The National Anthem at "UU" games just won't be the same....
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Utica College: The gang's all here.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Fishman'81 View PostIgnoring the little green trolls, it was good to see Dickson back in net tonight. (Not that Landsberger wasn't stellar in relief with his .963 Save %).
The drag is in the bag, in terms of home-ice throughout the silly tournament, but the ridiculous AQ isn't guaranteed... There's these guys from PA that nobody is talking about.
Wilkes is a very dangerous team. Better than Adrian, from what I've seen first-hand, and ditto via Genny.
Of course, five games in the aggregate is a limited sample-size, but watch out for Wilkes if they garner a berth. I am absolutely convinced that they could beat anyone on a given night.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JSicedog View Post
Good weekend for the perennial national contenders. Looking forward to playoffs.
But why does Utica have to play again on Tuesday? UC won the whole thing over a 25 game schedule, and Leb Valley is still in a position to take it away via a single game?
This entire AQ thing is completely idiotic.Last edited by Fishman'81; 02-20-2022, 10:41 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by altazo View Post
What a second, I get it, Fish is being facetious! He’s been following the University of Maine ever since THEY were D2. And they had that hot streak back in the 1900’s under Walsh when they won the whole thing once or twice.
Nicely played!
And again, why are you here? Go s*** in your own yard, numbskullLast edited by Fishman'81; 02-20-2022, 10:43 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fishman'81 View Post
Yup.
But why does Utica have to play again on Tuesday? UC won the whole thing over a 25 game schedule, and Leb Valley is still in a position to take it away via a single game?
This entire AQ thing is completely idiotic.
It all starts with the goaltending.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fishman'81 View PostWilkes is a very dangerous team. Better than Adrian, from what I've seen first-hand, and ditto via Genny.
Of course, five games in the aggregate is a limited sample-size, but watch out for Wilkes if they garner a berth. I am absolutely convinced that they could beat anyone on a given night.Russell Jaslow
[Former] SUNYAC Correspondent
U.S. College Hockey Online
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fishman'81 View Post
Yup.
But why does Utica have to play again on Tuesday? UC won the whole thing over a 25 game schedule, and Leb Valley is still in a position to take it away via a single game?
This entire AQ thing is completely idiotic.
If you’re good enough, you will keep winning. If you don’t keep winning, maybe you just aren’t good enough after all.
In summary, win.
Dave
RIT - '90
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Russell Jaslow View Post
I know coaches who are definitely not taking Wilkes lightly. They know they are a very good team.
Wilkes certainly is within the top-12 in the country, and should easily be in the field, if there was any justice in the equation.
(But maybe an AQ will displace them. This is what D-3 does.)Last edited by Fishman'81; 02-21-2022, 11:36 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fishman'81
Same dumb-*** argument yet again.
Last I checked, there was a 25 game RS for every team.
So, your point (evidently) is that the RS is meaningless?
If that's the case, forget about the RS and go directly to the tournament.
Incredibly dumb, but if that's what hoops does, it's somehow makes it legit to some folks.
Stupid following stupid is still stupid.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Transplanted Tiger Fan View PostThink of it this way… the NCAA tournament starts now, but some may get a second chance at it. Win, and you keep playing. Lose, and you are in the hands of the at-large bids for that second chance.
If you’re good enough, you will keep winning. If you don’t keep winning, maybe you just aren’t good enough after all.
In summary, win.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fishman'81 View Post
OK, you pathetic little troll, explain to me why conference tournaments make any sense.
You can't, because they don't.
Comment
Comment