coming down to the wire this weekends series with you guys hosting Ohio State should contain a lot of serious effort on the part of both teams!

    Leave a comment:


  • robertearle
    replied
    Originally posted by robertearle View Post

    I'll be interested to see/hear what the refs told Mark Johnson, if he mentions it in the newspaper tomorrow, or in 'press conference' on Monday, etc.
    Nothing in the Sunday newspaper article. And MJ was not asked about it today.

    (The guy from the Wi State Journal tried a backdoor version of 'which seniors are coming back to play next year?' but Johnson didn't bite on it.)

    Leave a comment:


  • D2D
    replied
    Originally posted by Offsides Guy View Post
    I have no dog in the fight but is there a budding goalie controversy at MN?
    I don't believe it would be accurate to call it a "budding goalie controversy" but Coach Frost has given the start in the second game of the last two series to Makayla Paul. She also played the 3rd period in the Wisconsin game on January 15. Both Paul and Bench have very solid stats when it comes to SV% at .936 and .927 respectively. I wouldn't be at all surprised if the two continue to alternate in goal the rest of the way.

    Leave a comment:


  • Offsides Guy
    replied
    Originally posted by robertearle View Post

    He hasn't noticed yet that it isn't Bench in goal today...
    I have no dog in the fight but is there a budding goalie controversy at MN?

    Leave a comment:


  • FiveHoleFrenzy
    replied
    Originally posted by robertearle View Post
    I'll be interested to see/hear what the refs told Mark Johnson, if he mentions it in the newspaper tomorrow, or in 'press conference' on Monday, etc.
    Hopefully he doesn't muzzinator the thing...Wisconsin has really had a very good 4 games against Minnesota this year. 9 of 12 points is pretty darn good

    Leave a comment:


  • robertearle
    replied
    Originally posted by FiveHoleFrenzy View Post

    I think you're right. Maybe they decided since it went off the Sinner player and it was called a good goal on the ice they wouldn't overturn it? I don't know.

    Going by D2D example I will stick to the positive. #22, #7, and #33 were players that I thought played very well for Minnesota. Big goal by Boreen and nice job by Shearen filling in for Skaja. Pahl was very good between the pipes today.
    I'll be interested to see/hear what the refs told Mark Johnson, if he mentions it in the newspaper tomorrow, or in 'press conference' on Monday, etc.

    I only really thought about or noticed today, but if UMD wins their next four games - all against Mankato - and then takes (I think) five or six points from UW the last weekend, they will win the conference championship. And the two points UW didn't get today go a long way to making that possible.
    Last edited by robertearle; 02-06-2021, 07:59 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • FiveHoleFrenzy
    replied
    Originally posted by robertearle View Post
    Zumwinkle in the blue ice before the puck, makes contact with Blair and prevents Blair from moving to the puck. No way is that a good goal.
    I think you're right. Maybe they decided since it went off the Sinner player and it was called a good goal on the ice they wouldn't overturn it? I don't know.

    Going by D2D example I will stick to the positive. #22, #7, and #33 were players that I thought played very well for Minnesota. Big goal by Boreen and nice job by Shearen filling in for Skaja. Pahl was very good between the pipes today.

    Leave a comment:


  • D2D
    replied
    Originally posted by D2D View Post
    Still tied after the 3 on 3, now going to a shootout.
    Taylor Wente was the only player to score in the shootout, Gophers get the win and the extra point.

    Leave a comment:


  • D2D
    replied
    Originally posted by D2D View Post
    They are playing much better than usual against their old nemesis. Going to overtime...3 on 3.
    Still tied after the 3 on 3, now going to a shootout.

    Leave a comment:


  • D2D
    replied
    Originally posted by FiveHoleFrenzy View Post

    You are so much more positive than me...LOL
    They are playing much better than usual against their old nemesis. Going to overtime...3 on 3.

    Leave a comment:


  • robertearle
    replied
    Zumwinkle in the blue ice before the puck, makes contact with Blair and prevents Blair from moving to the puck. No way is that a good goal.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X