If I’m the UU AD, I’m thinking carefully about what a worse record does to my nice attendance figures. I’m thinking about all the added costs of other sports going D-II compared to whatever benefit I get from hockey being D-I.
As an outsider I’m curious if whatever calls that got reported with AHA were ever truly serious to begin with. Maybe some D-III ADs just go out there and do due diligence on reclassification just to know what their options are, even if they know it’s too much to actually go through with. Maybe AHA are just doing due diligence as a bargaining chip so RMU and LIU (or Navy or NE-10 schools for all we know) don’t go around thinking that anything is a given, or sort of like how some companies get a quote from a second vendor just to be sure.
Or maybe it’s all serious and they have some plan to make it all work (reclassification, donors, begging for an exception, et al). So many of us don’t know what we don’t know about what’s behind the curtain.
As an outsider I’m curious if whatever calls that got reported with AHA were ever truly serious to begin with. Maybe some D-III ADs just go out there and do due diligence on reclassification just to know what their options are, even if they know it’s too much to actually go through with. Maybe AHA are just doing due diligence as a bargaining chip so RMU and LIU (or Navy or NE-10 schools for all we know) don’t go around thinking that anything is a given, or sort of like how some companies get a quote from a second vendor just to be sure.
Or maybe it’s all serious and they have some plan to make it all work (reclassification, donors, begging for an exception, et al). So many of us don’t know what we don’t know about what’s behind the curtain.
Comment