Tweet
The ECAC had a mixed year. At the top, Cornell and Qpac represented the league well and came within a "hair's breadth" of making the Final Four. The pairwise told the rest of the story. If we use 30 as the break-even point, only three ECAC teams finished in the top half of the NCAA DI, and nine finished in the bottom half.
Teams finishing 1-20
Qpac 9
Cornell 12
Teams finishing 20-30
Dartmouth 29
Teams finishing 30-40
Colgate 36
Clarkson 37
Union 38
Teams Finishing 40-50
St Lawrence 43
Teams Finishing 50-65
Harvard 50
Yale 51
RPI 54
Princeton 55
Brown 61
Our interconference record as a league was also disappointing.
Will the transfer portal make the stronger leagues even stronger at the expense of the weaker leagues? Time will tell.
Teams finishing 1-20
Qpac 9
Cornell 12
Teams finishing 20-30
Dartmouth 29
Teams finishing 30-40
Colgate 36
Clarkson 37
Union 38
Teams Finishing 40-50
St Lawrence 43
Teams Finishing 50-65
Harvard 50
Yale 51
RPI 54
Princeton 55
Brown 61
Our interconference record as a league was also disappointing.
| Atlantic Hockey | (.344) | ||||||
| Big Ten | (.731) | ||||||
| CCHA | (.317) | ||||||
| ECAC | (.414) | ||||||
| Hockey East | (.672) | ||||||
| NCHC | (.685) |
Will the transfer portal make the stronger leagues even stronger at the expense of the weaker leagues? Time will tell.
Comment