Re: ECAC Pick The Standings 2010-11
Another day another bump back to page 1.
Another day another bump back to page 1.
Team Avg High Low Std Dev
1 Yale 1.35 1 4 0.70
2 Corn 3.12 1 7 1.42
3 Colg 3.72 1 10 2.02
4 Union 4.33 1 10 2.00
5 RPI 5.38 1 12 2.19
6 Dart 6.20 1 12 2.66
7 Quinn 6.96 2 11 2.02
8 SLU 8.13 3 12 2.29
9 Prin 9.33 4 12 1.74
10 Brown 9.58 1 12 2.07
11 Harv 9.59 5 12 1.97
12 Clark 10.30 5 12 1.97
And the Distribution of the data
Yale Corn Colg Union RPI Dart Quin SLU Prin Brn Harv Clksn
1 52 5 6 2 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
2 12 24 16 9 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0
3 3 18 16 16 7 5 3 1 0 0 0 0
4 2 8 11 16 12 10 4 5 1 0 0 0
5 0 9 8 11 15 9 7 2 1 2 2 3
6 0 4 4 4 7 19 12 10 1 3 4 1
7 0 1 4 4 10 5 15 10 5 3 8 4
8 0 0 2 4 7 4 14 9 14 7 3 5
9 0 0 1 2 3 1 5 11 15 12 14 5
10 0 0 1 1 1 2 4 9 15 16 9 11
11 0 0 0 0 0 9 4 7 7 13 16 13
12 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 5 10 12 13 27
69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69
Team Avg High Low Std Dev
1 Yale 1.39 1 4 0.76
2 Corn 3.10 1 7 1.41
3 Colg 3.79 1 10 2.05
4 Union 4.22 1 10 2.04
5 RPI 5.39 1 12 2.15
6 Dart 6.29 1 12 2.66
7 Quinn 6.89 2 11 2.08
8 SLU 8.10 3 12 2.28
9 Prin 9.29 4 12 1.72
10 Harv 9.53 5 12 1.98
11 Brown 9.64 1 12 2.04
12 Clark 10.38 5 12 1.95
And the distribution of the voters:
Yale Corn Colg Union RPI Dart Quin SLU Prin Harv Brn Clksn
1 53 5 6 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
2 13 26 16 9 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0
3 3 18 17 17 7 5 4 1 0 0 0 0
4 3 9 11 16 12 10 5 5 1 0 0 0
5 0 9 9 11 17 9 7 2 1 2 2 3
6 0 4 4 4 7 20 12 12 1 4 3 1
7 0 1 4 4 11 5 15 10 5 10 3 4
8 0 0 3 4 7 4 14 9 16 3 7 5
9 0 0 1 2 3 2 6 11 16 14 12 5
10 0 0 1 1 1 3 4 10 15 10 16 11
11 0 0 0 0 0 9 4 7 7 16 16 13
12 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 5 10 13 12 30
72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72
Comment